Title: Volume FOIA 091

Release Date: 2014-03-20

Text: 29346

Volume 91 of 111
SJAR ROT
FOIA Version

VERBAT IM 1

RECORD OF TRIAL2

(and accompanying papers)

of
(Name: Last, First, Middie initiai) (Sociai Security Number) (Rank)
Headquarters and
Headquarters Company,
United States Army Garrison U-S- Army FCDIJC Ml/er: VA 22211
(Unit/Command Name) (Branch of Service) (Station or Snip)
By
GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL
Convened by Commander

(Titie of Con vening Authority)

UNITED STATES ARMY MILITARY DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
(Unit/Command of Con vening Authority)

Tried at

Fort. Meade, MD on see below

(Piace or Piaces of Triai) (Date or Dates of Triai-9

Date or Dates of Trial:

23 February 2012, 15-16 March 2012, 24-26 April 2012, 6-8 June 2012, 25 June 2012,

16-19 July 2012, 28-30 August 2012, 2 October 2012, 12 October 2012, 17-18 October 2012,
7-8 November 2012, 27 November - 2 December 2012, 5-7 December 2012, 10-11 December 2012,
8-9 January 2013, 16 January 2013, 26 February - 1 March 2013, 8 March 2013,

10 April 2013, 7-8 May 2013, 21 May 2013, 3-5 June 2013, 10-12 June 2013, 17-18 June 2013,
25-28 June 2013, 1-2 July 2013, 8-10 July 2013, 15 July 2013, 18-19 July 2013,

25-26 July 2013, 28 July - 2 August 2013, 5-9 August 2013, 12-14 August 2013,

16 August 2013, and 19-21 August 2013.

1 insert ?verbatirri or ?surrimari'zeo? as appropriate. This form be used by the Army and Navy for verbatim records of triai

2 See inside back co ver for instructions as to preparation and arrangement.

DD FORM 490, MAY 2000 PREWOUS OBSOLETE Front Cover

02914833 29347

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Please note the following updates to the execution of OPLAN Bravo.

1. Movement (PMO).

a. MILAIR. Request pending. Date selected, Time set.
b. Ground. MDN escort has been identified and trained. Coordination with

city/county/state/Federal law enforcement complete.

2. Confinement (PMO). Final coordination with local confinement facility
complete. Established procedure for reception, daily transfer, living
conditions (including Special Administrative Measures health and

welfare, protestors, and media plan.

3. Security (FGGM DES).

a. Threat Assessment. No Change.

b. Physical Security. No Change.

c. Information Security. issued network contingency plan to increase
situational awareness for FMMG and networks and provide network defense

and remediation.

4. Infrastructure (FGGM No Change.

5. Travel (SJA). TDY billeting plan established. SJA has line of accounting

available to create TDY authorizations in DTS.

6. Funding NSTR.



FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29348

7. Legal Proceedings (SJA). IO has reported and linked up with legal advisor.

8. Media Plan (MDH PAO).
a. Media Support. Media roundtable will be scheduled 7 or 8 DEC at OCPA to

establish ground rules for media and for attendance by general public,

including time, place, manner restrictions on demonstrations. Defense Team
published its request For witnesses, which has generated media inquiries. PAG
anticipated the inquiries, and PAO has responded to those inquiries.

b. Media Engagement. Legal spokesman media training conducted at OCPA.

9. Rehearsals. ROC drill 8 6906 DEC 11 at FGGM. T: Establish battle and
reporting. P: To Facilitate command and control of OPLAN Bravo during
operational phase.

16. Actions at higher. NSTR.

Please contact me or the OPR For detailed information.

Thank you.

V/r



3

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02914833 29349

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02915890 29350

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

8-em: Tuesda December 06. 2011 11:32 AM

To:

cc: onow an, SA JFHQ-NCRIMDW Ford, Arthur D. W01 USA JFHQ-


Subject: FW: US v. PFC BM (Discovery)
A?achnuuns:

Sir. FYSA. Discovery continues as we prepare for the Article 32.

--?--Original

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 11:32 AM

To:

Cc: Matthew kenkes; 'Tooman,Joshua CPT MIL US USA

Morrow Jooean, CPT USA

Overgaard, Angel H. CPT USA Ford, Arthur D. H01 USA
?Melissa Santiago?

Subject: US v. PFC BM (Discovery)

David,

On 5 Dec 11, we sent you (tracking 7610 1060 0001 1274 4057) unclassified
discovery (BATES: 00408202-60489672). These documents contain additional
pretrial confinement documents and other information).

Today, we sent you (tracking 7010 1966 0681 1274 4064) unclassified
discovery (BATES: These documents contain ISOs
disc images) of IA and other related training. Attached to this email is the
Microsoft windows 7 "help" instructions on how to burn an ISO to a blank


Today, Both items were delivered to CH2 Santiago (MAJ Kenkes is out of office
until 12 Dec).

Additionally, the government purchased the software your experts requested and
we are waiting for delivery.

v/r
Ashden

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02948313

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2935?
From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 6:30 PM
To: a
Cc: orrow JoDean, CPT USA Ford. Arthur D. WO1 USA JFHQ-

NCRIMDW SJA

Subject: FW: 6 DEC 11- SITREP Bravo (UNCLASSIFIED)

Sir. FYSA.

Message?--?-
From: Parra Jairo A. N01 USA JF -NCR MDN SJA



Subject: FW: 6 DEC 11- SITREP OPLAN Bravo (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOU0

FYSA


JP

Jairo A. Parra

N01, JA

Legal Administrator
JF -NCR MDN



The information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments may
contain Freedom of Information Act protected information, including attorney-client or
attorney work product privileged information. This information may not be released outside
of the Department of Defense without prior authorization from the Office of The Judge
Advocate General, Department of the Army. If you are not the intended recipient of this
information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance
on this information is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify this
office immediately by return email (see 5 U.S.C. 552 and Army Regulations 25-55 and 27-



From:
Sent: Tuesday, December 66, 2011 5:

02943313 29352

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



Subject: 6 DEC 11- SITREP OPLAN Bravo (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO

Ladies and Gentlemen:
Please note the following updates to the execution of OPLAN Bravo.

1. Movement (PMO). Request for temporary release of pretrial confinee
submitted to CDR, JRCF.
a. MILAIR. No Change. Request for aircraft pending. wargaming backup plans in
case of flight cancellation on requested date.
b. Ground. No Change. Coordination complete

2. Confinement (PMO). No Change. Coordination complete.

3. Security (FGGM DES).

a. Threat Assessment. No Change. DES developing COAs based on trigger points
for handling of demonstrators both at the perimeter and around the
courtroom/theater. Scheduled to brief CDR, FGGM, Thursday afternoon.

b. Physical Security. Courtroom interior security plan completed and will be
briefed to CDR, FGGM, Thursday. Traffic and parking plans approved.

c. Information Security. No Change. Increased SA and prepared to defend/react
to CNA.

4. Infrastructure (FGGM No Change. Construction underway. All six
trailers emplaced. Latrines delivered. Perimeter barriers are onsite for
assembly this weekend.

5. Travel (SJA). No Change. Billeting location selected and reserved for MDN
personnel.

6. Funding No Change.
7. Legal Proceedings (SJA). No Change. Discovery is ongoing.

8. Media Plan (MON PAO).

a. Media Support. Media Plan brief to CDR, FGGM, on 8 DEC 11. Media
roundtable scheduled for 9 6980 DEC at OCPA Media Conference Room to provide
media with ground rules and credentialing procedures.

b. Media Engagement. No Change. PAG complete and responding to inquiries.

9. Rehearsals. ROC drill 8 6960 DEC 11 at FGGM. 0n?site rehearsals 13 1300 DEC
11.

2

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

18. Actions at higher. NSTR.
Please contact me or the OPR for detailed information.
Thank you.

v/r

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Manning, Bradley E.

PFC, U.S. Army,

HHC, U.S. Army Garrison,
Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall
Fort Myer, Virginia 22211



v. Prosecution Response to
Defense Motion to Dismiss
for Lack of Speedy Trial
1 Enclosure 79 (Article 32 Emails)
23 October 2012
Email Number DATE TIME
4-Aug-10 14:48:00
4-Aug-10 18:11:38
6-Aug-10 17:30:06
9-Aug-10 22:36:00
10-Aug-10 13:09:18
11-Aug-10 09:33:00
11-Aug-10 13:08:15
12-Aug-10 20:12:00
10-Sep-10 10:21:09
10-Sep-10 10:25:00
10-Sep-10 10:31:52
14-Oct-10 17:59:33
14-Oct-10 22:00:00
15-Oct-10 08:54:01
20-Dec-10 10:47:35
20-Dec-10 18:53:00
20-Dec-10 19:53:27
25-Jan-11 19:16:00
25-Jan-11 23:04:55
25-Jan-11 23:37:00
15-Feb-11 14:09:43
15-Feb-11 23:00:00
16-Feb-11 08:07:19
17-Feb-11 17:05:15
17-Feb-11 17:15:35
18-Feb-11 11:43:58
25-Feb-11 15:01:00
25-Feb-11 21:41:59
26-Feb-11 16:46:00
26-Feb-11 18:52:13
28-Fe b-11 10:09:02
28-Feb-11 18:05:20
28-Feb-11 21:50:00
14-Mar-11 10:04:39
14-Mar-11 10:58:00

29354



Unc|assified__Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0036 20-Mar-11 00:42:00
21-Mar-11 12:50:38
2_0038 21-Mar-11 12:53:00
Unclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0039 29-Apr-11 18:13:00
2-May-11 09:06:34
26-May-11 18:26:00
27-May-11 08:55:52
30-May-11 11:37:00
31-May-11 09:11:00
Unc|assified_Emai|_Article_3 2_0045 31-May-11 09:19:02
21-Jun-11 10:35:12
2_0047 23-Jun-11 08:12:17
28-Jun-11 16:59:14
Unclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0049 26-Jul-11 21:40:00
2__0050 27-Jul-11 08:36:25
nc|assified__Emai|_Article_3 2_oo51 29-Aug-11 19:23:00
nclassified__Email_Artic|e_3 2_0052 30-Aug-11 12:58:59
28-Sep-11 17:08:00
29-Sep-11 11:15:41
10-Nov-11 15:51:00
10-Nov-11 15:59:53
2_0057 10-Nov-11 19:25:24
2_0058 10-Nov-11 22:21:30
nc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0059 11-Nov-11 06:54:46
2_0060 11-Nov-11 08:14:35
nclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0061 11-Nov-11 09:43:03
Unc|assified__Email__Article_3 2_0062 13-Nov-11 20:18:43
2_0063 16-Nov-11 17:25:00
16-Nov-11 18:35:25
16-Nov-11 18:35:34
UncIassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0066 16-Nov-11 18:38:00
Unclassified_EmaiI_Artic|e_3 2_0067 18-Nov-11 14:18:50
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0068 21-Nov-11 07:40:00
2_0069 21-Nov-11 10:05:36
2__0070 21-Nov-11 10:20:00
UncIassified_Emai|_Article_3 22-Nov-11 17:46:36
2_0072 22-Nov-11 17:57:00
UncIassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0073 22-Nov-11 17:58:54
23-Nov-11 15:28:11
23-Nov-11 15:30:30
23-Nov-11 15:36:07
23-Nov-11 15:37:25
23-Nov-11 16:16:52
25-Nov-11 13:15:00

2

29355

28-Nov-11 10:57:20
nclassified_Email_Artic|e_3 2__0081 28-Nov-11 12:55:00
nc|assified__Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0082 28-Nov-11 14:13:53
nc|assified_EmaiI_Artic|e_3 2__0083 29-Nov-11 13:36:10
29-Nov-11 14:23:14
30-Nov-11 11:52:28
30-Nov-11 15:39:40
30-Nov-11 22:08:00
1-Dec-11 10:15:15
1-Dec-11 16:30:24
1?Dec-11 17:04:11
nclassified_Ema i|_Article_32_0091 1-Dec-11 19:02:00
2-Dec-11 09:18:10
Unc|assified__Email_Artic|e_3 2_0093 2-Dec-11 09:21:00
2-Dec-11 18:49:00
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0095 2-Dec-11 23:00:56
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0096 4-Dec-11 11:39:08
nc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0097 4-Dec-11 12:38:00
nc|assified_Email_Artic|e_3 2_0098 4-Dec-11 16:44:53
nc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0099 4-Dec-11 19:25:15
nc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0100 5-Dec-11 08:22 :00
ncIassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0101 5-Dec-11 11:28:00
nctassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0102 5-Dec-11 13:53:00
Unclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0103 5-Dec-11 20:42:00
Unclassified_Emai|_Artic|e__3 2_0104 6-Dec-11 10:34:43
Unc|assified_Email_Artic|e_3 2_0105 6-Dec-11 10:49:00
6-Dec-11 11:00:22
6-Dec-11 14:57:40
6-Dec-11 14:57:47
Unc|assified__Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0109 6-Dec-11 15:40:00
6-Dec-11 17:47:43
6-Dec-11 17:53:00
6-Dec-11 17:55:00
nclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0113 6-Dec-11 18:25:24
nclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0114 7-Dec-11 08:30:29
nclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0115 7-Dec-11 08:33:00
Unclassified_Emai|_ArticIe_3 2_0116 7-Dec-11 17:50:47
UncIassified_Email__Articie_3 2_0117 7-Dec-11 18:29:00
7-Dec-11 19:16:00
7-Dec-11 19:16:01
7-Dec-11 19:16:04
7-Dec-11 19:22:00
7-Dec-11 19:25:53
7-Dec-11 20:12:41

3

29356



7-Dec-11 20:28:00
7-Dec-11 20:34:56
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e__3 2_0126 7-Dec-11 20:56:00
8-Dec-11 10:01:03
Unclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0128 8-Dec-11 11:21:41
8-Dec-11 11:56:00
8-Dec-11 12:56:07
2_0131 8-Dec-11 16:00:00
8-Dec-11 16:20:10
9-Dec-11 09:26:10
9-Dec-11 09:34:03
135 9-Dec-11 09:43:00
9-Dec-11 13:48:00
Unc|assified_Emai|_ArticIe_3 2_0137 9-Dec-11 13:51:47
9-Dec-11 17:19:26
2__0139 11-Dec-11 18:13:37
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0140 11-Dec-11 18:14:00
2_0 141 11-Dec-11 22:34:33
11-Dec-11 23:17:24
Unclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0143 12-Dec-11 14:46:37
12-Dec-11 14:50:00
2_0145 12-Dec-11 14:55:44
UncIassified_Emai|__Artic|e__3 2_0146 12-Dec-11 17:44:27
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0147 12-Dec-11 20:59:47
12-Dec-11 21:01:00
12-Dec-11 21:15:05
12-Dec-11 21:20:00
12-Dec-11 21:42:09
12-Dec-11 22:50:00
13-Dec-11 08:37:35
13-Dec-11 08:55:54
mai|_Artic|e_32_0155 13-Dec-11 12: 18:28
13-Dec-11 16:21:26
13-Dec-11 18:45:33
13-Dec-11 19:06:38
14-Dec-11 06:21:46
Unc|assified_Emai|_Article__3 2__0160 14-Dec-11 09:07:50
2_0161 14-Dec-11 10:00:38
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0162 14-Dec-11 10:36:00
14-Dec-11 12:34:35
Unc|assified_Emai|__Artic|e_3 2_0164 14-Dec-11 13:03:28
2_0165 14-Dec-11 13:27:17
Unc|assified_Emai|__Article_3 2_0166 14-Dec-11 13:39:09
Unclassified_Emai|_Article_3 2_0167 14-Dec-11 14:34:51

4

29357

14-Dec-11 14:36:00
14-Dec-11 16:11:43
14-Dec-11 16:16:48
14-Dec-11 21:40:00
14-Dec-11 22:26:34
14-Dec-11 22:47:20
14-Dec-11 23:04:00
14-Dec-11 23:15:22
15-Dec-11 11:13:03
15-Dec-11 12:41:07
15-Dec-11 15:24:24
UncIassified__Email_Artic|e_3 2_0179 15-Dec-11 16:12:19
Unc|assified_Email_Article_3 2_0180 15-Dec-11 17:47:49
Unc|assified_Emai|_Article_3 2_0181 15-Dec-11 17:54:51
nclassified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 15-Dec-11 18:22:47
15-Dec-11 18:54:50
15-Dec-11 20:53:03
15-Dec-11 22:28:05
15-Dec-11 22:30:37
Unc|assified_Email_Article_3 2_0187 16-Dec-11 18:11:58
Unc|assified_Emai|_Artic|e_3 2_0188 16-Dec-11 18:16:22
2_0189 17-Dec-11 23:05:20
17-Dec-11 23:55:59
Unclassified_Email_ArticIe_3 2_0191 23-Dec-11 17:44:01
27-Dec-11 16:39:47
27-Dec-11 16:42:22
Unciassified_Emai|_ArticIe_3 2_0194 3-Jan-12 12:34:00
4-Jan?12 19:01:40
4-Jan?12 19:03:36

29358

?288?9? FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29359

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 2:48 PM

To: 'Ahnanza,PauP

Cc: ?Morrow, JoDean CPT MIL 'Haber1and, John CPT MIL Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT

USA JFHQ- 'Hur1ey. Thomas MAJ MIL USA
aton, I ael CPT USF-I SJ A Trial
Defense Attorney; Autry, Carolyn Ms CIV Egan. Michael CIV
SJA





Subject: Articie 32 Appointment (PFC Manning)
Attachments: Art 32 Appointment Memo (ManningB).pdf; Charge Sheet (ManningB).pdf; ERB
(ManningB).pdf
Importance: High

LTC Almanza,

Good afternoon. The Garrison Commander, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall
appointed you the Article 32 Investigating Officer in the case of
PFC Manning. Attached are your appointment orders, the current charge
sheet, and an ERB. Below is a list of the key members of the Government and
?Defense teams, along with your support staff and everyone is on this email.
This list is still fluid and will likely change, to include security
officers. Because of the sensitive nature of this case, I request that we
limit the email list to these persons, until more formal "teams" are
established.

Government Counsel

CPT Ashden Fein (OIC)
CPT Joe Morrow (TC)

CPT John Haberland (TC)
CPT Luke Rose (TC-Iraq)

Defense

CPT Paul Bouchard
CPT Michael Eaton (DC-Iraq)
MAJ Thomas Hurley (DC?Loca1)

Justice Staff
SGT Sara Zimmerman (270-MDN)
Mrs. Carolyn Autry (Senior Para1ega1?MDw)

Legal Advisor
Mr. Mike Egan

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDN)

1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02881938

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29360



F0 OF I IAL LY

0221 9544

29361

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY










rm-= Almam. Paul
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 6:11 PM
To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA
Cc: Morrow, JoDean CPT MIL USA Haberland, John CPT
Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT USA IFHQ-
Hurley, omas
Eaton.

Mic ae PTU F-I De ense Attorney

Autry, Carolyn Ms CIV SJA


Subject: Article 32 Appointment (PFC Manning)
CPT Fein -

Ihank you. Just to make you all awarc- CPT Fcin and I woke
yesterday about my availability to be appointed as the 10 and
Contact information.

I'll touch base with Mr. Egan tomormw and expect to be in touch
tomorrow more substantively.

Thanks.

LTC Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?22?95?3 FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29362

Fr?m= Almam Paul

Sent: Friday, August 6, 2010 5:30 PM

To: ein, Ashden CPT USA SJ A
Morrow, JoDean CPT MIL USA
Eaton, Mic ae CPT A Tn'al Defense

Haberland John CPT MTL USA
Hurley, Thomas MAJ











MIL

Cc: Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT SA JFHQ- SJ A
Aut Carol Ms CIV JFHQ-
Egan, Michael CIV JFHQ-

Subject: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
Counsel-

I anticipate getting the notification memo out early next week. and
tentatively plan to set a healing for the morning of August 13, within
the ten day period speci?ed by my appointment orders.

Should you be considering requesting a delay. please consider this email
a head's up.

LTC Almama

F0 IAL LY

?288'96? FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29363

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 10:37 PM

To: Almanza. Paul; Monow. JoDean CPT MIL aton.
Michael CPT SJ A Trial Defense Attorney;

Hudey, Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

Cc: mmerman, ra . SA Autry. Camlyn Ms CIV JFHQ-
NCRIMDW SJA: Egan, Michael CIV JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA
Subject: RE: Anicie 32 (PFC Manning)
Sir,

The United States and Defense spoke today and we anticipate a delay request
to be submitted to the in the next few days, which will effectively
push the Art 32 to the right.

v/r?
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (FDH)



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219541

From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:

Subject:

CPT Fein -

29364

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Almam Pan?

Tuesday, August 10. 2010 1:09 PM

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Monow. JoDean CPT MIL USA
Eaton, Michael CPT USF-I A Tnal Defense

Haberland. John CPT MIL USA
Hurley, Thomas MAJ








MIL USA OTJAG
Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- SJA

Autry. Carolyn Ms IV IFHQ-
A Egan, Mnchael CIV IFHQ-
SJA

RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)






Thanks for the update Please keep me posted.

Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02881960

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:
Attachrnoms:

Sir,

29365

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Fem. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Wednesday. August 11. 2010 9:34 AM

Almanza. Paul; Morrow. JoDean CPT MIL Eaton,
Michael CPT USF-I SJ A Trial Defense Attorney;

Huney, Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG
mennan. ra . SA JFHQ- Autry. Carolyn Ms CIV JFHQ-
Egan, Michae! CIV JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA
RE: Anlcle 32 (PFC Manning)
Art 32 Defense Delay - 11 Aug 10 (ManningB).pdf

The Defense submitted a formal Delay request. Do you have any objections or
comments before submitted to the

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice





U.S. Army Military District of washington (mu)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219538

29366

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY








no-n= Armanza. Paul
Sent: Wednesday. August 11, 2010 l;08 PM
To: Fein, Ashden USA sm
Ce: Zimmerman. Sara J. SGT USA JFHO- SJA
Autrv. Carolyn Ms CIV JFHO-
SJA Egan. Michael CIV JFHO-
Morrow Dean CPT MIL

USA

Michael CPT USF-I A Trial Defense Attomev

Haberland- John CPT MIL USA

Hurlev. Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
CPT Fein

No objccilons. As [It defense request is Ihru me. I'll submil an
endorsement recommending approval of the defenses delay rcqucsl.

Thanks.
LTC Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





02881955 29367

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Thulsday, August 12. 2010 8:13 PM

To: Almanza. Paul; Morrow, JoDean CPT MIL USA Eaton,
Michael CPT USF-I SJ A Trial Defense Attomey; a

il; Hurley. Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

Cc: mmennan. ra . USA JFHQ- Autry. Carolyn Ms CIV JFHQ-
SJA: Egan, Michael CIV JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

Attachments: An 32 Delay - 12 Aug 10 (MannInoB).pdf

hnponance: limb

Sir,

The Convening Authority approved the defense delay of the Article 32
Investigation. Please see attached memorandum.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDH)



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29368

??'9536 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Fro-n= Almanzaavaun




Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:21 AM
To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA
Hurley, Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

Cc: Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- SJA


Subject: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
Gentlemen

Hope this finds you well. Just touching base in case you have an ETA on
when the sanity board may be completed.

Thanks.

LTC Almanza

. . . FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY


FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29369

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Friday. September 10. 2010 10:25 AM

To: Almanza. Paul; Kemkes. Matthew MAJ MIL
Morrow Ill. JoDean. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Cc: Zimmerman. Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- Huney, Thomas MAJ MIL USA


subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

Sir,

Good morning. I added Mr. David Coombs and MAJ Matt Kemkes to this email. Mr. Coonbs is PFC
Manning's CDC and Kemkes is the lead TDS counsel. MAJ Hurley is no longer detailed to
the case.

The Art 32 and RCM 796 inquiry are still on hold based on multiple defense requests. we do
not have an anticipated time on when the Art 32 will occur. The RCM 796 board was originally
given six weeks to complete their board, but that is on hold.

Could you please pass your SSN to SGT Zimmerman so that the United States may proactively
work any security issues that might arise.

Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDN)



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29370

?22??53" FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY

-won-= Mmamvaun

Sent: Friday. September 10, 2010 10:32 AM

To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Matthew kemkes
Morrow .|oDean, CPT USA






SJA
Zimmerman. Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- SJA



Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)



Cc:

Thank you. CPT Fem Will do.

LTC Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1

02219532 29371

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
no-n= Anmam. Pawn?

Sent: Thursday, October 14. 2010 5:59 PM

To: FeinMorrow HI, JoDean, CPT USA IF





SJA
Cc: Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- SJA
Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
All -

Since it's been about a momh since we last touched base. I'm checking
in to see if you have an} ETA on the completion of the sanity board.

Additionally . as the current delay we're on will expire when the sanity
board is completed please give some thought as to whether you
an?cipatc seeking additional delay (depending of course on when the
sanity board is expected to be completed).

Thanks!

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

2

02881951

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29372
.-
From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Thursday. October 14. 2010 10:00 PM
To: Almanza, Paul; Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill,
JoDean, CPT USA Habenand. John CPT USA Regimental Judge
Advocate; Rose, Luke CPT SJA Chief, Military Justice
Cc: Zimmerman. Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- SJA
Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
Sir,

Currently we are still in pre-RCM 706 delay for security matters. At this point, we do not
have an estimate on their completion, but once they are then we should move directly in the
RCM 766 board, pending a determination of security clearances. Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice



U.S. Army Military District of Washington (IVDW)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

3

02219529

29373

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY







Anmanza. van?
Sent: Friday. October 15, 2010 8:54 AM
To: Fein, CPT USA SJA
Matthew em es
Morrow ll], JoDean, CPT USA
Habcdand, John CPT USA Regimental
Judge Advocate Rose, Luke CPT USD-C SJA
Chief. Military Justice l>
Cc: Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- SJA
Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
CPT Fcin -
Thanks for the info.
LTC Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

4

02219526 29374

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Armanza.vauum>

Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 l0:47 AM

To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Matthew kemkes

Morrow JoDean, CPT USA

Haberland, John CPT USA Regimental







Judge Advocate Rose, Luke PT USD-C S1 A
Chief. Military Justice
Cc: Zimmerman, Sara]. SGT USA JFHQ- NCRIMDW SJA.
Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
All -

Just touching basc again on th: status of this matter. Let me know if
you have an ETA on the completion of the sanity board.

Thanks. and holidays to all of you.
LTC Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

5

02909150 29375

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Monday. December 20. 2010 6:53 PM
To: Almanza. Paul; Matthew kemkes; Momow Ill.

JoDean, CPT USA JFI-IQ-NCRIMDW Habedand. John CPT USA Regiments! Judge
Advocate; Rose, Luke CPT USD-C SJA Chief, Military Justice

Cc: Zimmerman. Sara J. SGT USA JFHQ- SJA
Subject: RE: Anicie 32 (PFC Manning)
Sir,

Good evening. The Sanity Board will likely begin after the New Year. we are currently
moving into the process of ensuring all participants have appropriate clearances. Have a
Happy Holidays!

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Nashington (MDN)
I



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219522

29376

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





From: Almanza, Paul
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 7:53 PM
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA A

Matthew em es

Morrow HI, JoDean. CPT USA
Haberland, John CPT USA Regimental

Judge voca
Cc: Zimmerman, Sara J. SGT USA SJA
Subject: Re: Anicle (PFC Manning)
Thank you. CPT Fein.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

7

02909155 29377

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:16 PM
To: 'Ahnanza,Paur

Cc: Canile, Monica L. SFC USA
'coombs@armyoourtm

a orrow JoDean, CPT USA
SJA
Subject: Article 32 (PFC Mannin

LTC Almanza,




Good evening. The purpose of this email is to give you an update on the Article 32 for PFC
Manning. Although the RCM 706 board is still delayed, we expect the clearance issue to be
resolved shortly. with the assistance of the Army G2, we are coordinating to have all
foreseeable participants in the overall court-martial process receive clearances and
subsequent read?on's for the required compartments. Your clearance is currently valid and
you just need to be read-on.

Read-on's will likely occur in City. I plan to give some lead time for this and we
will likely plan early morning or late in the day to accommodate around work schedules.
Assuming no critical issues in the remaining participants I anticipate the read-
ons to occur next week and the RCM 706 to start again the following week.

If you have any questions, please send them to the entire email distribution. Also, my
office added SFC Monica Carlile to the team and she is currently the dedicated paralegal to
all issues for this case, including providing you the needed support as the 10. SFC Carlile
is CCed on this email.

Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of washington (MDN)



1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29378







Sent: Tuesday. January 25. 2011 ll:0-1 PM
To: Fein. Ashden PT USA SJA
Cc: Carlile. Monica SFC USA SJA

Matthew kemkes
Morrow Ill, JoDean. USA SJA

Subject: I Re: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

Fem -
Thank you for keeping me posted.

For the I will be on travel for the [nlerscmoc h?lnlun Judges Seuumr next week. I may be available. er. enther early Monday.
or 1:11: Friday next week. be an ullublc the l?ollm\ ing neck.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFHCIAL USE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29379


From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Tuesday. January 25, 2011 11:38 PM
To: Ahnanza,Paul
Cc: Cadile, Monica L. SFC USA SJA:

Matthew kemkes; Morrow IN, JoDean, CPT USA
I
Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manmng

thank you sir. MIF.

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDH)



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29380

M9519 FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY
From: Almanza, Paul
Sent? Tuesday. February 15. 2011 2:09 PM

To: Fein. Ashden cm USA sm











Cc: Carlile, Monica L. SFC USA SJA

Ma cw kemkes Morrow Ill, JoDean. CPT USA

il; Egan. Michael SJA

Subject: Article 32 (PFC Manningwas lead on 1 know that we're still on delay pending the completion of the sanity board. I do. however. have two

qucuions. which have a bit more urgent} now based on the fact that I understand I'm going to get activated on 1 April for six months:

1. When do you amicipatc the sanity board being completed?

and
2. Govcnuncnt. how long do you cslimalc the heating will take. in terms of the presentation of evidence?.?

Thank you.
LTC Alnum/:1

OFFICIAL ONLY

029091 59

29381

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY


Sent
To:

Sub?nn:

Sir,

Good evening.

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Tuesday. February 15. 2011 11:01 PM

Ahnanza.Paul

Cadile, Monica L. SFC USA
Matthew kemkes; Morrow JoDean. CPT USA

ael CIV SJA:
Habenand. John CPT MIL USA
RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

Currently the sanity board has a suspense of 3 March 2911. Assuming the board

adequately completes their findings by the suspense, then the United States expects the
Article 32 to be ready to start by 15 March 2011, absent any additional delays. Once the
hearing starts, the United States estimates a total oF three days to complete.

Is your 1 April activation keeping you in the local area or is this a deployment?

v/r

CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPI, JA

Chief, Military Justice
U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDH)



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29382










02219516
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
mu-= mmanzas Paul
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 201 1 807 AM
To: Fein, Ashden USA SJA
Cc: Carlile, Monica L. USA SJA

Matthew kemkes Morrow Ill. JoDean, CPT USA
JA Egan, Michael IV
SJA
Subject: Re: Anicle 32 (PFC Manning)

Thanks. CPT Fem. Assuming an: Incl. then: should be no problem.

The actmnion will be in the local area.

LTC Almanm

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02215529 29383

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



From:

Sent: Thursday, February 17,2011 5:05 PM

To: Almanza,Paul

Cc: Carlile, Monica L. SFC USA JFH SJA






Matthew kemkes
Morrow IH, JoDean, CPT USA
Egan, Michael CIV

Subject: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
Attach: Article 32 Compel Discovery .pdf
LTC Almanza,

Please see the attached motion to compel discovery for the Article 32.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

45 North Main Street, 5th Floor

Fall River, MA 02720

Of?ce: 1-800-588-4156

Fax: (508) 324-9896



Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attorney-
client information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this
information may be unlawful and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02215513
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29384
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:15 PM

Pan? Nmanza






Cc: Carlile, Monica L. SFC USA SJA
Matthew kemkes
Morrow JoDean, CPT USA
Egan, Michael CIV
SJA
Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Subject: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
Attach: Attachment A.pdf; Attachment B.pdf; Attachment C.pdf; Attachment D.pdf; Attachment

E. pdf; Attachment F.pdf
LTC Almanza,

Here are the attachments to the defense motion.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

45 North Main Street, 5th Floor

Fall River, MA 02720

Office: 1-800-588-4156

Fax: (508) 324-9896



Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attorney-
client information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this
information may be unlawful and is

F0 I CIAL LY

29385

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY
A?mma~ Paul
Sent: Friday. February 18, 201] 11:41 AM
To:
Cc: Carlilc. Monica L. SFC USA SJA



Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

Thank you, Mr. Coornbs.
Government, any response? If so, please submit by C08 on 25 Feb 11.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02909163

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29386

From:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Sir,

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Friday, Febmary 25, 2011 3:01 PM

Alrnanza. Paul;

Cariile, Monica L. SFC USA Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill, JoDean,
CPT USA Egan, Michael CIV

CPT

RE: Anicle 32 (PFC Manning)
11-Feb-25-Government Response to Defense Request to compel Discovery tor An 32
(ManningB).pdf

Please see attached response.

v/r?
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice



U.S. Anny Military District 04? Washington (HM)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02215497 29337

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 9:4] PM

Tm Pau1~manzam>

Cc: Carlile. Monica L. SFC USA SJA

Matthew kemkes

Morrow Ill, JoDean, CPT USA

an, Michael CIV








HaberIand,JoI1n CPT MIL USA
Fein, Ashden CPT USA IF SJA

Subject: [Suspected RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

LTC Almanza,

The defense does not believe its discovery request is either improper or premature. The government has
represented that it will be prepared to proceed with the Article 32 on 15 March 2011. Given this fact, the

defense has requested necessary discovery in order to adequately prepare for the hearing.

If the government's position is that it either lacks the necessary approval to provide discovery from the
required OCA or that it has been instructed to assert a privilege under then the lack of
discovery is understandable. However, if this is not the case, then the government should provide the
requested discovery. Every member of the defense team has the requisite security clearance. We are able
to appropriately store any classi?ed information. By providing timely discovery, we can avoid any necessity
for a delay in the Article 32 hearing.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

45 North Main Street, 5th Floor

Fall River, MA 02720

Office: 1-800-588-4156

Fax: (508) 689-9282



Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may mntain con?dential attorney-
client information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, mpying or use of this
information may be unlawful and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Saturday. February 26. 2011 4:47 PM

To: Paul Almanza

Cc: Carlile, Monica L. SFC USA Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill, JoDean,

CPT USA Egan. Michael CIV
Habenand,John CPT MIL
USA
Subject: RE: [Suspected RE: Anicte 32 (PFC Manning)

Sir,

we agree with the defense-if the prosecution receives authorization to release classified
documents to the defense, then that information will be immediately given to the defense.
The United States has not received any approvals to release classified information to the
defense, therefore it has not occurred. Although these requests have been working through
the USG, they are ot approved yet. we are aggressively pursuing each Original
Classification Authority (OCA) for their approval and whether we must assert the MRE 505
privilege over the information.

Below clarifies my previous email that the "United States expects the Article 32 to be ready
to start by 15 March 2011, absent any additional delays.? Currently many different
administrative and substantive processes are occurring, including the defense's requested RCM
796 board, OCA reviews, etc. Each of these play a factor in the ultimate re?start date for
the Article 32. Prior to the Article 32 proceeding, the RCM 796 board must be completed.
Prior to its completion, the defense counsel requested to meet with his client in a SCIF,
which was different than the SCIF previously designated by the convening authority. All of
these factors, along with the OCA reviews, contribute to the re-start date of the Article 32.

Notwithstanding all the administrative and substantive processes referenced above, the United
States recognizes its duty to produce witnesses and evidence for use at an Article 32
investigation in order to ensure the investigation is thorough and impartial under RCM 485.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDH)



OR 0 IAL ON LY

29389






FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
From: Almanza, Paul
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 6.52 PM
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Cc: Cariile, Monica L. SFC USA SJA
Manhew kemkes
orrow JODean. CPT USA
an, Michael CIV
Subject: Re: [Suspected RE: Anicle 32 (PFC Manning)

Thank you CPT Fein and Mr. Coombs. 1'1] be in touch on Monday

LTC Alxnama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?22'5"92 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29390

From:

Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 10:08 AM

To: Paul Almanza?>

Cc: Carlile, Monica L. SFC USA SJA

Matthew kemkes
Morrow JoDean, CPT USA
SM ma Egan. Michael cw
SJA

T, Haberland,John MIL us?.
Fein, Ashden USA SJA


Subject: [Suspected RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

LTC Almanza,

The defense understands that without OCA approval, the government is limited in what it can provide in
discovery. The defense, however, is unclear how this determination would impact other discovery
requested such as the following:

a) The T-SCIF accreditation packet for FOB Hammer;

b) CCIU, USACID Investigative File and any subsequent case file detailing CID's investigation (we
currently only have the ?le report from CID dated 23 June 2010);

c) A complete copy of any emails or memorand urns relating to the preferral of charges in this case;

d) The complete IM chat logs provided by Adrian Lamo;

e) Names and contact information for all government investigators who have participated or who are
presently participating in the investigation of this case;

f) LTG Cas|en's report submitted to the Secretary of Defense;

g) Recorded audio or video footage of PFC Manning in Kuwait and Quantico;

h) Other government investigations as referenced by the Secretary of Defense regarding joint
investigations by the military, the Department of Justice, the Department of State, the Central Intelligence
Agency, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

i) Any and all documentation related to President Barack Obama's order for a government wide-review of
how agencies safeguard sensitive information;

j) Any and all documents or observation notes by the Quantico con?nement facility relating to PFC
Manning;

k) The results of the 15-6 investigation into the govemment?s improper release of classified information
to the defense and whether the government looked into the referenced areas of additional possible
spillage;

I) Any inquiry and testimony taken by the House of Representative oversight committee led by
Representative Darrell Issa; AND

m) The names of soldiers who have been ?agged related to this case, the nature for why they were
?agged, who imposed the flag, and any other derogatory information in support of the ?ag.

Obtaining the above discovery in a timely manner will aid in to overall processing of this case. It will also
assist the defense in identifying relevant witnesses for the Article 32 hearing.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Of?ce of David E. Coombs
45 North Main Street, 5th Floor
Fall River, MA 02720

Office: 1-800-588-4156

Fax: (508) 689-9282

F0 OF I IAL LY

?22?5?92 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2939?


w. i

Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attorney-
cllent infomwation and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended

recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this
information may be unlawful and is prohibite

I

02219505
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29392
rm-=
Sent: Monday, February 28, 201 1 6:05 PM
To? Fein. Ashden CPT USA


Cc: Carlil . Monica L. SFC USA SJA

Matthew kemkes
orrow 111, JoDcan. CPT USA
Egan. Michael IV








A



Haberland,John CPT MIL USA

Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

Mr. Coombs, CPT Fein -

As CPT Fein has noted, I have not been provided with any evidence for consideration in this case. Other than procedural
documents such as my appointment memorandum and various emails since last August, the only documents I have so
far received are a charge sheet and PFC Manning's ER8. I received those documents on 4 August 2010.

Until such time as receive additional information from the Government, I will be unable to make a preliminary
determination of what witnesses will be produced at the hearing and what other evidence will be considered. Once I
make that determination and provide notice to the defense of the witnesses and evidence that I intend to consider via a
memorandum notifying the defense of the hearing, the defense will have the ability to request the production of other
witnesses or evidence at the hearing and we will go from there.

In one of my recent emails I informed you that I was anticipating being activated on or about 1 April. That date now
appears to be on or about 25 April, although I don't yet have written orders. Additionally, I will be unavailable the week

of 18 April.
Thank you.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFHCIAL USE ONLY

02909168

29393

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



Cc:

Subject:

Ack sir.

Thank you.

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Monday, February 28. 2011 9:51 PM
Almanza. Paul;

Cadile, Monica L. SFC USA Matthew kemkes; Morrow JoDean,

CPT USA Egan, Michael CIV
HabeI1and.John CPT MIL

RE: Anicie 32 (PFC Manning)

Chief, Military Justice



C014

U.S. Anny Military District of washington (mu)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?22'9??9 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29394

A1manza.vaui?m>

Sent: Monday, March 14, 20l I 10:04 AM -
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA
il>
Cc: Carlile. Monica L. SFC USA SJA

Matthew kemkes



Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)

All -

The last information I received on potential timing regarding this matter was that there was a 3 March suspense for the
sanity board being completed, and the government anticipated three days to present evidence and believed they would
be ready to begin on 15 March. It goes without saying that at least some of this information is no longer current.

Government, recognizing you may not be in a position to provide hard estimates, I would appreciate any updates on
timing that you can provide.


2
Thank you.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





02909177 29395

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Monday. March 14, 2011 10:58 AM
To: Almanza. Paul;
Cc: Cadite. Monica L. SFC USA Matthew kemkes; Morrow JoDean,
CPT USA SJA: Egan. Michael CIV
Habedand.John CPT MIL

Subject: RE: Article 32 (PFC Manning)
Sir,

Good morning. The United States arranged for a SCIF to be used by the defense and sanity
board. we are still in a holding pattern until the defense and the sanity board meet with
the accused in the SCIF. Currently the defense is scheduled for 26 March 2611 and the sanity
board owes us the first available time after the 26th. Once those meetings occur, then we
will have a better estimate of when the Article 32 will re-start.

-Break-

In future correspondences, please refer to PFC BM using the accused or an abbreviation, e.g.
PFC BM or SM. This request is for security purposes.

V/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?29?9?9? FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29396



From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Sunday. March 20, 2011 12:43 AM

To: Annanza,PauI

Cc: Cadile. Monica L. SFC USA Matthew kemkes; Morrow JoDean.

CPT USA Egan, Michael CIV
Habet1and,John CPT
coorn armycounmatiialdefensecorn
subject: Anicle 32 (PFC BM)
Attachments: Directive to Investigate Additional Changes (MannIngB).pdf: 10-Jul-05-

Original Chatge Sheet DISMISSED REDACTED (ManningB).pdf; 11-Mar-01-Additional
Charge Sheet REDACTED (ManningB).pdf

LTC Almanza,

Good evening. Additional charges were preferred against PFC BM on 1 March 2011 and the
directed you to investigate these charges. Although the alleged misconduct is substantially
similar between the two charge sheets, the convening authority dismissed the original charges
and directs you not to consider those charges.

Please see the attachments to this email. Thank you and have a good weekend.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

FOR OFHCIAL USE ONLY

02219492

29397

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY






Fr?m= Almam Pan?

Sent: Monday, March 21. 20!] 12:45 PM

To: Fein. Ashden PT USA

SJA
Cc: Carlile, Monica L. SFC USA SJA
Matthew kemkes
orrow JoDean. CPT USA
Egan, Michael IV
SJA
. Habcrland.John CPT MIL USA
Subject: RE: Anicle 32 (PFC Manning)
CPT Fein -

I received your email over the weekend. Any response to the below?

Thanks.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02909186

Fnmn:

To:
Cc:

Subject:

Sir,

I apologize.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29398

Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Monday, March 21. 2011 12:53 PM

Almanza. Paul;

Cariile. Monica L. SFC USA Matthew kemkes; Momow JoDean,
CPT USA Egan. Michael CIV

Havenand-John CPT MIL

RE: Anicle 32 (PFC Manning)

On 18 March 2011, the granted an extension to the RCM 706 board with a

suspense date of 16 April 2011. with that new date, I do not foresee the Article 32 kicking
off any earlier than 1 May 2011; although the Government should be ready to proceed once the
sanity board is complete. Also, at this point, the Government anticipates one week For
evidence presentation.

Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?9999?99 FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 99999

2
From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Friday, Am?! 29. 2011 6:14 PM
To: Ahnanza.Paul
Cc: Carlile, Monica L. SFC USA Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill, JoDean,
CPT USA Egan. Michael CIV JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA:
";Haber1and.John CPT MIL
Subject: Us v. PFC BM (Article 32)
Attachments: Delay of Article 32 Investigation (ManningB).pdf: 11-Apr-25-
Govemment Request to Delay Artide 32 (ManningB).pdf; 11-Apr-28-Defense Response to
Government Request for Act 32 Delay (ManningB).pdf
Sir,

Good evening. Attached is a approved delay request For the Article 32
investigation. If you would like a copy of the enclosures of the Government
and Defense memorandums, please let me know and I will send them separately.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29400

022 949

1 FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY
Fro--= Almar-za~Pa-alt

Sent: Monday, May 2, 20]] 9.06 AM

To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Cc: Carlilte. Monica L. SFC USA SJA

. Matthew kemkes

orrow .loDcan, CPT USA
Egan, Michael IV
ouchard, Paul PT USCENTCOM USF-

.3
1






Subject: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

Thank you. CPT Fcin. No med fot the enclosures at this timc.

All - earlier I had mcnnoncd I was going to be acmated. but those actn anon orders have been revoked My email address
thus ncmains best way to mach mc.

LTC Almatwa

FOR 0 I CIAL LY

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 294??

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Thursday. May 26, 2011 6:26 PM

To: Almanza, Pau!

Cc: Matthew kernkes; Morrow Ill. JoDean. CPT USA

JFHQ-NCRIMDW Bouchatd. Paul CPT USCENTCOM USF-I
Haber1and,John CPT MIL Overgaatd, Angel M.
CPT USA . Arthur 0. W01 USA Joshua

Tooman
Subject US v. PFC BM Article 32 Delay Request
Attachments: Delay o1Ar1ic1e 32lnves1iga1ion (ManningB).pdf

LTC Almanza,

Good evening. Please find attached an Article 32 delay approval signed by the
In an effort to assess the prosecution, defense, and Article 32
investigation I0's information security capability, are you able to sign and
emails on your 003 computer or using your DOD CAC card?

Thank you.

v/
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219490

29402

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





rm-= Arms-nzaw Pam
Sent: Friday, May 27, 201 I 8:56 AM
To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA
Cc: Matthew kemkes
Morrow Ill. JoDean. CPT USA
Bouchard. Paul CPT USCENTCOM
>n
Overgzaard. Angel M. CPT USA
Ford. Arthur D. W01 USA JFHQ-
NC SJA Joshua Tooman
Subject: RE: US PFC BM Article 32 Delay Request
Thank you. CPT Fein.

I have classi?ed email addresses (both the Scene! and TS-SCI levels). bu! cannot sign or anylling on my system
using my DOD CAC card.

LTC Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02884707 29403

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Monday, May 30. 2011 11:38 AM

To: Almanza. Paul

cc: Matthew kernkes; Morrow JoDean. CPT USA

Bouchard. Paul CPT USCENTCOM USF-I USCENTCOM-TDSIFICL
;?HaberIand,John CPT MIL Overgaard, Angel M.
CPT USA Ford, Arthur D. wo1 USA SJA: Joshua
Tooman

subject: RE: US v. PFC BM Article 32 Delay Request

Sir,

Thank you. There is currently and no projected need For or
level email capability. we are analyzing our capability to
UNCLASSIFIED emails to protect against any possible ?hacker? threat.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29404

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY

AImanza.vau?j>

Sent: TuesdayTo: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Cc: Matthew kemkes
Morrow Ill, JoDean, CPT USA

Bouchard. Paul CPT USCENTCOM





9




Haberland.Jo PT MIL USA

Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA
Ford, Arthur D. W01 USA JFHQ-
Joshua Tooman

Subject: RE: US v. PFC BM Article 32 Delay Request

CPT Fcin -
OK. I'll look imo gelling ability I0 cncr} pl unclassi?ed email: using a DOD laptop that ms :1 card reader.

LTC Alman/a

F0 OF I LY



FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29405

From: Fein. Asnden CPT USA SJA

sent: Tuesday, May 31 2011 9:19 AM

To: 'PauI.Almanza@usdoj.gov'

cc: Matthew kemkes; Morrow Jooean, CPT USA
SJA: Bouchard, Paui CPT USCENTCOM USF-I
Overgaard, Angel M.
CPT US ord, Adhur D. W01 USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA:

Subject: Re: US v. PFC BM Anlcle 32 Delay Request

Sir. If you need help setting this up please let us know.
Vr CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 294??

From: Ford, Arthur D. WO1 USA SJA
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:35 AM
To: Hall Cassius Mr FMMC (FTMYER)



- erto, eatnz A - MDW Morrow JoDean,
CPT USA Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW
Whyte, Jeffrey H.CPT USA

Waybright, Daniel W. SGT USA

SJA
Subject: Test Document (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attachments: Test Document.pdf

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO

Everyone,

Attached is an PDF ?ile, that has been with your CAC certificates.
This is a test 0? the software. The intent is that you can open it with your CAC
card, but no one else can open the file and view the contents. This is the method we will
use for all discovery, so it is imperative that we fix any issues now.

Please send me an email today acknowledging your ability to open the attachment. If
you cannot open the attachment, please reply with the text of any error messages.

Thank you very much.



H01 Arthur Ford
Legal Administrator
OSJA, USAMDN
202-685-1975
571-289-9690

1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





02198672 29407

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Ford, Arthur D. wor USA

Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 8:12 AM














To: Hall Cassius Mr FMMC (FTMYER)
Fein, Ashden CPT USA
. Feito, Beatriz SGT USA
JFHQ- SJA Morrow loDean,
CPT USA SJA
Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA SJA
Whyte, Jeffrey I-I.CPT USA JFI-IQ-
SJA
Vvayb?ght
Daniel W. SGT USA SJ A

Subject: Test Document (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attach: Test Document.pdf

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO

Everyone,

Attached is an PDF file, that has been with your CAC certificates.
This is a test of the software. The intent is that you can open it with your CAC
card, but no one else can open the file and view the contents. This is the method we will
use for all discovery, so it is imperative that we fix any issues now.

Please send me an email today acknowledging your ability to open the attachment. If
you cannot open the attachment, please reply with the text of any error messages.

Thank you very much.


WO1 Arthur Ford

Legal Administrator
OSJA, USAMDW

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: OUO

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02215250 29403

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY












From:
Sent: Tuesday. June 28. 2011 459 PM
To: Ford, Arthur D. W01 USA SJA
Cc: Hall Cassius Mr FMMC (FTMYER)
Matthew kemkes
Fein. Ashden PT USA
SJA Feito, Beatriz SGT USA
JFHQ- SJA Morrow JoDean.
CPT USA SJA
Overgaard. Angel M. CPT USA SJA
Whyte, Jeffrey H.CPT USA JFHQ-
Waybright, Daniel A JFHQ-N SJA

Subject: [Suspected RE: Test Document (UNCLASSIFIED)
Mr. Ford,

I was able to open you test document.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Of?ce of David E. Coombs

11 South Angeli Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Office: 1-800-588-4156

Fax: (508) 689-9282

uumermxcoummemaideterasegqm

Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attorney-
client information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this
information may be unlawful and is

FOR OFHCIAL USE ONLY

02884715

29409

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:

LTC Almanza,

Good evening.

.
Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA



Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:40 PM

'A|manza, Paul?

Matthew kemkes; Morrow JoDean, CPT USA
SJA: 'HabeI1and,John CPT MIL
Overgaard, Angel M. CP JF - DW Ford, Arthur D. W01 USA JFHQ-
?Joshua Tooman?

US v. PFC BM Article 32 Delay
Delay of Anicle 32 Investigation (ManningB).pdf

Please Find attached an Article 32 delay approval signed by the

1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29410

Fm-=

Sent: Wednesday. July 27, 201 1 8:36 AM
To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA
Cc: Matthew kemkes




Morrow JoDean, PT USA




Arthur D. WOI USA SJA
Joshua Tooman
Subject: RE: US v. PFC BM Anicle 32 Delay

Thank you. CPT Fem.

LTC Almanza

F0 OF I IA LY

02914759

Ftonu

To:

Sub?nz
Attachments:



LTC Almanza,

Good evening.


Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

29411

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

I

Fein, Asnden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Monday. August 29, 2011 7:29 PM

?AImanza. Paul?

Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill. JoDean. CPT USA
'Habet1and.Jotm CPT MIL
Overgaatu. Angel M. - Fotd, Arthur D. W01 USA JFHQ-
?Joshua Tooman'

Us v. PFC BM Atticle 32 Delay

Delay of Article 32 Investigation (ManningB).pdf

High

Please Find attached an Article 32 delay approval signed by the

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219486

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

29412

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Almam Pal?

Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12.59 PM

Fein, Ashden cm" USA SJA

Matthew kemkes



Arthur D. W01 USA SJA
Joshua Tooman
RE US v. PFC BM Article 32 Delay

Thank you. CPT Fein.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02916314



29413

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





From: Fein. Asnden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Wednesday, September 28. 2011 5:08 PM

To: 'Almanza. Paul?

cc: Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill. JoDean, CPT USA

Haberland.John CPT MIL Overgaard. Angel M. CPT
- ooman,Joshua CPT MIL Us USA
coombsaarmycounmamaldefenseoom

subject: US v. PFC BM (Art 32 Delay)

Attachments: Delay of Anlcle 32 Investigationpdf

Sir,

Good afternoon. The granted an additional delay of the Article 32
investigation. Please see attachment.

v/

CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29414






FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Fro-n= Almam Pan!
Sent: Thursday. September 29, 2011 11:15 AM
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA
Cc: Matthew kemkes Monow Ill, JoDean, CPT USA
SJA
Overgaard. Angel M. PT
USA SJA
Subject: Re: US v. PFC BM (Art Delay)
Thank you. CPT Fcin.
LTC Almama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02916045 29415

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 3:52 PM

To: ?Almanza. Paul?

cc: Morrow JoDean. CPT USA Ford, Arthur D. W01 USA JFHQ-

NCRIMDW
subject: RE: Us v. PFC BM (Article 32)
Sir,

Mr. Coombs is in transit. He might be available around 1730 today. IF not,
are you available tomorrow For a short ten minute conversation?

Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219478 29416

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





From: Almanza, Paul
Sent: Thursday. November 10. 201 I PM
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Cc: Morrow JoDean. CPT USA SJA
Ford Arthur D. WOI USA JFHQ-

SJA


Subject: RE: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

Yes. lam available tomomow. other than I 1-noon As I'll be out of the office. I won't have the ability to patch in a coticteme line.

I would. however. be available for a call at 1730 today (my evening meeting is at 7 out in Reston).
Sony for my relative unavailability today and tomorrovt.

FYI. I'll be out of the office next Wednesday through riday on official travel. otherwise do not have leave or work
travel plans other than Novcnber 25. the Friday after Thanksgiving.

LTC Almania

F0 IC LY

02216333 29417

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:

Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 7:25 PM

To: Almanza, Paul

Cc: SJA







Ford Arthur D. W01 USA .IFHQ-
Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-
Matthew kem kes




SJA
SJA




Paul Bouchard
Joshua Tooman -

Subject: [Suspected RE: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)



All.

I am sony that I haven't been able to respond sooner. I am available anytime tomorrow after I300. Also, I can
host the conference call on my 40l-744-3007 number.

Best,
David

Daw'd E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs
II South Angell Street, #3l 7
Providence. RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156
Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282




"??Con?dentiaIity Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is prohibited.??

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 294?

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Thursday, November 10. 2011 10:22 PM

To:

Cc: Morrow JoDean. CPT USA SJA: Fond. Atthur D. W01 USA JFHQ-

SJA: Matthew kemkes;
Subject: Re: [Suspected RE: us v. PFC BM (Article 32)
Gents,

I an available after 1300 as well. I propose a time 1000 on Monday so all can celebrate
Veterans day? If not available then tomorrow?

Thank you .

Vr CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





29419

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Almanza Pa-we

Sent? Friday. November 2011 6:55 AM

To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA


Cc: Morrow JoDean, CPT USA SJA
Ford, Anhur D. WOI USA JFHQ-
Matthew kemkes
il;





Subject: Re: [Suspected RE: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

10 am on Monday works for me, and Happy Veteran's Day, all.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29420

From:
Sent: Friday, November II, 2011 8. l4 AM

To:






Cc: Morrow .loDean, CPT USA SJA
ord, Arthur D. WOI USA WHO-
Matthew kemkes
Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Subject: [Suspected RE: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

All.

1000 on Monday works for me as well. Just let me know which number I need to call on Monday.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

ll South Angell Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: l-800-588-4l56

Local: (508) 689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282



"?Con?dentiality Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure. copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is prohibited.?"

IAL LY

02948986 29421

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fem. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Friday, November 11. 2011 9:43 AM

To:

Cc: MOITOW Ill, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NC . ur D. W01 USA JFHQ-

SJA: Matthew k?mkes?':
Subject: Re: [Suspected RE: US v. PFC BM (Anicie 32)
Gents.

I will initiate the call at 1600. Please send the numbers you would like me to call. Thank
you.

Happy veterans day!

Vr
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29422

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

mm-= mmanzuaur

Sent? Sunday. November 13, 20]] 8:18 PM

To: rem. Ashden on USA SJA







Cc: Morrow JoDean, CPT USA SJA
Ford, Arthur D. USA WHO-
Matthew kemkes

Subject: Re: [Suspected RE: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

My "umber

Thanks.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFIUAL USE ONLY

02916079

29423

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Subject:
Attachments:

Importance:

LTC Almanza,

Good afternoon.

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Wednesday. November 16, 2011 5:26 PM

Ahnanza.Paul

Matthew kemkes: Morrow JoDean. CPT USA
JFHQ-NCRIMDW Overgaard. Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA: Paul
Bouchard; Joshua Tooman; Waybright, Daniel (Article 32)

Delay of Anicle 32 Investlgationpdf; 111116-Special for
Article 32.pdf

High

Attached you will find the order to restart the Article 32

investigation and special instructions associated with conducting the investigation.
Additionally, attached is a delay approval by the

The United States is working on finalizing your administrative and security support. we are
receiving assistance from outside organizations so that you will have dedicated support. SGT
lvlaybright (cced) is currently the paralegal assigned to assist you; however, there will be a
permanent replacement designated in the next few weeks.

The United States is ready to move forward at the soonest available date, IAN the

order.

Thank you and have a good evening.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





?2m3?6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29424







From:

Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 5:40 PM

To: Paul Almanza

Cc: Matthew kemkes Morrow JoDean, CPT USA
SJA Ovengaard Angel

M. CPT USA SJA






Joshua Tooman
Waybright. Daniel W. SGT USA
Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-

Subject: [Suspected RE: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

LTC Almanza,

The defense requests a start date of 16 December. Given the proximity to the holidays, the defense requests that
we conduct the hearing through the weekend of the I7 and l8th and into the following week. If the hearing is
not completed by the 23rd, the defense requests that we resume the hearing on the 3 January 2012.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

ll South Angell Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free; 1-800-588-4156

Local: (503) 689-4616

Fax: (503) 689-9282



Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure. copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219467 29425

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY
From: Almanza, Paul

Sent: Wednesday, November 16. 201 1 6:23 PM
To:
Cc: Matthew kemkes Morrow Ill, JoDean, CPI USA






SJA
M. CPT USA SJA






SGT USA SJA Fein,
Ashden CPT USA SJA

Subject: Re: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

Counsel -

I regnet that I can't cleany read the documents on my blackberry (I am on official travel out of the country), but I have
of course need the emails below.

While of course I'm not making any decisions without reading the pdfs. the defense scheduling request seems
reasonable. 00 you have any objections to it, Govemment?

Thanks.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02916075
FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29426
From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Wednesday. November 16, 2011 6:39 PM
To: Almanza, Paul;
Cc: Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill, JoDean. CPT USA Overgaard, Angel
M. CPT USA SJA:
Waybright, Daniel w. so USA SJA
Subject: RE: US v. PFC BM (Anicle 32)

Sir,

The United States does not object and also recommends we conduct the hearing through the 17th
and 18th.

v/r
CPT Fein



FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29427

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 2:19 PM

To:
Subject: ec

Sir. Mr Coombs and I spoke this morning and are not sure whether you confirmed we would start
on the 16th. Could you please confirm. Thank you.

Vr CPT Fein

1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29428


From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Monday. November 21, 2011 7:41 AM

To: Almanza. Paul;

Cc: Matthew kemkes; Morrow JoDean, CPT USA Overgaard, Angel

M. CPT USA
Waybng . ame . SJA

Subject: v. Fc (Article 32)

Sir,

Good morning. The United States does not object to starting the Article 32 on 16 Dec and
working through the weekend. Does that date work For you and if so, we would like to start
making the administrative plans to execute Day 1 on 16 Dec. Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





?22?9?5? FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29429
no-n= mam. Pam

Sent: Monday. November 21, 2011 10.05 AM
To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Cc: Matthew kemkes Morrow Ill, JoDean, CPT USA





Ovemaard, Angel




SJA
M. CPT USA SJA






Wavb?ght. Daniel W.




SGT USA SJA
Subject: RE: us v. PFC BM (Article 32)

CPT Fein -

Thank you. We will start on 16 Dec and will work though the weekend on I7-18 Dec and into the following week. Any objection to
the Defense's suggestion that if the hearing is not concluded by 23 Dec. we reconvene on Tues 3 Jan??

LTC/umama

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02916059

Subject:

Sir,

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2943?

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Monday, November 21, 2011 10:20 AM

Almanza, Paul;

Matthew kemkes; Motrow JoDean. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW Overgaard. Angel
M. CPT USA ?ii;

Waybright, Daniel W. SGT USA SJA
v. (Article 32)

The United States does not object to a delay between 24 Dec 11 and 3 Jan 12, assuming the
defense intended that we continue to work until COB on the 23d. The United States requests
that you exercise your authority to exclude this time as reasonable excludable delay under

ac:-1 7a7(c).

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





FOR OFFICIAL us?: ONLY 2943?



From:

Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 5:46 PM

To: Paul Almanza

Cc: Matthew kemkes Paul Bouchard








Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA .

Morrow IH, JoDean, CPT USA SJA



Subject: Defense 505(h)(3) Notice
Attach: 505(h)(3) Noticepdf
LTC Almanza,

Please see that attached defense notice.

v/r
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs
11 South Angel] Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156
Local: (508) 689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282




Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?2?39?26 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29432



From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 5:58 PM

To: Paul Almanza

Cc: Matthew kemkes; Paui Bouchard; Joshua Tooman; Morrow Ill, Jooean. CPT USA JFHQ-

NCRIMDW Melissa Santiago
Subject: RE: Defense 505(h)(3) Noiice
Sir,

The United States acknowledges receipt.

V/r
CPT Fein

F0 LY

02216248 29433

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: coombs@armycourtmarti aldefense.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 4:12 PM
To: ?~1manza.Pamj>








Morrow .loDean, PT USA
Overgaard, Angel


el W.
Fein,

Cc: Matthew kemkes
SJA
M. CPT USA SJA






Wa bri t,Dani






SGT USA SJA
Ashden CPT USA SJA

Subject: Defense Request for Evidence
Attach: Defense Evidence
LTC Almanza,

Please see the attached request for evidence production.

v/r
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

ll South Angell Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282




Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the petson(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unautho?zed disclosure. copying or use of this information may be
unlaw?il and is

FOR USE ONLY



?22?9?5? FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29434

rm-n= Aimanza-.PauIm>

Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:28 PM
To: Fein_ Ashden CPT USA

Morrow JoDean, CPT USA

Cc:
Overgaard, Angel





Waybright, Daniel W.




SGT USA SJ A
Subject: RE: Defense Request for Evidence

Thank you, Mr. Coombs.
CPT Fein, i? appreciate any government response to this defense request by C08 Wed Nov 30.

I note for all that I have only been provided with procedural documents and the charge sheets. Accordingly, I do not yet
know which witnesses I intend to have present at the investigation, or what evidence I intend to consider. I will thus
shortly be sending out a notification letter that simply says I'll be providing that information by December 7. As we
discussed, the hearing will start on 16 Dec; while we didn't speci?cally mention a time, I assume there's no objection to

0830.

One other housekeeping question: other than Mr. Coombs and CPT Bouchard, are there any other defense counsel on
the case? I see CPT Tooman on the addressee list, but the online directory doesn't list him as being in TDS.

LTC Aimanza

OR 0 K: IA LY

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29435

Fro"-=

Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:30 PM

To: Almanza, Pw
Fein, A

Cc: Matthew kemkes Monow Ill, JoDean, CPT USA
SJA Overgaard. Angel
Daniel W.




SGT USA S1 A
Subject: RE: Defense Request for Evidence



I neglected to note mat I've also been provided with an ERB. Sorry for the omission.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29436

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY

From:
Sent: Wednesday. November 23, 201i 3:36 PM
To: mmanzavauwe






Cc: Matthew kemkes Morrow Ill, JoDeanFem,
Ashden CPT USA SJA

Subject: [Suspected Defense Request for Evidence

LTC Almanza,

The defense does not have an objection to a 0830 start. The TDS counsel detailed to this case are MAJ Kemkes
and CPT (P) Bouchard. CPT Tooman has not been detailed to the case. Instead, he has been assigned to assist
the defense given his duty location.

v/r
David

David E. Coombs. Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

ll South Angeli Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508) 689-9282

defense.com

Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, plwse
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this infotmation may be
unlawful and is prohibited.?"

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





02219451

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

29437

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

mmam. ram

Wednesday. November 23, 20] 3:37 PM


Matthew kemkes
SJA
M. CPT USA SJA






Morrow Ill, JoDeanAshden CPT USA SJA

RE: Defense Request for Evidence

Thank you, Mr. Coombs.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219444

29438

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY








From: Almanza, Paul

Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 201 1 4:17 PM

To: Matthew kemkes

Fein, Ashden CPT
- A
Cc: Morrow JoDca.n, CPT USA SJA
Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-
USA SJA

Subject:

Attach: art_32_not_ltr_l I231 .pdf

All -

Please ?nd attached the notification letter I mentioned in my email below.

May all of you have a Happy Thanksgiving.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY







02938167 29439

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein. Asnden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Friday. November 25. 2011 1:16 PM
To: Almanza. Paul; Matthew kemkes;
I
Cc: Morrow JoDean. CPT USA Overgaani. Angel M. CPT USA
Waybrigm, Daniel W. SGT USA
SJA
Subject: RE: Defense Request for Evidence
Sir,

Thank you. The United States will respond by C08 wed, 30 Nov. Additionally, the United
States recommends that we have an 802-like conference starting at 0830 and then go on the
record at 0900.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
From: Almanza, Paul?>

Sent: Monday, November 28, 20! I 10:57 AM

To: Fein, Ashden cp-r USA xmoaucn/Mow sm



Cc: Matthew kemkes
Morrow Il1,JoDean,
A JFH -N JA
Overgaard. Angel M. CPT USA JF - A

Subject: RE. Defense Request for Evidence

Thank you. CPT Fem I think an 802-like before we begin on 16 December makes sense.

Also. if possible I'd like to nenew the documentary evidence before the hearmg Would you be able to support that if 1 were at Fon
Meade (or McNair. if that's more convenient) from I2-I5 December??

LTC Almaxua

. . . FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY




FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2944?

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

sent: Monday. November 28.2011 12:56 PM

To: Ahnanza.Paul

Cc: Matthew kemkes;
SJA;Chuga nge .


subject: RE: Defense Request for Evidence

Sir,

The United States will have its documentary case ready by 12 December 2911. Based on the
voluminous amount of data, we intend to provide you a secure laptop computer along with
digital productions of the evidence (DVDs). The defense will receive digital copies of the
information we provide you, although they have already received the information in discovery.
After you start reviewing the information and decide that you would like any of the
information printed, we can arrange to have the material printed and brought to Fort Hc?air
prior to the hearing and to Fort Meade for the hearing. we have already arranged for a
dedicated office at Fort Mcuair that you can may use before and after the hearing.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02216229

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





29442

From: coombs@armycourtmarti aIdefense.com
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2: 14 PM
To: Paul Almanza
Cc: Matthew kemkes Paul Bouchard
Joshua Tooman
Fein, Ashden CPT USA A
Morrow IoDean, CPT USA A
SJA
Subject: Defense 405(h)(3) Motion
Attach: Defense 405(h)(3) Motionpdf
LTC Almanza,

Please see the attached defense motion.

v/r
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

11 South Angell Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282



Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please

notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02216224 29443

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 201 1 1:36 PM
Paul A1manZa?













Cc: Matthew kemkes Paul Bouchard
Joshua Tooman

Melissa Santiago Fein, Ashden CPT USA IFI-IQ-
A Morrow JoDean, CPT USA
SJA Overgaard, Angel
M. CPT USA SJA

Subject: 32 Noti?cation Acknowledgement

Attach: Manning

LTC Almanza,

Please see that attached document.

v/r
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs
11 South Angel] Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-5884156
Local: (508) 689-4616

Fax: (508) 689-9282




Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlaw?tl and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219427

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

29444

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Almanza. Pam ow

Tuesday, November 29. 201 1 2;22 PM

Matthew kem kes



Paul Bouchard
Joshua Tooman












Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-
Monow Ill. JoDean, CPT USA
Angel

Melissa Santiago
SJA
SJA
M. CPT USA SJA

RE: 32 Noti?cation Acknowledgement

Thank you, Mr. Coombs.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02216214 29445

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Kemkes. Matthew MIL USA
Sent: Wednesday. November 30, 2 1

To: Aknanza.PauI
Cc: Tooman. Joshua
CPT MIL US USA Fain, Ashden Morrow Ill,

JoDean. cer USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW Overgaard. Angel M. on USA .u=Ho-
NCRIMDW waymgm. Daniel w. SGT USA SJA
Subject: RE: us v. PFC BM (Article 32) (UNCLASSIFIED)
Signed By:

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats; F000

Sir,

I acknowledge the Article 32 schedule running from 16-23 December and
resuming, if necessary, on 3 January. while I do not expect it will be an
issue, I would like to bring to your attention that I begin ILE at Fort
Belvoir on 5 January. Therefore, if we are unable to complete the Article 32
in ten days (16-23 December, 3-4 January). the defense will request that we
complete the proceeding on 7-8 January rather than 5-6 January.

Respectfully,
MAJ Keltkes

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219417

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

29446

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

?mam Paul

Wednesday, November 30, 20]] 3:38 PM

Manhew kemkes

CPT MIL CS USA TRADOC
USA SJA
JoDean. CPT USA A
Overgaard. Angel M. PT USA SJA

Waybright, Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQ-








Tooman, Joshua
Fein, Ashden (Article 32) (UNCLASSIFIED)

Thank you for the informaubn. MAJ

LTC Almanza



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29447

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:09 PM

To: Aunanza.Pau|

cc: Kemkes, Matthew MIL

Tooman, Joshua CPT MIL US USA TRADOC: Morrow
JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW Ovengaatd. Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-
Waybright, Daniel W. SGT USA SJA

Subject: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)

Attachments: 111130-Govemment Response to Defense Request 11 Nov 11.pdf

LTC Almanza,

Good evening. Attached is the government's response to the defense's
request for production pursuant to RCM 405. we are working on a response
for the defense's RCM 40S(h)(3) request and RCM 505(h)(3) notice.

Additionally, below are a few more administrative issues for you:

1. The government recommends you set the uniform for the hearing to the
duty uniform? Army Combat Uniform (ACU).

2. The government recommends you order the hearing room to have the same
prohibitions as a court-martial IAN the U.S. Army Rules of Practice Before
Army Courts-Martial, Rule 6.3 (Prohibitions). This will apply to members of
the hearing, spectators, and press.

3. Your hearing security officer (H50) and the alternate have been
designated and listed below. Both work on the U.S. Army 62 staff and are
detailed to you full-time when needed. Mr. Prather is waiting your
instructions. Primary: Mr. Jay Prather,


Alternate? Mr?- Rick Ennis:

4. By COB Friday, the government intends to publish to you a compilation of
references for national security litigation cases. The intent is to provide
this reference source for you, your legal advisor, and your Hsos. we will
provide the defense a copy.

5. Based on MAJ Kemkes' delay request, the United States recommends that if
the hearing is not completed by COB on 23 Dec, the hearing not restart until
7 Jan, so support personnel, security personnel, witness travel and
government and defense TDYs can be consolidated into one period starting 7
Jan and not 3-4 Jan and then breaking for two days and restarting. This
will minimize the projected impact on Fort Meade and reduce the cost of
TDYs. The United States also requests that if the hearing breaks on 23 Dec,
that the time between 24 Dec and the restart of the hearing be excludable
time.

Thank you.
v/r

CPT Fein

1

FOR OFHCIAL USE ONLY

29443

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 10:15 AM

vau1Awmanzaj>

Cc: Matthew kemkes
Tooman,Joshua A
Morrow oDean, CPT USA JA

Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-
SJA Waybright, Daniel W.
SGT USA SJA Fein,

Ashden USA SJA

Subject: [Suspected RE: US v. PFC BM (Article 32)













LTC Almanza,

The govemment?s response to the defense request for production of evidence mistaken treats the request like a
standard discovery request. The defense request is not a discovery request, it is a request for production of
evidence at the Article 32 under R.C.M. The defense will ?le a compel motion later today
detailing its position on this issue.

Additionally, the defense would like to respond to some of the administrative matters raised by the government.
1) The defense does not object to ACUs being the duty uniform;

2) The defense does not object to the government's request to follow Rule 6.3, however, the defense does
request that we allow co?ee, soda, or other drinks in the courtroom by the parties if the beverage is in a covered
container;

3) No issues;

4) The defense simply requests to be provided with an advanced copy of the materials that the government
intends to provide in order to ensure that there are no issues;

5) The defense requests that you not decide this issue at this time. Instead, the defense requests that you wait to
detemiine whether this is even an issue. We may be able to complete the hearing by the 23rd. In the event that
we do not, I believe that we will be in a position to determine how many more days are required. If only a
couple of more days are required, then we should start up on 3 January as planned. If more than two days are
required, the defense still requests that we start on the 3rd. The issue raised by MAJ Kemkes is that after 4
January, he will only be available on the weekends. If we follow the government's recommendation, we may be
in a position of not completing the hearing on the 8th and being required to postpone until the 14th of Januaiy.
In any event, this is not an issue that we need to decide now.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

ll South Angell Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29449

anial defensecorn

Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attorney-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. Ifyou are not the intmded recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this infonnation may be
unlawful and is

FOR USE ONLY



02216173
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2945?
From:
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 201 1 4:30 PM
To:

Cc: Matthew kemkes
Tooman,Joshua
Morrow JoDean, CPT USA SJA
Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-






SGT USA IFHQ-

Ashden CPT USA
Subject: Defense Motion to Compel
Attach: Defense Compel Production Motionpdf; Appendix A-G.pdf
LTC Almanza,

Please see the attached defense motion to compel production of evidence.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

11 South Angel] Street, #317

Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508) 689-9282





Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219409 29451

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
From: Almanza Paul

Sent: Thursday. December I. 2011 5:04 PM
To:
c:







Waybright. Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQ-
Fein, Ashden CPT USA

Subject: Defense Motion to Compcl

All-

I?ve received the defense's motion to compel and the government's response to the defense?s request for production of
evidence, as well as the emails on administrative topics emails eariier today.

I anticipate making a determination on these issues over the next several days.

Government, would it be possible for me to come to MDW to see the documentary evidence you anticipate providing me and
also the list of witnesses you intend to provide either Monday or Tuesday morning next week? This would enable me to prepare
my list of evidence I intend to consider and witnesses I intend to hear from by next Wednesday, December 7.

Thank you.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29452



From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Thursday. December 01. 2011 7:03 PM

To: Almanza. Paul;

cc: Matthew kemkes; Tooman,Joshua CPT MIL US USA
Monow Jooean. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA: Overgaard. Angel M. CPT
USA Waybright, Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Subject: RE: Defense Motion to Compei

Sir,

He can have the information ready. we recommend Monday morning because the information is
voluminous. we intend to publish our proposed witness and evidence list tomorrow and it will
include applicable discovery BATES numbers for defense to reference.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY





02219407 29453

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
From: Almanm, Paul

Sent: Friday. December 2, 2011 9:18 AM
To: Fcin. CPT USA SJA




Cc: Matthew kemkes
Tooman.JoshuaJ CPT MIL US USA TRADOC
Morrow JoDean. CPT USA SJA

Ov aard, An e] M. CPT USA 117110-
SJA Waybright, Daniel W.
SGT USA A

Subject: RE: Defense Motion to Compel

OK. lhanks. CPT Fcin 0800 Monday

LTC Almarrm

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02938912

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29454

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Sent: Friday. December 02, 2011 9:21 AM
To: Almanza. Paul:
Cc: Matthew kemkes; Tooman.Joshua CPT MIL US USA

Morrow Jo an. JF SJA: Angel M. CPT

USA Daniel W. SGT USA SJA
Subject: RE: Defense Motion to compel

Sir,

0890 is good. He will have your office temporarily ready and a classified computer available
to review the material. By COB today, we will submit our proposed evidence and witness
lists. The evidence list will include associated BATES numbers so the defense will know
exactly what information we are requesting you to consider and what information we are
providing you to preliminarily review.

v/r
CPT Fein



02914783


From
Sent
To:

Cc:

Subject
Attachments:

Sir,

29455

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Friday. Deoembet 02. 2011 8:50 PM

Almanza. Paul

Matthew kemkes:
Tooman.Joshua CPT MIL US USA Morrow an, -
NCRIMDW Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA Daniel


US v. PFC BM (Witness and EvIdence Lists)

111202-Govemment Witness List (Artlde 32).pdf; 111202-Govemment Evidence List (Anlcle
32)pdT

Attached are the government's proposed witness and evidence lists.
Additionally, the classified enclosures to the evidence list will be available
For your review on Monday and the enclosures are available for the defense's

inspection .

This weekend, we intend to email a proposed hearing ?rules? poster and a
response to the def-ense's RCM 48S(h)(3) request.

V/r
CPT Fein



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29456

From:
Sent: Fnday, December 2, 20ll 11:01 PM
Tm ~manza,Paun




Cc: Matthew kemkes
Tooman, Joshua PT MIL A TRAD
Morrow JoDean, CPT USA SJ A
Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA IFHQ-
Waybright, Daniel Ashden CPT USA SJ A
Melissa Santiago

Subject: Defense Witness List
Attach: Defense Witness
LTC Almanza,

Please see the attached defense witness list.

Best,
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Of?ce of David E. Coombs

11 South Angell Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282



Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is prohibited.*"

I LY

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29457

From:
Sent: Sunday, December 4, 201 11:39 AM

To:
Cc: Matthew kemkes






Tooman, Joshua CPT MIL US USA TRADOC
Morrow JoDean, CPT USA SJA






SGT USA SJA
Fein, Ashden CPT USA

Subject: Available witnesses and evidence

LTC Almanza,

Pending your ruling on availability of witnesses, the defense would like to provide you with advanced notice of
its intent to object to alternatives to testimony under R.C.M. 405(g)(4)(A) and Similarly, the defense
will object to consideration of alternatives to evidence under R.C.M. 405(g)(5)(A) and

v/r
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law Office of David E. Coombs

11 South Angell Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508) 689-9282




Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?29?5"5 FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY 29458

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 12:38 PM

To: Almanza, Paut

Cc: Matthew kemkes
Tooman. Joshua CPT MIL us USA Morrow Ill. 0 n.


NCRIMDW Ovengaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA: Daniel
W. SGT USA .FHQ-NCRIMDW Melissa Santiago

Subject: us v. PFC BM (Govt Response 3. Admin)
Anactlnonts: 111204-Response to Defense Request to close 32 Hearinopdf; Rules of Hearing
v1.pdf

LTC Alnanza,

Good afternoon. Attached is the government's response to the defense RCM
40S(h)(3) request. Also, attached is the government's proposed "Rules of
Hearing" modeled after Rule 6.3 of the Army Trial Judiciary Rules of court.
The United States intends to post these rules at the entry control points for
the hearing.

NLT 0755 tomorrow morning, SGT waybright will be downstairs in the entry way
of the OSJA, HOW to escort you to your office and provide you a sterile
classified computer and the material listed on the prosecution's requested
evidence list. SGT Haybright will continue to serve as your temporary
administrative support, until the permanent support is assigned by 15 Dec 11.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02216142 29459

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent: Sunday. December 4, 2011 4:45 PM

rm AImanuPauI
Cc: Matthew kemkes






Tooman, Joshua
Morrow Ill, JoDean, CPT USA SJA
Overgaand. Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-

SJA Wavbn'p.ht. Daniel W.




Fein, CPT USA
Subject: Sealed Defense Response
Attach: Defense 405(h)(3) Responsepdf; Attachment A.pdf
LTC Almanza,

Please see that attached defense response to the government's 405(h)(3) ?ling.

Best.
David

David E. Coombs, Esq.

Law O?ice of David E. Coombs

ll South Angeli Street, #317
Providence, RI 02906

Toll Free: l-800-S88-4156

Local: (508) 689-4616

Fax: (508)689-9282



Notice; This transmission, including attachments, may contain con?dential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure. copying or use of this information may be
Lll?lI3W?.lI and is prohibited.""

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02219406

29460

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY









From: Almanza, Paul
Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 7:25 PM
To:
Cc: Matthew kemkes
Morrow JoDean, CPT USA SJA
iI>; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA
Wayb?ght. Daniel W.
SGT USA JFHQ-N
-N SJA

Subject: Re: Available witnesses and evidence

Thank you, Mr. Coombs.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02915373

29461

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:

Sir,

Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA
Monday. December 05. 2011 8:22 AM
Almanza, Paul

Matthew kemkes;
Tooman. Joshua CPT MIL US USA Monow Ill. an. -
NCRIMDW Overuaatd, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW Daniel
W. SGT USA .FHQ-NCRIMDW Melissa Santiago

US v. PFC BM (Prmective Onders)

Protective Onder for Classi?ed Informationpdf:
Protective Otder for LES lnformationpdf; Protective Order for SecArmy
15-6.pdf

Attached are the three protective orders currently in place by the
The first is for classified information. The second is for the SecArn1y 15-6
and any derivative material. The third is for federal grand jury and sealed
documents, and law enforcement sensitive material.

we will provide you a copy with acknowledgments for you to sign. Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02927372 29452

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Monday. December 05, 2011 11:29 AM

To: Atmanza, Paul

Cc: Parra, Jairo A. W01 USA

Monow ill, JoDean. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA: Kornkes. Matthew NHL Feito.
Beatriz SGT USA JFHQ- NCRIMDW SJA
Subject: Lodging 8. TDY

LTC Almanza,

The prosecution and defense will be TOY during the Article 32. we budgeted For you, your
H50, and admin support to be TDY as well. Please let us know if you would your legal advisor
present and TDY. Please coordinate through SGT Feito and H01 Parra (both Cced) to setup your
DTS and ensure its properly Funded.

Thank you.

v/r

CPT Fein

FOR OFHCIAL USE ONLY

?29?93? FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29463

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Monday, December 05. 2011 1:53 PM

To: Prather, Jay Mr CIV USA OSA

Cc: Almanza, Paul; Waybrighrl, Danie! W. SGT USA

Kemkes. Matthew MIL Morrow Ill, JoDean,
CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA
Subject: (U) Request for Security Of?cer Support. ANJA-CL Memo dated 15 Nov 11

Mr. Prather- I will defer to LTC Almanza for any instructions. He is Cced
on this email.

LTC A1amnza- Mr. Jay Prather is your appointed security expert and is ready
to be onsite at Fort Mc?air starting Monday (12 Dec), if you need him. we
will have workspace available For him.

Thank you.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02

0291 5723

29464

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 8:43 PM

To? Ahnanza.Paul

Cc Matthew kemkes

VV SJA:
engaa . JFHQ-NCRIMDW Daniel W. SGT USA


subject: US v. PFC BM (Govemment Response to 505)

Attacllnents: 111205-Response to Defense Notice Under MRE

Sir,

Attached is the government's response to the defense MRE request.
we intend to provide you a response to the defense's witness request by C08 on

Wednesday, 7 Dec 11.
Have a good night.

v/r
CPT Fein

03

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29465

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Prather, Jay Mr CIV USA OSA

Sent: Tuesday. December 6. 2011 10:34 AM

To: Fcin, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Cc: Almanza. Paul

Wavbriilht. Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQ-
SJA

Matthew kemkcs
Morrow JoDean. CPT USA








SJA
Subject: RE. (U) Request for Security Officer Support. ANJA-CL Memo dated 15 Nov 11



Is any need to have my clearance sent via
If so. ptovidc SMO Code.



lav R. Pmlinr

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



?29?9359 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29466



From: Fein. Asnden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 10:49 AM

To: Prather, Jay Mr CIV USA OSA

Cc: Atmanza, Paul; Waybright, Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW
Matthew kemkes; Morrow Ill. JoDean. CPT USA
JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA

Subject: RE: (U) Request for Security Of?cer Support. ANJA-CL Memo dated 15 Nov 11

Jay,

Thank you. As of now, there is no requirement to have your clearance info
sent. we have JPAS and currently plan to only work at the "secret"
collateral level.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

05

02219398

29467

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY







From: Prather, Jay Mr cw USA OSA
Sent: Tuesday, December 6. 2011 11:00 AM
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Cc: Almanza, Paul Daniel W. SGT USA
SJA
Matthew kemkes
Morrow I11. JoDean. CPT USA
SJA
Subject: (U) Request for Security Officer Support. ANJA-CL Memo dated 15 Nov I I
No worries
Thanx

06

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

0221 9397

29468

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY






From: Armanza. Paul
Sent: Tuesday. December 6. 201 I I24 PM
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Prather, Jay Mr USA OSA
Cc: WaybrighL Daniel W. SGT USA SJA
iI>;
Mat ew em es Morrow JoDean. CPT USA
SJA
Subject: RE. (U) Request for Security Of?cer Support. ANJA-CL Memo dated 15 Nov 11
Thank you. CPT Fem

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29469

Fro-n= Almam Paul

Sent: Tuesday. December 6, 2011 1:26 PM
To: Fcin. CPT USA SJA
Cc: Parra, Jairo A. W01 USA

Morrow Ill. JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-
Matthew kcmkes
Feito, Beatriz SGT USA JFHQ- SJA




Subject: Lodging TDY

All-

I live within commuting distance (48 miles, actually), of Ft. Meade and plan to commute there each day. I will ask the
H50 if he'd like to be there TDY and will discuss this matter with my legal advisor as well.

I anticipate getting back to you on this later today or tomorrow.
Thank you.

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



02927378

29470

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Suh?un:

Sir,

Thank you.

Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Tuesday, December 06, 2011 3:41 PM

Almanza, Paul

Parra, Jairo A- W01 USA
Monrow JoDean, CPT USA Matthew kemkes; Feito. Beatriz SGT
USA JFHQ- NCRIMDW SJA

RE: Lodging TDY

For your consideration, the main reason counsel are going to be

I
I TDY with rental cars is For physical security and then For time efficiency

purposes.

we recommend that you stay at a hotel or, at a minimum, rent a

car to drive to and -From another Army installation to prevent any potential

security issues.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



29471

FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY

?mam PM

Sent: Tuesday, December 6. 2011 5:15 PM

To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Cc: Parra, Jairo A. W01 USA
SJA Morrow Ill. JoDean. CPT USA JFHQ-





kcmkes
Feito. Beatriz SGT USA JFHQ- A




SJA

Subject: RE. Lodging TDY



Drank you as I had not even thought of the security issues. That may
change my llnughls on driving from home.

I spoke to Mr. Further and LTC Holzer today about TDY.

Mr. Pmther of course \\1'Ilbc present tlloughout the lx:an'ng_ but did
not request TDY. I'll speak to him totnonow with this additional
information.

I'd like LTC to be ptcsent thnoughout the baring. He requests
TDY.



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

10

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29472

Feln. Ashden CPT USA SJA

Son: Tuesday. December Q. 2011 5:53 PM

To: Aunenza,PauI

Cc: Pam. Jalm A. W01 USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SIA:
Momow Joboan, CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW Matthew kemtes; Feito. Beatriz 861'
USA JFHO- SJA

.8unqacb RE t4xxingIl1Irv

Sir,

Thank you. we can wsolutely accommodate all. Please have each of our
experts, if they require TDY to call 561 Feito or Mr. Par-ra and
provide their SSH. Once she has it, then she can work the line of
accounting through DTS and the authorizations.

v/r
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Undaaeilied_Emai|_Anic|e_32_01 1 1



02941501 29473

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRIMDW SJA
Sent: Tuesday. December (B. 2011 5:56 PM
To: Almanza. Paul; Matthew kemkes;

mn.bwua CPT MIL US USA TRADOC: Monow Ill.
ean. Overgaard. Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-

NCRIMDW Waybrighl. Daniel W. SGT USA SJA

Cc: Holzer. Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG
Subject: RE: Contacts with Counsel and Legal Advisor
Sir,

Thank you. The United States also has a national security litigation reference CD that we
comiled and would like to mail to all participants. we would like to have them in the nail
tomorrow morning, but request nailing addresses for you and LTC Holzer. He already have the
deFense's addresses.

Thank you.

v/
CPT Fein

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

12

02219392

29474

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY



Fro-n= Anmanza. Pam
Sent: Tuesday, December 6. 20! 1 6:25 PM
To: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Matthew kemkes
. Tooman,.Ioshua CPT
MIL US USA TRADOC Morrow JoDean, CPT
USA SJ A Overgaard.
Angel M. CPT USA SJA
Waybrig,hL Daniel W. SGT USA IF HQ-
SM
Cc: Holzcr, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG
Subject: RE: Contacts with Counsel and Legal Advisor
CPT Fcin -

My mailing address is

Thanks

LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

13

02219390

^

Prom:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Signed 8^:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29475

Holzer.Mart^LTCMIL USA OTJAG [(b) (6)
j
Wednesday.December07,2011 8:30AM
Fein. Ashden CPT USAJFHQNCR/M0WSJA;A1manza. Pad;
coombs@annycourtmartia1detense com; Matthew kemkes; (b) (6)
;
Tooman, JoshuaJCPT MIL USUSA TRADOC; MonowllL JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MOW SJA; Overgaard, AngdMCPT USAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA; WaybrighL Danid
WSGTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MOWSJA
RE: Contacts with Counsel and Legal Advisor (UNCLASSIFIED)
(b) (6)
^

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n : UNCLASSIFIEO
Caveats: NONE
CPTFein,

F^ysical screening of inciting mail t o t h e Pentagon w i l l cause considerable delay in
delivery. I f y o u can have i t ready today, I w i l l send someone toMDWtopick i t up after
1609.
v/r
LTC Mark Holzer

Unclassified^Email Article 32 0114

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02941461

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29476

Fein. /Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA

Wednesday. December 07, 2011 8:34 AM
Holzer, Mari^ LTC MIL USA OTJAG; Almanza, Paul;
coombs@annycourtmartialdefense.com; Matthew kemkes;(b) (6)
Tooman, Joshua J CPT MIL US USA TRADOC: Monow 111, JoDean. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Waybright, Daniel
W. SGT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
RE: Contacts with Counsel and Legal Advisor (UNCLASSIFIED)

Sir,

Wewill have i t readyfor pick upat the front officeoftheOSJA, MOW. Thankyou.
v/r
CPTFein

a.

Unclassified Email Article 32 0115

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219389

From:
Sent:
To:

29477

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Alraanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 5:50 PM
Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG (b) (6)
coorabs@arraycourtraartialdefense.cora; Matthew kemkes

;
>;

(b) (6)

Cc:
Subject:

; Tooraan, Joshua J
>; Morrow BI, JoDean,
CPT MIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
>;
CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Overgaard, Angd M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
; Waybright, Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG (b) (6)
; Prather, Jay R Mr
CIV USA OSA (b) (6)
Review of evidence

CPT Fein As you mayrecall,I plan to review evidence from 12-15 December in preparation for the hearing. I'd like to do so without
inconveniencing more people ttian is necessary.
Would it be more convenient for me to come to MDW to do that, or wodd it be more convenient for me to do thai at Fort Meade?
Thanks.
LTC Almanza

unctessifed Email « , * 32 OUS

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02921094

From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29478

Fein./\shden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Wednesday. December 07. 2011 6:29 PM
Almanza, Pad; Holzer, Marie LTC MIL USA OTJAG;
coombs@armycourtmartia1defense.com; Matthewkemkes: (b) (6)
Tooman, Joshua J CPT MIL US USA TRADOC: Monow 111, JoOean. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Waybright, Daniel
W. SGT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Holzer, Mart< LTC MIL USA OTJAG; Prather. Jay R Mr CIV USA OSA
RE: Review of evMence

Sir,

We recommend you reviewthe evidence at l^W. We have an office reserved on
the f i r s t floor that w i l l be dedicated to you and w i l l have a safe for you to
lock your computer and notes.
We are finalizing the prosecution's reply tothe defense witness request and
should have i t out inthe next fewhours. Also, we intend to sutimit an
additional evidence l i s t .
Could you please let us know by tomorrow, i f possible, whether the proposed
Rules ofHearing are sufficient so that we canhave posters created for the
hearing?
Additionally, we were going to mail the Resource COto you today, but realized
that you w i l l likely get i t faster ifwe leave i t for you in your office on
Monday or hand deliver the CO tomorrow. Would you like the CO before weekend?
I f so, could you please provide us your work address and we w i l l deliver the
CD tomorrow. Wemailed Mr. Coombs his copy and delivered a copy to MAJ kemkes
today.
Thank you.
v/r
CPTFein

Unclassified Email Article 32 0117

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219387
From:

Sent:
To:

29479

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 6:52 PM
Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG (b) (6)
coombs@armycourtmartiddefense.com; Matthew kemkes

l>;
il>;

(b) (6)

Cc:
Subject:

; Tooman, Joshua J
CPT MIL US USA TRADOC(b) (6)
Morrow UI, JoDean,
CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
Overgaard, Angd M CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; WaybrighL Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA >
Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG >; Prather, Jay R Mr
(b)
(6)
CIV USA OSA
l>
RE: Review of evidence

AUThree iicns;
1. nireviewthe evidence at MDW from 12-15 Dec. thanks. Please leavetiieCD in the office Hi be using and HIreviewit on
Monday.
2. The Rules of Hearing arc good with one nunor change to track the language of Rule 6.3. On the fourth bdkl please amend it to
read "Cell phone, radios, pagers. iPods. BlackBerry s. and similar dev ices are not allowed in the hearing unless they are com|4eteiy
tumed off."
3. Intightof the pending govemmentresponseto the defense witnessreqiKSt.1 will not be submitting my witness and evidence list
todav . as I had stated in my 23 Nov ember ineinoraiidum. I will submit thai list as soon as possible.
Thankyou.
LTC Ahnanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0118

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

-#:"
02219384

From:
Sent:
To:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29480

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Wednesday, December 7. 2011 6:12 PM
coombs@amiycourtmartiddefense.com; Matthew kemkes
(b) (6)

Cc:
Subject:

; Tooman,Joshua J CPT
MIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
>; Morrow III, JoDean, CPT
USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA ; Overgaard,
Angd M CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
>; Waybright. Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
, Fdn, Ashden CPT USA
JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA >
Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG (b) (6)
>; Prather, Jay R Mr
CIVUSA OSA >
US v PFC BM (Article 32) - administrative matters

AllRegarding administrative matters:
1. The uniform f o r t h e hearing will be ACUs.
2. We will follow Rule 6.3, with the prov/iso that the parties may have water, soda, or non-alcoholic drinks in a covered
container.
3. I've spoken to Mr. Prather and he will be present throughout the hearing.
4. Should the govemment not have provided an advance copy of the national security litigation materials to the defense
for revnew before mailing the CDs, I'll of course consider any objectkins or additional materials the defense may have.
5. The issue of when to re-start the hearing should it not be completed by COB 23 Dec is not yet ripe. I anticipate our
being able to determine by the 21 or 22 Dec (a) whether continuing the hearing in January is necessary; and (b) if so,
how many more days are needed, if only 2 days would be necessary, then we can re-start on 3-4 Jan. If it is clear that
more than 2 days are necessary, then we can discuss at that time whether it makes more sense to start on 3 Jan or 7
Jan. Ifwe do not conclude the hearing by COB 23 Dec, 1 anticipate that any break between 24 Dec and the restart of the
hearing would be exdudable time. (Please note that I am required to complete the investigation by 16 January and do
not have the authority, absent a request t o the convening authority, to grant any delays that would prevent me from
meeting that deadline.)
Thankyou.
LTC Almanza

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Unclassified Email Article 32 0119

02219383

From:

Sent:
To:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29481

Alraanza, Paul >
Wednesday,Deceraber 7,2011 6:25 PM
coorabs@annycourtraartialdefense cora; Matthew kerakes
(b) (6)

Cc:

Subject:

aiLTooraan,JoshuaJCPT
MIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
>;Morrow III, JoDean, CPT
USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Overgaard,
AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
l>;Fein,Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW
SJA(b) (6)
>
(b)
(6)
Holzer, MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
ail>
USvPFC BM (Artide 32) requestforlegd advice

Counsels
1am providing notice t h a t l i n t e n d to askLTCHolzerfor legal advice concerning the defense requestforaclosed hearing
under RCM 405(h)(3), and intend to provide him the defense^s28 Nov motion, the goyernment^s4Dec response, and
the defense's4Dec reply.
Thankyou.
LTC Almanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0120

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02921090

From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29482

Fein.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ^NCR/MDWSJA
Wednesday,December07.20t1 7:22 PM
Almanza, Pad; Holzer,MarteLTCM1L USA OTJAG;
coombs@armycourtmartia1defensecom; Matthewkemkes: (b) (6)
;
Tooman,JoshuaJCPT MIL US USA TRADOC: Morrow IIL JoDeanCPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard,/^gdMCPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA; WaybrighL Daniel
WSGTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MOWSJA
Holzer,MarteLTCM1L USA OTJAG; Prafher,JayRMrCIVUSA OSA
RE: Review of eyklence

Sir,

Thank you. The United States acknowledges a l l threeof your emails. As for
^2 below, we requestthe language remain the same as we provided on the draft
request. We acknowledge that i t is a deviation from Rule 6.3; however because
the United States intends to present classified information during the
hearing, our security experts recommend prohibiting the items and not just
ordering them turned off. I apologize for not pointing this out on the front
end. Additionally, we could amend the proposed rule to allow for "hearing
participants only" to be authorized, i f you and counsel would like to have
their cell phones in your offices.
v/r
CPT Fein

Unclassified Email Article 32 0121

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219380

From:

Sent:
To:

Almanza, Paul >
Wednesday.December 7,2011 7:26 PM
Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJEHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Holzer,MarkLTCMILUSAOTJAG(b) (6)
coombs@armycourtmartialdefensecom; Matthewkemkes
(b) (6)

Cc:

Subject:

29483

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

I>;
;

ooman, JoshuaJ
CPTMIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
>;Mon^ow IILJoDean,
(b) ;
CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA(6)
Overgaard,AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
; WaybrighL DanidWSGTUSAJFHQ(b)
(6)
NCR/MDWSJA
il>
l>;Prather,JayRMr
Holzer, MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG(b) (6)
(b)
(6)
CIVUSAOSA>
RE Review ofevidence

CPTFeinRe^2. understood. Please leave the language unchanged.
LTC Ahnanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0122

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219379

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Alraanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Wednesday, Deceraber 7, 2011 8:12 PM
coorabs@armycourtraartialdefense.cora; Matthew kerakes

From:

Sent:
To:

(b) (6)

; Tooman,Joshua J CPT
MIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
l>; Morrow III, JoDean, CPT
USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Overgaard,
Angd M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW
SJA Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG (b) (6)
>
US V. PFC BM (Artide 32) - Gov't Evidence List question

Cc:
Subject:
CPT Fein -

One question concerning your requested evidence list. Is the entry at para. le(2)(r) (forensic report concerning
"NIPRNET Computer 144.107.19") complete? All the other computers identified have four digit addresses.
Thanks.

29484

^

LTC Almanza

Undassified Email Article 32 0123

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02916043

From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29485

^
Fein.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MOWSJA
Wednesday,December07,2011 8:29 PM
Almanza, Pad; coombs@annycourtmartia1detense.com; Matthew kemkes;
(b) (6)
Tooman.JoshuaJCPT MIL US USA TF^DOC; MonowllL
JoDean,CPTUSAJFHQNCF^DW SJA; Overgaard.AngelM. CPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MDWSJA
Holzer.Mart^LTCMIL USA OTJAG
RE: USy.PFCBM (Artide 32)-Govt Evidence List question

Sir,
The f i l e name f o r t h e f o r e n s i c r e p o r t i s ^^NIPRNETcomputer 144.197.19^.
IP address f o r the computer i s 144.197.17.19.

However, t h e actual

v/r
CPTFein
Original Message
From: Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
I
Sent: Wednesday, Oecen^er 97, 2911 8:12 PM
To: coombsQarmycourtmartialdefense.com^ Matthew kemkes;(b) (6)
:
Tooman,Joshua JCPTMILUS USATRAOOC; Morrowlll, JoOean, CPTUSAJFHOI^R/^SJA;
Overgaard, AngelM. CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA; Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHONCR/^ SJA
Cc: Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG
Subject: USv. PFCBM (Article 32)

Govt Evidence List question

CPTFein^
One question concerning your requested evidence l i s t . Is the entry at para. le(2)(r)
(forensic report concerning ^^NIPRNET Computer 144.107.19^) complete? A l l the other computers
identified have four digit addresses.
Thanks.
LTC Almanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0124

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

•^JIFirrw;

02219378

From:
Sent:
To:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 8:34 PM
Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA coombs@armycourtmartiddefense.com; Matthew kemkes
(b) (6)

Ce:
Subject:

29486

>;

; Tooman,Joshua J CPT
MIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
>; Mon-ow BL JoDean, CPT
USAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Overgaard.
Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG (b) (6)
RE: US V. PFC BM (Article 32) - Gov't Evidence List question

OK, tiianks.
LTC Ahnanza

Undassified Email Artide 32 0125

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02915562

From:
S«it:
To:
Cc:

-4

Subject:
Attachments:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29487

Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRAADW SJA
' ' - »'
Wednesday, December 07. 2011 8:56 PM
Almanza, Paul
Monow 111, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Oveipaard, Angel M. CPT USA
JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Whyfe, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MOW SJA; Waybright,
Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; coombs@annycourtmartialdefense.com:
Kemkes. Matthew J MIL USA; Paul Bouchard; Tooman.Joshua J CPT MIL US USA
TRADOC: Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG
US v. PFC BM (Multiple Docs)
Rules of Hearing vl .pdf; 111207-Response to Defense Request for Artide 32 Witnesses.pdf;
111207-Additional Requested Evklence List for Artide 32 lnvesfigation.pdf

Sir,

Attached are the following three documents:

1. Another copy of the Rules of Hearing Version 1. I want to make sure from your previous
two emails, that this is the exact version you approve.
2. The government's response to the defense request for Article 32 witnesses.
3. The government's request for
v/r
CPT Fein

Unclassified Email Article 32 0126

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02216130

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:
^

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29488

coombs@arraycourtraartiddefensecora
Thursday,Deceraber8, 201110:01 AM
Alraanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Matthew kerakes (b) (6)
Mort^ow IB, JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; Overgaard, AngelM CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA ; Fein, Ashden CPTUSA
JFHQ NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>; Melissa Santiago
(b) (6)

Subject:

Administrative Issues

LTC Almanza,
The defense would like to raiseacouple of adrainistrative issues:
1) The defense requests that ati restraints be reraovedfi-oraPFCBM prior to him being taken to the courtroora.
The defense also requests that he be perraitted tohave paper andapen to fake notes;
2) Iwiti submitaciviliandefensecounsel notice of appearance on the 16th The notice witi witi provide you
withraygeneral inforraation and qualifications forthe record;
3) The defense intends to conductabrief voir dire of you Looking atthe Article 32 scripL itraakesthe raost
sense to do that afieryouaskPFCBM whether he has any questions conceming hisrighttopresent anything
that heraaydesire in defense,raitigation,or extenuation
BesL
David
DavidE Coorabs, Esq
Law Office ofDavidE Coorabs
IlSouthAngeti SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TotiFree:1 800 588^156
Locd: (508)689 4616
Fax:(508)689 9282
^OiOI^bs@aiTny^c^^^^^
^^^^^^arraycourt
***Confidentia1ityNofice:Thisfransraission, including affachraents, may contain confidentid attomeyclient
information and is intended forthe person(s)or corapany naraed Ifyou are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete all copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use ofthis inforraationraaybe
unlawful and is prohibited.***

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219376

From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Signed By:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29489

Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG [(b) (6)
Thursday,Oecember08, 2011 11:22 AM
Fein,Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCF^MDWSJA;A1manza, Pad;
coombs@arraycourtmartia1defense.com; Matthew kemkes; (b) (6)
L
Tooman,JoshuaJCPTMIL US USA TRADOC; MonowllL JoOean,CPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard, A n g d M C P T U S A J F H Q N C R / M D W SJA; WaybrighL Danid
WSGTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
Prather,JayRMrC1VUSA0CSG2
Reference CD password (UNCLASSIFIED)

( (b) (6)
b
)
C l a s s i f i c a t i o n : UNCLASSIFIEO
(
Caveats: NONE
6
)

CPTFein,
Request password for the reference CO.
Thank you,
v/r
LTC Mark Holzer

Classification: UNCLASSIFIEO
Caveats: NONE

Undassified Email Artic1e 32 0128

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

Mr

02921675

From:
Sent:
To:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCF(/MDW SJA
Thursday, Oecember 08, 2011 11:56 AM
(b) (6)
Holzer, Mari< LTC MIL USA OTJAG; Matthew kemkes; Morrow 111,
JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Whyfe, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA;
(b) (6)

Subject:

29490

RE: Reference CO password (UNCLASSIFIED)

Sir,

The password is "Art32: Password for the Article 32". Include spaces,
v/r
CPT Fein

Undassified Email Article 32 0129

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02216123

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:
Attach:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29491

coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.cora
Thursday,Deceraber8, 2011 12:56PM
Alraanza, Paul >
Mon^owIB,JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, AngelM CPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
; Whyfe, JeffreyHCPT
USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
; WaybrighL
DanidWSGTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
>; Matthew kerakes
(b) (6)
; Paul Bouchard (b) (6)
>;Tooraan,
JoshuaJCPTMIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
l>;Holzer,Mark
LTC MIL USA OTJAG;Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MDW SJA >; Melissa Santiago
(b) (6)
>
Defense Request to Corapel Production ofwitnesses
Request to Corapel Wimesses pdf

LTC Alraanza,
Please see the attached request to corapel fhe production ofthe defense requested witnesses Thedefense
requestsamling on the production of witnesses atyour earliest convenience.
BesL
David
DavidE Coorabs, Esq
Law Office ofDavid E.Coorabs
IlSouthAngeti SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TotiFree:1 800 588^156
Locd: (508)689 4616
Fax:(508)689 9282
coorabs@arraycourtmartialdefense.com
^^Bww,at^ycourtma^^^
***Confidentidity Notice: Thisfransmission,including attachraenfs,raaycontain confidential attorney-client
inforraation and is intended forthe person(s)or corapany naraed Ifyou are not the intended recipiem, please
notify the sender and delete ati copies. Unauthorized disdosure, copying oruse ofthis inforraationraaybe
unlawful and is prohibited.***

Unclassified Email Article 32 0130

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02938076
ML/

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29492

Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MOW SJA
tet
,
Thursday, December 08,2011 4:01 PM
;
coombs@armycourtmartia1defense.com; Almanza, Paul
Morrowlll, JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard, AngdM. CPTUSA
JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Waybright,
Daniel W. SGT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Matthew kemkes; Paul Bouchard; Tooman,
Joshua J CPT MIL US USA TRADOC; Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG; Melissa Santiago
RE: Oefense Request fo Compel Produdion of Witnesses

••'f...
Sir,

In short, the United States maintains i t s objections.
1. We acknowledge the rights of the accused under RCM 405(f). However, we
would l i k e t o highlight that there is no documented precedence that empowers
the defense to use the Article 32 investigation t o explore a l l possible
theories of mitigation and extenuation for matters that would only be
potentially relevant during the sentencing phase of the t r i a l , i f any. As you
w i l l see in Garcia, the Court, in dicta, quotes Article 32 stating the
"accused has the right to present anything he may desire in his own behalf[,]"
but actually rules on the v a l i d i t y of an Article 32 waiver. The defense's
proffered testimony i s not relevant to the charged misconduct or any
mitigation or extenuation evidence towards the alleged acts of the accused
(IAW the charge sheet). The defense i s simply trying to use the Article 32 as
a vehicle t o openly explore alleged failures of the chain of command which are
not relevant t o charges, thus outside the scope of RCM 405 and your charter.
In fact, the defense uses the statement "each of these witnesses can provide
different insight into the events that transpired between 1 November 2009 and
27 May 2010[;]" however based on the defense's proffer, the "events" are not
related t o alleged criminal acts of the accused, but the actions of others who
interacted with the accused.
2. RCM 405(g)(1)(A) purposely limits witness production for witnesses that
are both relevant and not cumulative. Each witness the United States objects
to based on cumulative testimony, i s i n fact cumulative with others on the
witness l i s t . The purpose of the Article 32 i s to conduct a "thorough and
impartial investigation of a l l matters" and that can s t i l l be accomplished by
receiving testimony by multiple other witnesses with similar access to
information, proximity t o the accused, or part of the same j o i n t
investigation.
3. As for any witnesses t e s t i f y i n g about alleged mental health issues, i t
does not appear from the defense's proffered testimony that the defense
intends t o present testimony as to the accused's having partial mental
responsibility for the alleged crimes; therefore these witnesses are not
relevant to the charges, including mitigation or extenuation on the merits.
The United States responses are based solely on defense's proffered testimony.
The United States does not argue with the defense that a diminished capacity
amounting t o a partial mental responsibility defense could be relevant as
mitigation and extenuation.
4. The defense's witnesses who they proffer w i l l t e s t i f y about alleged
Articles 13 and 37 violations are not relevant. Our analysis under #1 above
applies as well. Additionally, defense's proffered Articles 13 and 37

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29493

02938076

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY
violations are matters reserved for the convening authority p r i o r t o referral
and ultimately a military judge at a court-martial, i f this case is referred.
The substance of these matters and the fact they allegedly occurred afterthe
commission of the alleged offenses make these witnesses not relevant to the
accused's alleged misconduct, thus outside the scope ofyour investigation.
5. Thedefense misrepresents the government's position in Footnote 1. The
United States did not state in its responsethat itwould not entertaintravel
for defense witnesses based on their production being "too costly and
troublesome." The United States w i l l entertain the defense's request for
witnesses that are not relevant or cumulative and based on your determination
of availability and method of production, w i l l produce the witnesses.
Additionally, the United States intends to request some of its witnesses be
called telephonically, rather than in person, but cannot make that request
until you make a determination on which witnesses you w i l l call as the
investigating officer. As of today and absent the government's request to
have the senior ranking government officials declared not reasonably
available, the United States has not objected to the personal appearanceof
any witnesses, boththe government's or defense's. The United States has
objected to you considering certain witnesses based on relevance and/or
cumulative production. However, the United States does intend to make future
requests to have some witnesses testify telephi^ically to minimize costs,
depending on which witnesses you ultimately order to be produced and are
reasonably available.
6. TheUnited States objects toyour consideration ofArticle 131, Perjury,
as a reference in determining whether a statement is properly sworn. Article
131 is a punitive article intended to criminalize sworn statements by
Servicemembers during a judicial proceeding. The original classification
authority (OCA) reviews are simply sworn statements made "under penalty of
perjury" I^28US.C. 1746. Ratherthan Articlel31, theUnitedStates
recommends you consider Article 134, False Swearing, and specifically the
portion underthe explanation which states, " [ i j t does not include such
statements made in a judicial proceeding or course of justice, as these are
under A r t i c l e l 3 1 , perjury
" See MCM, part IV, paragraph 79c(l). Underthe
defense's proposed analysis, theonly sworn statements thatyou could consider
during t h i ^ investigation, are previously sworn statements given under oath at
an Article 32 investigation or court martial.
Additionally, I addedCPTHunterWhyteto our emails. He is another
government counsel.
Thank you.
v/r
CPTFein

UnclassifiedEmailArtide320131

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216116

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29494

coombs@armycourtmartiddefensecom
Thursday.December 8, 2011 420 PM
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Mon^ow IILJoDean, CPTUSA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; Overgaard, AngelMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>;Whyte,JeffreyHCPT
USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>, WaybrighL
DanidWSGTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
>; Matthewkemkes
(b) (6)
(b) >;Tooman,
>; Paul Bouchard (b) (6)
(6)
JoshuaJCPTMIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
l>;Holzer.Mart^
LTC MIL USA OTJAG>; Melissa Santiago
(b) (6)
Fein, AshdenCPTUSAJEHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)

Subject:

RE: Defense Request to Compd Production ofwitnesses

LTC Almanza,
Justaquick response to conectacouple of statements by govemment counseL The govemment's position on
tiierelevanceoftherequestedwimess(botiiunitandmenfd health wimesses)"asonlybeingrdevantduring
sentencing" is erroneous If needed, the defense y^tifileaseded^:ir-^^^^ motion to explain its theory of
relevance on the merits
,^
Adedarationunder28USC Section 1746 isan'^Unswom StatementB^ As sucb, unlikeswom statements
under 2823, these statements are not admissible over defense objection unless signed during the Article 32
hearing Aplamreadingof28USCSectionl746andRCM 405(h)(l)(A)undercutstiiegovemment's
position The analysis to Article 13Ialso reaffirms the defense's position
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs, Esq
Law Office ofDavidE Coombs
IISoutiiAngeti SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TollFreel^OO-588-4156
LocaL (508)689^616
Fax:(508)689 9282
coombs@armycourtmartiddef^nsecom
wwwarmycourtmartiddelensecom
***Confidentidity Notice: Thisfransmission,induding attachments, may contain confidentid attomey-client
infbrmation and is intended Ibrthe person(s)or company named Ifyou are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete all copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use ofthis information may be
unlawful and is prohibited ***

UnclassifiedEmail Artide 32 0132

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219362

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29495

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
' '
Friday, December 9, 2011 9 25 AM
;^
coombs@armycourtmartiaIdefense.com
- ^.i
Matthew kemkes Morrow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA >; Fein, Ashden CPT USA
(b)
(6)
JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA <
>; Melissa Santiago
(b) (6)

Subject:
Attach:

RE: Administrative Issues
al manza_2-1 resumel. pdf

Mr. Coombs 1. Your request Is reasonable. I intend to grant it subject to the limitations of my authority as IO. While in the
courtroom, PFC BM will not be in restraints and may have paper and pen to take notes, subject of course to appropriate
security procedures. I will request that PFC BMbe removed from any restraints prior to being taken to the courtroom.
2. Thank you.
3. Re voir dire, attached are my most recent DA Form 2-1 (basically a reserve version ofthe ORB) and my most recent
civilian resume. 1 intend to prepare a script and circulate it to the parties in advance of the hearing for your review.
LTC /Umanza

Undassified Email Artide 32 0133

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02216102

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29496

coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com
Friday, December 9, 2011 9:34 AM
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
Mon-ow HI, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, Angel M CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
il>, Fein, Ashden CPT USA
JFH()-NCR/MDW SJA il>; Melissa Santiago
(b) (6)
l>
RE: Administrative Issues

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:
LTC Almanza,

Thank you for the additional information.
Best,
David

r

David E. Coombs, Esq.
Law Office ofDavid E. Coombs
11 South Angell SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
Toll Free; 1-800-588-4156
Locd: (508)689-4616
Fax: (508) 689-9282
coombs(%armvcourtmartialdefense.com

m$m:.amymwrmM.iWd.d!mse..Qom
•••Confidentiality Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain confidential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named If you are not the intended recipiem, please
notify the sender and delete all copies, Unauthorized disdosure, copying or use oftiiisinfonnation may be
unlavkffiil and is prohibited ***

Undassified Email Artide 32 0134

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02947939

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29497

Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MOW SJA
'
'
Friday. December 09, 2011 9:43 AM
Almanza, Paul; coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com
Matthew kemkes; (b) (6)
Monow III, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Oveigaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MOW SJA; Melissa Santiago;
Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MOW SJA
RE: Administrative Issues

Sir,

Thank you. The cormnand w i l l ensure he is restraint free while in the courtroom.
w i l l s t i l l be present.
v/r
CPT Fein

Undassified Email Article 32 0135

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

His escorts

02916426

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29498

Fein,/^hden CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Friday,0ecember09, 2011 1:48 PM
Almanza,Paul
coombs@armycourtmartia1defensecom; Kemkes, MatthewJMIL USA;
(b) (6)
Tooman, JoshuaJCPT MIL US USA TRADOC; Monow IIL
JoDean. CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard.AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA; Whyfe.JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA; Holzer.MarkLTCMIL
USAOTJAG
U S v P F C B M (Admin)

Sir,

Good afternoon. TheUnited States recommends the followingtwo administratiye measures:

1. At 1399, on Thursday IS Oec 11, you and your security officer meet the prosecution and
defense at the Fort Meade courtroom t o conduct an administrative walk-through of the site and
a full-dress rehearsal of (1) closing the hearing; (2) opening the hearing; and (3)
controlling any disturbances. TheUnited States i s developing proposed ^ B a t t l e O r i l l s ^ for
each of these processes and intends t o s i t down with the defense prior t o 15 Oec 11 and work
out the details. Our intent i s that the prosecution and defense present the j o i n t proposal
of '^^Battle D r i l l s ^ and we rehearse them when you come up for your admin walk-through.

2. For planning the proper security, press, and administrative coordination, the United
States recommends that we go on the record each day starting at 0999. We recognize that the
time could change based on a multitude of factors, but having a starting point w i l l allow for
battle rhythm devel^:^^nt for each o f t h e functional areas.

3. By COB today, the United States w i l l provide you the POC at 1 ^ for your arrival on
Monday. SFC Oavis, FortMeade, OSJA i s your dedicated paralegal f o r t h i s investigation. I f
he i s not available on Monday at Fort McNair,then the M i l i t a r y j u s t i c e Division w i l l provide
^ou a temporary assistant.

v/t^
CPT Fein

Undassified Email Article 32 0136

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216093

29499

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

coombs@armycourtmartiddefense.com
Friday, December 9, 2011 1:52 PM
AJmanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
(b)
(6)
Matthew kemkes
;
l>;
Tooman, Joshua J CPT MIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
Morrow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
>, Overgaanl. Angd M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT
>; Holzer, Marie
USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
LTC MIL USA OTJAG (b) (6)
; Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA >

Subject:

RE: US v PFC BM (Admin)

LTC Almanza,
The defense has no issues with the govemment's requests.
BesL
David
David E. Coombs, Esq.
Law Office ofDavidE Coombs
11 South Angdl SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156
Locd; (508)689-4616
Fax: (508) 689-9282
copmbs@ann
www.armyfxiurtm artiddefense.com

^

***Confidentiality Notice: Thisfransmission,including attachments, may contdn confidential attorney-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipiem, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawfiil and is prohibited.***

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219360

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29500

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Friday, December 9,2011 5 19 PM
coombs@armycourtmartiddefense.com
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
;
Tooman, Joshua J CPT MIL US USA TRADOC (b) (6)
;
Morrow III, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, Angel M CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT
USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA >; Holzer, Marie
>; Fdn. Ashden CPT USA JFHQLTC MIL USA OTJAG NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>; Prather, Jay R Mr CIV USA
OSA (b) (6)
>
RE: US v. PFC BM (Admin)

Thank you, Counsd. These recommended administrative measures are approved. 1 added Mr. Prather, my security
officer, as a cc.
LTC Almanza ;



^•t

., , . . .

, ,o..«

Unclassified Email Article 32 0138

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02216082

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29501

coombs@armycourtmartiddefense.com
Sunday, Deceraber 11,2011 6:14 PM
Alraanza, Paul ;
Matthew kerakes Mon-ow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
il>; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA ; Fein, Ashden CPT USA
(b)
(6)
(b)
(6)
JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
>; Melissa Santiago
(b) (6)

Subject:

Telephonic 802

LTC Almanza,
I was wondering if we could have a quick 802 on Monday to discuss some of the remaining issues? I am open
just about anytime after 1030.
BesL
David
David E. Coorabs, Esq.
Law Office ofDavid E. Coombs
I I South Angell Sfreet, #317
Providence, RI 02906
Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156
Locd: (508) 689-4616
Fax: (508) 689-9282
.CQ.Q.mb5.@.armyeourtoartid^^
.www.annycourtra^

***ConfidentidityNotice:Thisfransraission, induding attachraenfs, may contdn confidential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s)or company named Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete ati copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying oruse ofthis inforraation may be
unlawfiil andis prohibited ***

U^SSISed Em.„ A«e 32 0,39

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02919097

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:15 PM
coombs@armycourtmartia1defense.com; Almanza. Paul
Matthew kemkes;(b) (6)
.mil; Monow III, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MOW SJA; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Melissa Santiago
RE: Telephonic 802

Subject:
Sir,

The government has no issue, but requests the call after 1599. Wewill be
movingour office in the morning in order topr^parefor the Article 32.
Thank you.
v/r
CPT Fein

}. f

-A

29502

y

Unclassified Email Article 32 0140

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219357

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Sunday, December 11,2011 10:34 PM
Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>;
coombs@amiycourtmartialdefense.com
Matthew kemkes ;
Morrow III, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>, Overgaard, Angel M. CPT US.A JFHQ(b)
(6)
NCRMDW SJA
l>;
(b) (6)

Subject:

29503

Re: Telephonic 802

Counsel Tm available am lin» tomorrow, but given the gov emmert's availability, we shoukl plan for 1500.
Thanks, and talk to you then
LTC Almanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0141

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02216078

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

coombs@armycourtmartiddefensecom
Sunday,December1L201111:I7PM
Almanza, Paul (b) (b) (6)
>;Fein,Ashden CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW
(6)
SJA(b) (6)
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
MorrowIILJoDean, CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, AngelMCPTUSA JEHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
;
(b) (6)

Subject:

29504

RE Tdephonic802

(
b
)
(
6
)

LTC Almanza,
1500will work with the me Iwould like to discuss the outstanding issues regarding which witnesses will be
produced, die production of evidence motion, and the defense's closure motion.
BesL
^
David
DavidE Coombs,Esq
Law Olfice ofDavidE Coombs
IlSouthAngeti SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TollFree:1 800 588 4156
Locd: (508)689^616
Fax; (508)689-9282

i^oombs@^tiiiy^oi^rtm
yyyyw.armycourtmartiddefen
***Confidenfiality Notice Thisfransmission,including attachments, may contain confidential attomey-client
information and is intended Ibrthe person(s)or company named If you are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete ati copies Unauthorized disdosure, copying or use ofthis infbrmation may be
unlawful and is prohibited ***

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219354

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29505

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Monday, December 12,2011 2:46 PM
coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com; Fein, Adiden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW
SJA Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
Morrow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; Overgaard, Angel M CPT USA JFHQNCRMDW SJA (b) (6)

Subject:

Re: Telephonic 802

All-

rm at MDW. The number in the office where I'm woridng (b) (6)
I dont think fhis phone has a conference line, so CPT Fein,
caH. please let me know.

(b 12.
)
if there's(6)
a number we shouM

LTC Almanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0143

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

caB in to, or if you'll initiate the

02919150

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Monday, December 12.2011 2:51 PM
'Almanza. Paul'; 'coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com'
Matthew kemkes; '(b) (6)
'; Morrow 111, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard. Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA;
(b) (6)
l'; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
RE: Telephonic 802

Subject:
Sir,

We are setting up right now and w i l l initiate the three way conversation. I f
Mr. Coombs could have MAJ l^emkes called up on his side, then we can ensure a l l
are on the call.
v/r

29506

^BB

CPTFein

^'m.

Undassified Email Artide 32 0144

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02216072

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29507

Ce:

coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com
Monday, December 12, 2011 2:56 PM
>;
Fein. Ashdwi CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Matthew kemkes ;
Morrow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
(b) (6)
; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA

Subject:

(b (b) (6)
)RE: Tdephonic
(6
)

From:
Sent:
To:

802

Ashdai,
I will be the only member from the defense team on the call. You can reach me at my 401-744-3007 number.
BesL
David
David E. Cocmibs, Esq.
Law Office of David E Coombs
II South Angd I SfreeL #317
Providence, Rl 02906
Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156

Locd: (508) 689-4616
Fax: (508) 689-9282

G!X)inbj#Mmywww.armywurtm
***Confidentidity Notice: Thisfransmission,including attachments, may contain confidentid attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use ofthis information may be
unlawfiil and is prohibited.***

Unclassified Email Artide 32 0145

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02216070

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29508

coorabs@arraycourtmartialdefensecora
Monday,Deceraber 12, 2011 5:44PM
Alraanza,Paulv>;Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW
SJA>
Matthew kerakes Mon^ow IILJoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, AngelM CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
il>;
melissassantiago@us.array.rati
RE:Telephonic802

LTC Alraanza,
28USC 1746 Stateraents
In response to your request forus to look at 2010WL 2265833 and 2002 WL243445,the delense's position is
that both cases are inapplicable to fhe situation at hand In/^/.^^^, the lOfound that TRD was unavailable and
that her videotaped sfateraent was swom Suchadeferraination was appropriate given the fact TRD responded
to questions indicating that she knew the difference between fhe tmth andalie and proraised to teti the tmth
As the 10 and the AFCCA conecfly concluded, this colloquyraorethan adequately satisfied fhe
oath/affirraation requireraent so as toraakeTRD'svideotaped stateraentasworn sfateraent underRCM 405(g)
(4)(B)(i) In the instant case, unswom stateraents under 2 8 U S C ^ 1746 do not share any of fhe sarae
hallraarks ofaswom stateraenL The stateraents are notraadein front of anyone and the stateraents are not
sirailar, in that they are notraadeinfirontofaperson authorized to adrainister oaths
Likewise, .^/^^v/^^ dealt withavideotaped interview that was done wifhoutaforraal swearing or oath
However,rtqualifted asaswom sfateraent in accordance withRCM 405(g)(4)(B)(i) since onalater date the
unavailable witness did swearto the tmth ofthe stateraents contained therein The 10 correctly found this to be
aswomadoptionofthevideofapedinterviewsthaLpursuantfo(^/^^^^/^/^.^v II^i:^^,36MJ 651(ACMR
1992), rendered it adraissible None of the individuals who provided the unsworn stateraents under 2 8 U S C ^
1746 have subsequently providedaswom adoption of their unswom sfateraent in accordance wifhRC.M.405
(g)(4)(B)(i)
An unswom sfateraent provided under 28USC.^ 1746 does not qualify asaswom StateraenL In orderfor an
unswomstaferaentprovidedunder28USC^ 1746tobeadraissible,rtraustbesubscribedandsigned"ina
iudicial proceeding or course ofjustice" at the Artide 32 hearing Aplain reading of28USCSecfion1746
andRCM 405(h)(l)(A) undercuts any arguraent tothe contrary
Closure
While the Defense acknowledges the general right ofthe public to attend crirainal proceedings, suchrightis not
unfettered andraustbe balanced by the right of fhe accused toafairtrial Speciftcally,the Defense raainfains
that the public's interest in five discrete pieces of evidence,whichraayorraaynot be adraissible if the case
proceeds to triaL is not sufficientiyoverwhelraingfo override the accused'srighttoafair trial Itisiraportantto
note that dl ofthe cases in this area involve fhe govemraent atteraptin^ to close the Article 32 hearing while the
accused was attempting to assert fhe right toapublic hearing Here, ifisthe accused who is asserting his right
to dose parts of the hearing in orderto preserve the integrity of the judicial process and to ensure hisrighttoa
lairtriaL The Govemraent can point to no harra to its case based upon fhe defense's requesL Instead, the
discussion seeras to be centered on subsequent steps thatarailifary judge can fake to cure any error at the
Article 32. This analysis israisguidedgiven the relative ease ofavoiding fhe harra and fhe liraited nature ofthe
defense'srequesL Certainly,fo fhe extent that we are going to err, we should err on fhe side of caution. Inthis
instance, that wouldraeandosing the hearing during those limited times requested by fhe defense
AITTraining

^^^^^^^^^^^,,^^^320,^

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29509

02216070

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY
The defense has attached the referenced emdl regarding the IT trdning.
BesL
David
DavidE Coorabs, Esq
Law Office ofDavid E.Coorabs
IlSouthAngeti SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TotiFree:1 800 588 4156
LocaL (508)689 4616
Fax:(508)689 9282
^OiOI^bs@ainnyc^^^
yywwarraycourtraartialdefensecora
***ConfidentialityNotice:Thisfransraission, including attachraenfs, raay contain confidential attomey-client
information and is intended forthe person(s)or corapany naraed Ifyou are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete ati copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying oruse ofthis inforraation may be
unlawfiil and is prohibited ***

UndassifiedEmailArtic1e 32 0146

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219348

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29510

From:
Sent:
To:

Almanza,PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC (b) (6)
Monday,Deceraber 12, 2011 9:00PM
MorrowIILJoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
>; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW
SJA coorabs@arraycourtraartialdefensecora; Overgaard, AngelM CPT USA JEHQNCR/MDW SJA il>; Matthew kerakes
(b) (6)
; Whyte, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>

Ce:
Subject:
Attach:

(b) (6)

USvPFCBM WifnessList(UNCLASSIFIED)
Manning Article 32 Witness List 121211rev doc

Classification; UNCLASSIFIED
CounselAttached permy conversation with CPTFein andMr.Coombsthisaftemoonisacopy of mywitnesstistforthe hearing.
Iwill ciredateasigned version of this document as soonas possible.
Thankyou.
LTC Ahnanza
ClassificationUNCLASSIFIED

Undassified Email Article 32 0147

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02919147

Fr^:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29511

Fein.Ashden CPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Monday,Oecember12.2011 9:01PM
coombs@armycourtmartia1defense com; Almanza, Paul
Matthew kemkes; (b) (6)
Morrow IIL JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MOW SJA; Overgaard, AngdMCPT USAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA;
(b) (6)
Whyte, Jeffrey H.CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
RE: Telephonic 802

Sir,

TheUnited States maintains i t s previously stated positionon both the validity of the sworn
statements and keeping thehearingopen to thepublic i n o r d e r t o reducepublic scrutiny and
ensure transparency ofthe military justice process.
Our systems were down tonight, and wewill send a copy ofthe email the defense referenced
tomorrow.
v/r
CPTFein

Unclassified Email Article 32 0148

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219346

From:

Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29512

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Monday, December 12, 2011 9:15 PM
Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
;
Morrow IU, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
(b) (6)
; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>
Re: Telephonic 802

AUI just sent the witness list I meidoned in my conversation witii Mr Coombs and CPT Fein from my ako account
((b) (6)
) As I liavcn"! yetreceivedit on my DOJ email to which I sent it as a cc. JDBI wanted to let you know itis
onitsway.
Also, counseL I intend to ask nn lepl advisor for advice on whether a statenKnt under penally of perjury shoukl be considered a
"swom statemeni"tiiatcan be considered bytiie10 over defense (Ejection if the witiKSs is notreasonablyavailable.
Thank you.
LTC Ahnanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0149

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02919143

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29513

Feih.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ^NCR/MOWSJA
Monday,Oecember12,2011 9:21PM
Almanza,Pad; coombs@armycourtmartialdetense.com; Almanza.PaulRLTC RES USAR
USARC
Matthew kemkes; p(b) (6)
Monow IIL JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MOW SJA; Overgaanl, AngdMCPTUSAJFHQ^NCR/MDWSJA;
(b) (6)
Whyte, JeffreyH CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
RE:Te1ephonic802

Sir,

The United States received your email,
v/r
CPTFein

Unclassified Email Article 3^ 0150

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216066

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29514

coombs@armycourtmartialdefensecom
Monday,December 12, 2011 9:42PM
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>; Fein, AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW
SJA>
(b)
(6)
Matthew kemkes
MortowIILJoDean, CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, AngelMCPT USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
(b (b) (6)
L Whyfe, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
) (b) (6)
(b
)(6
RETelephonic802
)
(6)

LTC Almanza,
The delense received your list ofintended witnesses It is the defense's understanding that the listed witnesses
are those that you would wantto hearfrora during the hearing Ifaspecific witness is listed as reasonably
available by you, then this wimess is to be produced asalive witnesses The defense is unsureofyourintent
regardingawimess that is on your list but is listed as "not reasonably available" It appears that you are
deferring to fhe govemment regarding whether these wimesses witi be produced and in whatmanner. Tbe
delense believes that this determination must be made by yt^ and not the govemmenL
If the defense's reading of yourmemorandum is corred, it appears that only I2wimesses will becdled at the
Article 32(one of which witi invoke his 5th Amendment Right) The remaining witnesses, underthe above
understanding, witi testify ifat ati, at the govemment's discretion
With regards to the wimesses not listed by you, the defense requestsamling regarding whether these y^tnesses
have been deemed as either not rdevanL cumulative or not reasonably available UnderRCM 405(g)(2)(D),
the defense objects to fhe determination that its listed y^tnesses are either not relevanL cumulative ornot
reasonably available
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs,Esq
Law Office ofDavidECoombs
llSouth Angdl SfreeL #317
Providence, R1 02906
TotiFree:1 800 588^I56
LocaL (508)689^16
Fax:(508)689 9282

i^^i^^bs^^y^ourtra^rti^ld^^^

yywwarmycourtraartiddefensecora
***ConfidentidityNofice:Thisfransraission, including attachments, may contdn confidentid attomey-client
information and is intended forthe person(s)or company named If you are not theintended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete all copies Unauthorized disdosure, copying or use ofthis information may be
unlawfiil and is prohibited ***

.. . . . .

^^^^^^

Unclassified Email Artic1e 32 0151

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02919137

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sir,

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29515

Fein.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Monday, Oecember12, 2011 10:51PM
coombs@annycourtmartialdefense.com; Almanza, Pad; Almanza. PaulRLTC RES USAR
USARC
Matthew kemkes; (b) (6)
Morrow IIL JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MOW SJA;Overgaani,AngdMCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA;
(b) (6)
Whyte, JeffreyH.CPTUSA JFHQ-NCF^OW SJA(
RE; Telephonic 802
b
SFCAdkinsART-31 pdf
)
(
6
)

As for those witnesses you determined to be reasonably available, theUnited States agrees
withthe defense's interpretation.
Based onthe attached memorandum, SFC Adkins is invoking his Article 31 rights. The United
States w i l l producehim i f y o u determine his presence is required to invoke his rights.
Otherwise, a l l the government's offered witnesses are available and the United States w i l l
check on the status of CPT keay and SGTPadgett (defense offered witnesses) tomorrowmorning.
OTS should not be an issue, i f t h e y are available.
As for anywitness designated as not reasonably available, the govemment requests to call
them as telephonic witnesses, i f you are not considering their sworn statements.
The United States joins the defense in the request for you to annotate f o r t h e record which
witnesses you deemed not relevant or relevant but cumulative.
Finally, as we discussed earlier today duringour conference call, the United States stands
ready to coordinate the trayel for those witnesses that are reasonably available or
alternativetestimonyof each witness thatyou deem relevant andnot cumulative, fromboth
the government's and defense's witness l i s t s .
Thank you.
v/r
CPT Fein

Undassified Email Artide 32 0152

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216060

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29516

coombs@armycourtmartiddefense.com
Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:38 AM
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>; Almanza, Paul R LTC RES USAR USARC
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
;
Morrow III, JoDean, CPT USA JEHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
1>; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA >;
(b) (6)
; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW
(b)
(6)
SJA
RE: Tdephonic 802

LTC Almanza,
The defense requests that SFC Adkins be produced at the Article 32 hearing. The basis that SFC Adkins is
attempting to avoid testifying is not a proper invocation ofhis Article 31rightsor his 5th Amendment right
against self-incrimination. The Fifth Amendment protections only apply to in a custodial intenogation and
when the individual questioning is law enforcement. Article 31 applies only when the military questioner is
acting or could reasonably be considered as acting in an official law enforcement or disciplinary capacity.
United States v. Bell, 44 M.J. 403 (C.A.AF. 1996) (Article 31 requirement for wamings does not apply at trial
or Article 32 investigation) SFC Adkins is attempfing to invoke his Article 31rightsin a noncriminal matter
(administrative reduction) and when he is not the subject of any questioning designed to elicit incriminating
statements. He should therefore be ordered to testify.
bl the altemative, die defense requests that the govemment provide a grant of testimonial immunity to SFC
Adkins under R.C.M. 704(e). SFC Adkins is a material witness at the Article 32 hearing. The fact that he is
^pealing his reduction in rank should not provide him with the ability to avoid testifying.
BesL
David
David E. Coombs, Esq.
Law Office ofDavid E. Coombs
11 South Angell Sfreet, #317
Providence, RI 02906
Toll Free; 1-800-588-4156
Local: (508)689-4616
Fax; (508) 689-9282
coombs@annvcourtmartiddefcnse.com

wmutTmy.QQiirMMM'Mms&.^m
***Confidentiality Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain confidentid attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is prohibited ***

.. , . . .

oon..,

Unclassified Email Artide 32 0153

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219342

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29517

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:56 A M
Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JEHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
coombs@armycourtmarttaldefense.(b) (6)
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
Mon-ow III, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
; Overgaard. Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
(b) (6)
; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>
Re: Tdephonic 802

CounselYes. I intend that witnesses I listed as "rcason^ly available" be pnoduced as live witnesses at the bearing, and witnesses I listed as
"not rc^nably available" be Iteaiti fromtiiiroughan alternative to testimony
My makii^ initial determinations as to availabititv" of witnesses does not constitute my defemng to the gov ernment on whether
witnesses will be produced or not. Rather. 1 sitrq;^ made an initial determinalkm as to whether witnesses werereasonablyavailable
or not per RCM 405(g)(2)(A) and (B).
I then asked the ^vcmmcnl ifthey bcUcved am witness was not reasonably available to see if there arc am issues with immediate
commanders of militaiy witnesses determining that they are not reasonably av ailable or civilian witnesses not being reason^ly
available.
|
I then asked the govemment whether witnesses I initiaUy detennined are notreasonablyav aiWle will be av aiWile for telephonic
tesunionv or whetlKrtiieybelieve another alternative lo testimony is appropriate in order lo determine whether there would be any
issue witii telephonic testimony ofthe wimesses I have initidly determined are notreasonablyavailable.
As counsel know, there is aill an outstanding issue as to w heflier statements under penalty of perjuiy of certain witnesses onrayUst
designated as notreason^kav ailable can be considered over defeise objection. For other witnesses on my list that 1 initialh
determined arc nolreasonablyavailable. 1 intend to taketiieirtestimony telephonically.
I wiU of course note the defense objection and prepare a written detemiination to whether 1 deemed v^itnesses nottistedas t»t
relevant, cunulative. or notreasonablyavailable.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
LTC Ahnanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0154

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219335

From:
Sent:
To:

Ce:
Subject:
Attach:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29518

Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC (b) (6)
Tuesday,Deceraber 13,2011 12:18PM
Mon^ow IB, JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
^ Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW
SJAoorabs@annycourtraartialdefense.cora;
(b) (6)
Overgaard, AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
; Matthew kerakes
Whyte, JeflreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
-(b) (6)
(b) (6)
; Holzer, MarkLTC MIL USA
OTJAGU S v P F C B M ClosureDetennination(UNCLASSIFIED)
Manning Article 32 Closure Deterraination 121311doc; Manning Artide 32 Witness
Lisf12131Idoc

ClassificationUNCLASSIFIED
CounselAttached is my closure determination. I've also attached another copy of my witness list-linadvertentiy had the wrong office symbol
on whatlprovided yesterday.
OnceIgel1hesedocumenlsprin1ed.Iwtil provide signed copies.
LTC Almanza
Classification; UNCLASSIFIED

Undassified Email Artide 32 0155

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216057

From:

Sent:
To:

Ce:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29519

coombs@armycourtmartialdefensecom
Tuesday,December 13,2011 421 PM
Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC>; Morrow BI,
JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>;
Fein, AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
il>;
p(b) (6)
l; Overgaard, AngelMCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Matthewkemkes
(b) (6)
; Whyte, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>
(b)
(6)
p
; Holzer, MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)

Subject:

REUSvPEC BMCIosureDetennination (UNCLASSIFIED)

LTC Almanza,
The defense does not agree with your andysis underRCM 806(b)(2) Tbe altematives to closure that you
considered are not, in fact, reasonable in this case Thiscase has already been subjected to extensive media
scmtiny and PFC Manning has dready been adjudged guilty in the court ofpublic opinion Moreover, several
high-ranking officials (both military andgovemment)have made improper comments conceming PFC
Manning's probableguilt and appropriate punishmenL Inacase such asthis,thereisno substitute Ibr ensuring
that potentially inadmissible and highly infiammatory evidence is not placed into the public realm.
The deli^serespectfully requests that you reconsideryour mling In the event that you decline to do so, the
defi^nsealtematively requests that ati media be barred Irom the proceedings in theftveinstances refi^renced in
the defense's motion Any non-media individud would be permitted to remain in the courfroom Underthe
discussion to R.CM 806(b)(2), fhis is nota^dosure" and therefore would not have to meet the elements
outlined in the closure mies Should you exclude media pursuant to this requesL the defensefiirtherrequests
that you issueagag order barring the individuals remaining in the courfroom from discussing the testimony
elicited
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs, Esq
Law Office ofDavidE Coombs
IISouthAngell SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
^
TollFree:l800-588-4156
^
Locd:(508)689^616
Fax:(508)6899282
^
coombs@armycourtmartialdefensecom
www.armycourttnartiddefensecom
^^,1^

Confidentiality Notice This transmission, including attachments, may contain confidentid attomey-client
inlbrmation and is intendedfi3rtheperson(s)orcompany named Ifyou arenottheintended recipiem, please
notify the sender and ddete ati copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying oruse ofthis information may be
unlawlul and is prohibited.***

Undassified Email Arfide 32 0156

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216052

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29520

coombs@armycourtmartiddefensecom
Tuesday,December 13.2011645 PM
Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
I>;
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC
Matthew kemkes Mon^owIILJoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, AngelM CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA ;
(b) (6)
Whyte, JeftreyHCPTUSAJEHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>
RETdephonic802

CPTFein,
Can you provide me withalist of those witnesses that the govemment is producing in person, and those that the
govemment will make available by telephone'^
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs. Esq
Law Office ofDavidE Coombs
IISouthAngell SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TollFree:1 800 588^156
Local: (508)689-4616
Fax:(508)689 9282
^^.rtlb^@^.rtiiyei^rt^^
wvyyy.armycqurtmart^^
***Confidentia1ity Notice Thisfransmission,induding attachments, may contain confidential attomey-client
information and is intended forthe person(s)or company named Ifyou are not the intended recipienL please
notily fhe sender and delete ati copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use ofthis information may be
unlawlul and is prohibited ***

Undassified Email Artide 32 0157

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216051

From:

Sent:
To:

Ce:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29521

coorabs@arraycourtraartialdefense.cora
Tuesday,Deceraber 13,2011 7:07PM
Alraanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR US/^C

; Morrow OL
JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>;
Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA l>;
(b) (6)
Overgaard, AngdMCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; Matthew kerakes
(b) (6)
>; Whyte, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
Holzer, MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)

Subject:

RulingsonDefenseMotions

LTC Alraanza,
The defense requests that you issueamling on the following defense motions prior to the date of the Artide 32:
1) The delense request for production of evidence;
2) The defense objections to the govemraenf's requested evidence;
3) Those witnesses that are being produced in person, and those that are being produced by telephone;
4) The basis for the denial ofthe defense requested witnesses;
5) The delense request for reconsideration ofthe closureraotion;and
6) The delense request for exclusion ofraediaandagag order.
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs, Esq.
^
Law Office ofDavid E.Coombs
IISouthAngell SfreeL #317
Providence, Rl 02906
TotiFree:1 800 588 4156
LocaL (508)689 4616
Fax:(508)689 9282
coorabs@arraycourfraartialdefense.cora
wwwarraycourtraartialdefensecora

***ConfidentialityNotice:Thisfransraission, including attachraenfs, may contain confidential attomey-client
information and is intended forthe person(s)or corapany naraed Ifyou are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete ati copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying oruse ofthis information may be
unlawfiil and is prohibited ***

Undassified Entail Article 32 0158

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216046

From:
Sent:
To:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29522

Cc:

coombs@armycourtmartiddefense.com
Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:30 PM
Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
y>; Almanza, Paul R LTC RES USAR USARC
>
(b)
(6)
Matthew kemkes
;
Morrow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, Angel M CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
(b) (6)
; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>

Subject:

RE: Tdephonic 802

LTC Almanza,
The defense would also request that you issue a mling on its request to order SFC Adkins to testify at the
Article 32 hearing given the fact that his basis for refusing to do so deals with an administrative matter The
defense also requests that the govemment indicate whether it has taken any steps to issue a grant of immunity to
SFC Adkins, and if noL why not.
BesL
David
David E. Coombs, Esq.
Law Office of David E. Coombs
11 South Angdl SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
Toll Free; 1-800-588-4156
Local: (508)689-4616

Fax: (508) 689-9282

Gaianbs@amiyGoui^
www.armvcourtraartia1defense.com
•••Confidentiality Notice: Thisfransmission,including attachments, may contain confidential attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named If you are not the intended redpient, please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlawful and is prohibited.***

,. , . . .
Unclassified Email Artide 32 0159

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219330

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29523

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
v>
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:08 AM
coombs@armycourtmarttddefense.com; (b) (6)
Mmhew kemkes (b) (6)
;
Mon-ow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQi(b) (6)
NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
(b) (6)
il; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW
SJA (b) (b) (6)
l>; Holzer, Marie LTC MIL USA OTJAG
Re; Tdephonic 802

Counsel This provides notice tiiat I intend lo ask my legal advisor whether SFC Ad kin shoukl be produced at the hearing in light of
his memorandum indicating that he intends to invoke his Artide 31 and 5th Amendment rights and, if so, whether he may
be ordered to testify given that the matter cited in his memorandum is an administrative one.
Thank you.
LTC Almanza

Undassified Email Article 32 0160

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02919131

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:
Sir,

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29524

Fein.Ashden CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Wednesday.December 14,2011 10:00 AM
Almanza, Pad; coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com; (b) (6)
l
Matthew kemkes;(b) (6)
Monow IIL JoOean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Overgaard, AngdMCPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA;
(b) (6)
( iL^hyte, Jeffrey H.CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA;
Holzer.Mart^LTC MIL USA OTJAG
b
RE;Te1epht^ic802
)
(
6
)

Good morning. The United States has additional comments; however our email server has been
down since 1947 hours last night and is now only sporadically available. We are working to
get our response and an update in the next fewminutes.
v/r
CPTFein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA
Chief, Military Justice
MilitaryDistrict ofWashington (MOW)
(b) (6)

Undassified Email Article 32 0161

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02919120

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:
Importance:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29525

Fein.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
Wednesday,0ecember14,2011 10:37 AM
Almanza, PauLcoombs@armycourtmartia1defense.com;(b) (6)
Matthew kemkes; (b) (6)
Monow IIL JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MOW SJA; Overgaard,AngelMCPT USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA;
L Whyfe, JeffreyH CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA;(
(b) (6)
Ho1zer,Mari^LTC MIL USA OTJAG
b
RE:Telephonic802
)
Fw; Swom Sfafemenf (UNCLASSIFIED)
High

(
6
)

Sir,
Good morning. The government was without email from at least 1937 last night u n t i l 1030 t h i s
morning. This email serves as an update to your witness request and other administrative
issues up t o 1937 last night. Email i s sporadic but we should be able to continue
communicating through email.
Witness List. The government i s working t o finalize whether witnesses w i l l be available for
telephonic testimony. We do not anticipate any issues with telephonic testimony of the
witnesses you ruled "not available" except the below witnesses.
1. We do not know whether the different original classification authorities (OCAs) w i l l be
available for telephonic testimony and w i l l l i k e l y not know u n t i l 1300 on 15 Oec 11.
2. The United States requests CPT keay be deemed not reasonably available and t e s t i f y via
telephone. CPT keay i s currently scheduled for block leave during the hearing and already
has a i r l i n e tickets and other non refundable reservations. We are working t o obtain copies
of his leave form and other travel documents.
3. The United States requests SGT Padgett be deemed not reasonably available and t e s t i f y via
telephone. SGT Padgett just returned from a f i v e month TOV for MOS re classification
training (AIT). He just returned to the unit and we expect more information from the command
in the next few hours. I w i l l forward the commander's decision about his physical presence
and reason, once we receive i t .
4. The United states requests Mr. Adrian Lamo's be deemed reasonably available. Mr. Lamo i s
diagnosed with asperger syndrome. This i s a high functioning form of autism. Based on his
medical condition, he w i l l not l i k e l y be able to relay meaningful testimony over the
telephone that should assist you in your investigation, and allow the prosecution and defense
to adequately question him. Additionally, the witness would l i k e l y be non responsive i f
t e s t i f y i n g over the telephone. Rather than rule him reasonably unavailable but available f o r
telephonic testimony, the United States requests the a b i l i t y to produce him for in-person
testimony, i f he i s w i l l i n g t o participate i n the hearing.
5. The United States requests SFC Adkins be deemed not reasonably available based on the
previously provided memorandum stating he intends to invoke his rights under Article 31. "A
witness who i s unavailable under Mil. R. Evid. 804(a)(1) (6), i s not 'reasonably available.'"
RCM405(g)(l)(A). MRE 804(a)(1) incorporates i n the claimof privilege against self
incrimination.
6. WOl Balonek i s not available for telephonic testimony based on the attached email stating
he intends to invoke his rights under Article 31. "Awitness who i s unavailable under Mil.
R. Evid. 804(a)(1) (6), i s not 'reasonably available.'" RCM 405(g)(1)(A). MRE 804(a)(1)
incorporates i n the claim of privilege against self incrimination.
7. As of three months ago. Inmate Whitfield was a represented party and the United States i s
working t o contact his c i v i l i a n defense counsel to f i r s t determine whether he i s s t i l l a
represented party, and then t o request Inmate Whitfield's cooperation with your order. The
confinement f a c i l i t y i s prepared to provide him access to a telephone f o r testimony.

Undassified Email Article 32 0162

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02919120

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY
v/r
CPTFein

2

Undassified Email Artide 32 0162

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29526

02216038

From:

Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29527

coombs@armycourtmartialdefi^nsecom
Wednesday.December 14,2011 1235 PM
Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
MorrowIILJoDean, CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; Overgaard, AngelM CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Whyte, JeffireyHCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>;Ho1zer,MarkLTCMIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
>; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
>
RETe1ephonic802

LTC Almanza,
The defense objects to having the listed OCA witnesses testily by telephone The deli^se'sability to question
these witnesses will be fmstrated by not havingthem in person The defi^nse intends todiscuss dassified
inforraation with each wimess In orderto adequately do so, fhe defense will need to hand classifted
inforraation each individud wimess. As such, having the wimess testily by telephone witi not ensurea
thorough and impartid Article 32 hearing.
Additionally,the defense objects to each of the govemment's requests below conceming CPT Keay,SGT
PadgetL SFC Adkins,W01 Balonek, and Inmate Whitfield The govemment has had more than enough time
to ensure these wimesses were available to testify Thefi^ctthataparticularwitnesshas made dtemattve plans
should not be held against the delense given ourtimely request fiirthe wimess
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs, Esq
Law Office ofDavidECoombs
llSoutii Angell SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TotiFree:1 800 588^156
LocaL (508)689^616
Fax; (508)689 9282
coombs@armycourtmartiddef^nsec^qm
^^^^^^^i^y^i^ll^^T^^^^o^^^^
1
***Confidentiality Notice Thisfransmission,induding attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client
information and is intended forthe person(s)or company named Ifyou are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete all copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying oruse ofthis infbrmation may be
unlayyfid and is prohibited ***

Unclassified Email Artide 32 0163

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219321

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29528

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>
Wednesday,December 14, 2011 1:03 PM
coombs@annycourtmartiddefensecom(b) (6)
i
MatthewkemkesMorrowIILJoDean, CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW SJA
>; Overgaard, AngelMCPT USA JEHQNCR/MDW SJA ,
(b) (6)
LWhyfe,JeffireyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
1>; Holzer, MarkLTCMIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
;Fein,AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
>
Re: Telephonic 802

CounselWoukl you be availat^eforafelephoneconferenceaf1500foday7 I'dlikefodiscusstheissuesconceming witness
ava^bility mentioned tielow.
lamwori^ing on the ofheroufstanding items.
LTC Almanza

Undassified Email Artide 32 0164

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02919111

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

Subject:
S i r . No issues.

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29529

Fein.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ^NCR/MDWSJA
Wednesday, December 14.2011 1:27 PM
(b) (6)
v';'coombs@armycourtmartia1defense.com';
'(b) (6)
Matthew kemkes;'(b) (6)
; Monow IIL JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ(b) (6)
NCR/MDWSJA;'(b) (6)
(b) (6)
1'; Whyfe, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA;(
HolzerMart^LTC MIL USA OTJAG
b
Re:Te1ephonic802
)
(
6
)

Undassified^Email Artide 32 0165

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02216029

From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29530

coombs@annycourtmartiddefense.com
Wednesday.December 14, 2011 1 39 PM
Almanza,(b) (6)
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
;
Mon^owIB,JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>;Overgaard,AngdMCPTUSAJEHQ^
NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>,
(b) (6)
Whyte, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Holzer, MarkLTCMIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
>;Fein,.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)

Subject:

RETdephonic802

LTC Almanza,
Iwiti be available on my ceti at 1500
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs, Esq
Law Office ofDavidE Coombs
IISouthAngell SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TotiFree:1 800^588^156
Local: (508)689^16
Fax:(508)6899282
:^l^^1Tibs@annycou^^^
www.armycourtmartiddefense.com
***Confidentia1ityNotice:Thisfransmission,induding attachments, may contain confidential attomey-client
information and is intended forthe person(s)or company named Ifyou are not the intended recipienL please
notily the sender and delete all copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying oruse ofthis infbrmation may be
unlawfiil and is prohibited ***

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY
UnclassifiedEmail Article 32 0166

02219311

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29531

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
v>
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:34 PM
coombs@armycourtmartiaIdefense.com; (b) (6)
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
Morrow IH, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
(b) (6)
Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
>
Re: Telephonic 802

CPT Fein I'll be available at(b) (6)
Thanks.

LTC Almanza

Unclassified Email Artide 32 0167

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02919099

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29532

Fein,Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
Wednesday,Oecember14,2011 2:36 PM
coombs@armycourtmartialdefense com; Almanza, PauL (b) (6)
Matthew kemkes; (b) (6)
Morrow IIL JoOean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Oyergaard,AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/M0WSJA;
(b) (6)
iL)^hyfe,Jeffrey H.CPT USA JFHQNCF^MOW SJA;
Holzer.Mart^LTC MIL USA OTJAG
RE:Te1ephonic802

Sir,
1500 works for the prosecution. I w i l l i n i t i a t e the phone c a l l .
responses and other comments of on-going issues:

Below are the government's

Excluding the Press. Sessions should only be closed as a last resort. The press i s part of
the public, and wholesale exclusion of the press i s too broad. Again, the purpose of an open
hearing i s to subject the Article 32 to public scrutiny to ultimately enhance the public^s
confidence i n our system. As the defense points out, this case already has media scrutiny
and closing the hearing to the media w i l l not achieve the purpose of the open hearing. This
issue was contemplated by ACCA i n i t s decision i n Denver Post.
OCA Witnesses. The proposed testimony about alleged damage assessments i s not relevant, and
the United States does not approval to turn over or use any damage assessments, i f they
exists. Therefore, any proffered testimony by the defense w i l l not be authorized to be
discussed. This i s hypothetical testimony based on documents that may or may not exist. The
United States can affirm that some of the documents do exists and others do not. The United
States i s working on whether i t has the authority to disclose the existence o f t h e documents
to the defense, as requested by the investigating officer. Telephonic testimony, i f
available, should suffice for the defense, prosecution, and investigating officer to have the
opportunity t o questions the declarants of a l l the sworn statements, for a l l but two of the
declarations because those two are classified. I f an OGA^s OCA i s available for telephonic
testimony, then the United States w i l l have a secure phone with speakerphone capability
available for the defense, prosecution, and investigating officer to ask questions based on
those declarations.
SGT Padgett and CPT l^eay. At t h i s point, we have been informed by the brigade judge advocate
that both Soldiers w i l l l i k e l y be deemed not reasonably available. We are working t h i s
procedure and w i l l provide any documentation, i f this does occur.
Government's Time. The United States i s working diligently to obtain the a v a i l a b i l i t y of a l l
witnesses you selected to provide testimony. The reason that CPT keay, SGT Padgett, and
Inmate Whitfield^s a v a i l a b i l i t y i s taking longer than a l l the others i s because none of the
witnesses were aware that the defense was asking for their participation i n this A r t i c l e 32.
The f i r s t time any of them or their chains of command became aware, was after you published
your l i s t . The United States does not prospectively notify individuals that they might be
called as defense witnesses, rather the United States coordinates travel and a v a i l a b i l i t y
once the investigating officer makes a determination, and there are no administrative issues
for their production.
The United States joins the defense i n asking for your determination ofwhat evidence you
w i l l consider, so that the prosecution and defense w i l l have time to ask f o r y o u r
reconsideration, i f needed.
For administrative issues, the defense joins the United States i n asking for you to pre
determine the format of the hearing. We offer that for taking testimony, the format be
1

^^^^^^^^,,D^^3^D^

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02919099

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29533

similar t o t r i a l - direct, cross, re-direct, re-cross, and 10 questions. Additionally that
there should be closingargument. TheUnitedStates alsoasks f o r t h e a b i l i t y toconduct a
very limited openingstatement that is limited to providing you a roadmapof the testimony
andthe key pieces ofevidence youwill be reviewing. The defense does not join the United
States in this request.
v/r
CPTFein

Unclassified_Email Artide 32 0168

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219253

29534

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

From:

Almanza,PaulRLTCRES USAR USARC
Sent:

Wednesday,Deceraber 14, 20112:19PM

To:

Alraanza, Paul (b) (6)
;coorabs@arraycourtraartialdefense cora;
Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA >
(b) (6)
L Overgaard, AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
>; Matthew kerakes (b) (6)
>;
Whyfe, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
il>; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW
SJA ; Monow III, JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MDW SJA >;
(b) (6)
i
Deterrainations andEvidence List (UNCLASSIFIED)

Ce:

Subject:
Attach:

l>

28 USCI746 Legislative Historyrtf;USvGunderraan(67MJ683)rtf;NisshoIwaiv
Kline(845 F2dl300)rtf;HartvHairston(343 F3d762)2003rtf;ManningArtide32
Def Objfo Gov Evid Deterrainl21411doc; Manning Artide 32 Evidence List
121411doc

ClassificationUNCLASSIFIED
CounselThree issues, listed below. And in addition to aUaching the documentsreferencedin L,below,Iam also attaching my determinations
regarding defense objections to govemment evidence and my evidence tisL
L Statements underpenaltyof peijury. Ireceived legd advice frommy legal advisoryesterday concemingwhetherastalement
tmderpenalty of periniyconstitutesa-swom statement perntitting it to be considered over defense objection if the witness is n
reasonably available. The advice was that inaccordance with the text of2^Ll.S.C.Sectionl74^,adeclara1ion underpenalty of
peijutyislegatiy given'likeforeeandeffecfofaswomslalemenlandforpurposesofconsiderationasanallernativetoleslti^^
the Article :^2 may be considered asaswom StatemenL LTC Holzer also advised that the discussion to Aniclel^lfsee para. 57c(3))
mentions signingasummarized transcript of Article ^2 testimony underpenalty of perjury, which indical^^
signed outside of an Article ^2 hearing but associated with suchan investigation can be considered. lalso note that the classification
review statements at issue all indicate that they are
inthe course ofjustice'as they all indcate the persons making the slalemenls knew Ihey were beingpreparedforuse in litis case^
As such,1consider1hese statements to have the same indicia ofreliabilityas swom statements
Basedonhisadyiceandmyreviewoftheindiciaofrehabiti1y,Iin1endtoconsidertiiestatemenlsmadeunderpenalfyofpei^^
provided by RADM KevinDonegan, Mr. RobenBetz.LtCen Robert Schmidle.VADMRobertHanvard, Mr. Patrick Kennedy,
RADMDayid^oods.andtiiepersonsubsenbingBatesnumbers00^7^I4^^tl^7^I75and004I0^2^^04I0^^4
LTC Holzerprovided fourdocuments. attached, supporting his advice;
a Thelegislativehistoiyof2^USC Sectionl74^
bUSvCundemian,^7ML^^:^(ACCA 200^)
cNissholwaivKline.^45F2dl^00(5thCirl^^^)
dHartyHairs1on,;^43FB^d7^2(5tiiCir 200:^)
2. Request forreconsideration of closure delermination/requesl formediaexclusionandgag order. Irecognize that the defense
disagrees withmy determination thatreasonablealtematives to closure, such as thorough voirdire of the panel members and
appropriate rdings and instmctions by the tmtitaryjudge. would ensure that should this case bereferredto trid, PFC Manningwodd
receiveafairtrid. However.ldo not believe that the defense has shown why these alternatives to closure are insufficient
Addtionally,withrespect totitedefense'sreference to high-r^nldng officials ..havlingl made improper coinmentscon^^
Marining'sprobable gdltandappropriate punishment,' inMr.Coombss 1^1^21December2011emaiLlfind that thorough voirdire
and appropriate mlings and instmdions by the military judge will adequately address theriskofunlawfd command infiuence. I
tiiereforedenythedefensesrequestforreconsiderationofmyclos
ure determination, ^ithrespect to the defense'srequest to exclude the mediafrom discussion of the five topicsat issue and to issuea
gag orderpreventingotherwilnesses from discussing those topics, thoserequestsare denied
3. Invocation of Article^I/Fifth Amendmentrights.Therecommendationlreceivedfrommylegd advisorwas that once witnesses
invoke their Article^lorFitthAmendmentrights, those witnessesarenotreasonably available. LTC Holzeralsorecommendedtiiat

^^^,^^^^^^^^D^^3^D^

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219253

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29535

counsel forthe vvitnessesbeconlacied todetermine whetiiertiiereareanyareasofinquiiythatthe witness could resp^
questioningwithout invoking iheti^nghis Should it be the casetiiatcounsel indicatetiiereareno areas that the witnesses will discuss
vvitiioutimokingtiieirnghls,LTCHolzerrecominended that tiie vviiness be calledintieu of rdyingonawnUen statemeni of 1^
inleniioinvoketheirrighls Accordingly.lintendlocall both SFC Adkinsand^OlBalonekasnoledbekiw
Thankyou.
LTC Ahnanza

Undassified Email Article 32 0169

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02936764

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29536

Fein. AsMen CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 4:17 PM
(b) (6)
'coombs@armycourtmartiaklefense.com'
'(b) (6)
'; Holzer, Marit LTC
MIL USA OTJAG; Matthew kemkes; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA;
Monow 111, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; (b) (6)
Re: Determinations and Evklence List (UNCLASSIFIED)

Ack s i r .

L*-

Undassified Email Article 32 0170

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02940953

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29537

Fein. Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCRAADW SJA
Wednesday. Decemtier 14, 2011 9:40 PM
Almanza, Paul R LTC RES USAR USARC; Almanza, Paul
coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com; p(b) (6)
; Overgaanl, Angel M.
CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Holzer, Mart( LTC MIL USA OTJAG; Matthew kemkes;
Whyte. Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRA40W SJA; Monrow 111, JoOean. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MOW SJA; (b) (6)
CPT Keay

Sir.
The United States contacted CPT l^eay and he w i l l be available f o r in-person testimony on or
a f t e r 3 January 2912. The defense j o i n s the United States i n the request t h a t rather than
reconvene the A r t i c l e 32 hearing a f t e r t h e NewVear f o r j u s t CPT keay's in-person testimony,
t h a t CPT l^eay be deemed not reasonably a v a i l a b l e and his testimony be given t e l e p h o n i c a l l y .
v/r

CPT Fein

'i

-1^

Unclassified Email Article 32 0171

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219252

From:
Sent:
To:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Almanza, Paul Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:27 PM
Fdn, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)

Ce:

coombs@armycounmartiddefense.com; (b) (6)
l; Overgaard,
Angd M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>, Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
; Matthew kemkes >;
Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
>; Monow III, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ(b)
(6)
NCR/MDW SJA

Subject:

Re: CPT Keay

Thank vou. CPT Fein.

Undassified Email Artide 32 0172

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29538

02219243

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attach:

29539

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC(b) (6)
>
Wednesday,Deceraber 14, 2011 10:47PM
Alraanza, Paul (b) (6)
coorabs@arraycourtmartialdefensecora; Overgaard, AngelM CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (b) (6)
; Morrow IB, JoDean, CPT
(6)
USA JFHQ NCR/MDW
SJA (b) (6)
>; Matthew
kemkes (b) (6)
; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW
SJA (b) (6)
il>;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
Whyte,JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
i
Defense requested witness deterrainations, list of persond/telephone/ofherwifnesses
(UNCLASSIFIED)
Manning Article 32 Defense Requested Witnesses Determinations 1214II doc

ClassificationUNCLASSIFIED
Counsel
Attachedare my determinations as to defenserequestedwitnesses, and below isalisl of thereasonablyavdlable wilnesseslintend to
have appearpersonatiy.and forthose witnesses who are notreasonablyavailable, whetherlinlend to take their testimony by phone or
to consideranotherallemative to testimony;
a. SFC Pad Adkins (reasonably available in person)
b. SPCEricS.Baker(reasonably available in person)
c. ^ 0 1 K y l e l Balonek(not reasonably available by telephone)
d. SA Troy Be1tencourt(reasonably available in person)
e. SSC Peter Bigelow(not reasonably avatiable by telephone)
f
CPTThomas Cherepko (notreasonablyavailable by telephone)
g. SA Antonio Edwards(reasonablyavdlable^in person)
h. CPT Casey Fdton (reasonably av ailable in person)
i.
SATotuCraham(no1 reasonably available by telephone)
i.
Mr fvtarkfohnson(reasonably available in person)
k. Mr. AdrianLamo(reasonably available in person)
L CPT SteyenLim(reasonably available in person)
m. SOT Chad Madaras(notreasonablyavailable by telephone)
n. SFC(R)BrianMadrid (notreasonablyavailable by telephone)
i^.
^^^art^lVlander^reascnahly available in person)
p
Mr f^ason Milliman (notreasonahlyavailahleby telephone)
q. SACafderR^obertson(no1 reasonably available by telephone)
r
SA David Shaver(reasonably available in person)
s. Ms. lihrteahShowman(not reasonably available by telephone)
L
SA Alfred ^itiiamson (reasonably available in person)
u. CPTBarelay Keay (not reasonably avatiable by telephone)
V. SCTDanielPadgen(reasonably available in person)
w. Inmate Christopher ^Vfii1field(notreasonablyavatiable^by telephone)
X RADM Kevin Donegan(no1reasonablyavailable statement underpenalty of peijuiy)
y. Mr. Rofiert Betz (notreasonablyavailable statement underpenalty of perjury)
z. LtCenRobert Schmidle (notreasonablyavatiable statement underpenalty ofpeijuty)
aa. VADM Robert Harward (notreasonablyavdlable statement underpenalty of peijury)
bb. Mr. Patrick Kennedy (notreasonablyavailable statement underperialty of perjury)
cc. RADMDavid^oods(notreasonablyavailable^statement underpenalty of peijury)
dd PersonsubscribingBa1esnumbers00378148-0037^175and00410^23-00410^34(notreasonably
penally of perjury)
Thankyou.
LTC Almanza
Classification; UNCLASSIFIED

Undassified Email Article 32 0173

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

available

Slalemenlunder

^^^^-'^^^^^
02938062

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29540

Fein./^hdenCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MOWSJA
Wednesday.December 14,2011 11:04 PM
Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC; A1manza,PauLp(b) (6)
coombs@annycourtmartia1defensecom;Oyergaard,AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW
SJA: Monow IIL JoOean,CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA; Matthewkemkes; Holzer, Mart^
LTCMIL USA OTJAG; Whyte, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA;
(b) (6)
RE: Oefense requesfedwifnessdefenninafions. list of personal/felephone/otheri^nesses
(UNCLASSIFIED)

Sir,
Thankyou. I thought t h e d e f e n s e withdrew i t s request f o r W h i t f i e l d a f t e r today's telephone
conversation?
V/r
CPTFein

UnclassifiedEmail Article 32 0174

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02215963

From:
Sent:
To:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29541

coombs@armycourtmartialdefensecom
Wednesday.December 14,201111:15 PM
Fein, AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW (b) (6)
il>;
Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC>; Almanza,
Paul (b) (6)
Overgaard, AngelM
CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
il>; Morrow
BLJ^Dean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
>; Matthew kemkes
>; Holzer, MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
>;Whyte,JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)

Subject:

RE: Delense requested wimess determinations, list of personal/telephone/c^her wimesses
(LINCLASSIFIED)

AIL
ToclariIy,the defense withdraws its requesfyvith respectto Inmate Whitfield only ifthe delense's closure
motion (actud closure orthe request to remove the media and issueagag order) is denied Ifthe defi^nse's
closure motion isgranted, the delense wouldlike toquestion Inmate Whitfield.
BesL
David
DavidE Coombs, Esq
Law Office ofDavidECoombs
IlSouthAngeti SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TotiFree:1800^588^156
Local: (508)689-4616
Fax; (508)689-9282
l2^.nibs@army^ourtm^
w^vwarmycourtmartiddefensecom
***ConfidenttdityNotice:Thisfransmission,induding attachments, may contdn confidential attomey-client
information and is intended fortheperson(s)or company named. If you arenottheintended recipiem, please
notify the sender and delde all copies, Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use ofthis infi;irmation may be
unlawful and is prohibited ***

Undassified Email Artide 32 0175

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219237

From:
Seot:
To:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29542

Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC(b) (6)
>
Thursday.December 15,20111113 AM
Overgaard, AngdM CPTUSAJFHQ NCR/MDWSJA
coombs@armycourtmartiddefensecom; Whyte, JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW
SJA Almanza. Paul
(b) (6)
; Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
il>;
Holzer,MarkLTCMILUSAOTJAG>;Fein,AshdenCPT
USAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
Morrow III, JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>
Reconsideration ofclosure determination and delense requested yyimess determinations,
list of personal/telephone/otherwimesses (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification UNCLASSIFIEO
A1IAfferreeonsideringmydenial ofthe defensecl^rerequesiandthe delense'srequesiinthe d^rnalivet^
any diseussionasto the fivelopicsal issue and issueagag orderconcermng tiiose topics, my determine
Accordingly,Iwill amendtiiewitness lists belowto remove Inmate ^lilfiekl As soonaslhavelheabihtyto amend those
documents and sendtiiemloyou.lvviti.
F^LIani also vvoiking onascnpl forthe hearing andwitiimiteyour coimnenl on it thi^
LTCAhnan^

Undassified Email Artide 32 0176

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219236

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

29543

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

Alraanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC >
Thursday,Deceraber 15,201112:41PM
Oyergaard,AngdMCPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
coorabs@arraycourtraartialdefensecora;
(b) (6)
>;Whyte,
JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
Alraanza, Paul (b) (6)
>; Matthew kerakes
(b) (6)
>; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
; Holzer, MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
>;Mon^owBL^^Dean,CPTUSAJFHQ NCR/MDW SJA
il>(b) (6)
Revised defense requested witness determinations and list of personal/felephone/other
witnesses(UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification; LINCLASSIFIED
All
Permy email this morning, here's myreviseddefense requesi determinationsand list of personal/telephone/otherwitnesses.
LTC Almanza
a. SFCPaulAdkins(reasonably available in person)
b.
SPC Eric S.Baker(reasonably available in person)
c. ^01Kylel.Balonek(nolreasonably available by telephone)
d. SA Troy Benencoun(reasonably avatiable in person)
e. SSC Peter Bigelow(notreasonablyavailable by telephone)
f
CPTThomasChcrepko(no1reasonably available by telephone)
g. SA Antonio Edwards(reasonably available in person)
h. CPT Casey Fulton (reasonably available in person)
i.
SA Toni Crahain(notreasonai^ly avatiable by telephone)
). Mr. Mark .lohnson (reasonably available in person)
k. Mr AdrianLamo (reasonably available in person)
L CPT SlevenLim(reasonably available in person)
m.
SOTCIiadMadaras(no1reasonablyavailable by telephone)
n. SFC(1^)BrianMadrid (notreasonablyavailable by telephone)
0. SA Mark Mander (reasonably availahle in person)
p. Mr. JasonMitiiman (notreasonablyavatiable by telephone)
q.
SACalderRobertson(no1reasonablyavailable by telephone)
r
SADavidShayer(reasonably available in person)
s
Ms .lihrleah Showman (notreasonablyavailable by telephone)
L
SA Alfred ^itiiamson(reasonaf^ly available in person)
u
CPTBarelay Keay (notreasonablyavatiablebytelephone)
V. SCTDaiuelPadgenfreasonably avatiable in person)
w
RALIM KevinDonegan(notreasonablyavailai^le statemeni underpenalty of perjury)
X. Mr. RobertBelz (notreasonablyavatiable statementunderpenalty ofpeijuty)
y. LtCenRobert Schmidle(notreasonablyavailable statementunderpenal^ of perjuiy)
z. VADM 1^obertHarward(no1reasonablyavailable statement underpenalty of perjury)
aa. Mr. PatrickKennedy(no1reasonably available statement underpendty of perjury)
bb. RADMDavid^oods (notreasonably available slatementunderpenaltyofperjuiy)
cc PersonsubscribingBatesnnmbers00::^7^14^^0^7^175and00410^23^0410^34(nofreasonab1y
penalty ofperjuty)

Classtiication; UNCLASSIFIED

Undassified Email Article 32 0177

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

available

statementunder

02219229

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attach:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29544

Alraanza, PaulRLTC RES U S / ^ USARC (b) (6)
Thursday,Deceraber 15,2011 3:24PM
Overgaard,AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
Alraanza, Paul
coorabs@arraycourtraartialdefensecora; Alraanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC
(b) (b) (6)
;Whyte,JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(6)
Matthew kerakes
;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b)
(6)
<
Monow III,
JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
drafiBM32script(UNCLASSIFIED)
Manning Artide 32 Scripf doc

Classification; UNCLASSIFIED
All
This isadraft, and does notyet have the classified closure/opening sectionsyet Pleasereviewand submit comments. Also, CPT
Fein, please addtiieclosure/openingparts.
Thankyou
LTC Almanza
Classtiication; UNCLASSIFIED

Undassified Email Artide 32 0178

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02215959

From:

Sent:
To:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY
coombs@armycourtmartta1defense.com
Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:10 PM
Almanza, Paul RLTC RES USAR USARC Angd M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCRMDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Almanza, Paul

29545

>; Overgaard,

(b) (6)

Subject:

; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT
USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>; Matthew kemkes
(b) (6)
Holzer, Marie LTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
, Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>; (b) (6)
; Morrow BI,
JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
il>
RE: draft BM 32 script (UNCLASSff IED)

LTC Almanza,
The defense has no issues with your script.
BesL
David
David E. Cocnnbs, Esq.
Law Office ofDavid E Coombs
I I Soutii Angdl SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
Toll Free: 1-800-588-4156
Local: (508)689-4616
Fax: (508) 689-9282
coQmbs@.aoi.y.CQui^^
www.armvcourtmartiddefense.com
***Confidentiality Notice: This transmission, including attachments, may contain confidentid attomey-client
information and is intended for the person(s) or company named. If you are not the intended recipienL please
notify the sender and delete all copies. Unauthorized disdosure, copying or use of this information may be
unlayyfid and is prohibited.***

Unclassified Email Artide 32 0179

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02946144

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29546

Fein.AshdenCPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Thursday.December15. 2011 548 PM
'(b) (6)
1';Ho1zer,Mart^LTC MIL USA OTJAG;
'(b) (6)
';'coombs@annycourtmartia1defense.com'; Matthewkemkes;
'(b) (6)
Hughes. BrianALTCUSAJFHQ-NCR^DWSJA; Boston. LouisJMAJUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
Fw; Art 32 Script
111215 Art 32 Scripf docx

Sir,

Attached you w i l l f i n d the complete script for the article 32 hearing, including the battle
d r i l l s , the checklists, and the hearing closure script. Thank you very much.
Onbebalfof CPTFein,
WOl Ford

Undassified Email Article 32 0180

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02935914

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29547

Fein./^hden CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Thursday.DecemberlS, 2011 5:55 PM
(b)(
'coombs@armycourtmartiaklefense.com';'p(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(6)b
(b) (6)
'; Whyte. JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA;
Matthew
)
kemkes; Holzer.MarteLTC MIL USA OTJAG;'(b) (6)
';
Monow
IIL
(
JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR4^DW SJA
6
Re;drattBM32scri|^(UNCLASSIF1ED)
)

S i r . S t i l l having i t issues. T r y i n g t o access.

Undassified Email Article 32 0181

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219216

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attach:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29548

Alraanza,PaulRLTCRES USAR USARC (b) (6)
Thursday,Deceraber 15,2011 6:23 PM
Oyergaard,AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
>;coorabs@arraycourtraartialdefensecora;
(b) (6)
Alraanza, Paul (b) (6)
(b) (6)
>; Whyte, JeffreyH CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA 1>; Matthew kerakes
(b) (6)
>; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
Monow BLJ^Dean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
Deterrainations re: defense requested evidence (UNCLASSIFIED)
Manning Article 32 Defense Requested Evidence Deterrainations 121511.doc; Manning
Article 32 Defense Requested Witnesses Deterrainations 121511doc

UNCLASSIFIEO
Ati
Attached pleasefindmy determinationsregardingdefense-requested evidence. Afso, becauseltitinklinadvertently forgot to atlacha
copy of myreviseddeterntinationsregardingdefense requesied witnesses to an email this morning, I'maltaching
LTC Almanza
UNCLASSIFIED

UnclassifiedEmail Artide 32 0182

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219215

From:
Sent:
To:

29549

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY
Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC (b) (6)
Thursday.December 15,2011 6:55 PM

>

(b) (6)

L
coombs@armycourtmartialdefense com; Matthew kemkes
(b) (6)
>; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG

(b) (6)

Subject:

Re:Fw:Art32Script(UNCLASSB^IED)

UNCLASSIFIED
AtiOntiie "script toopenthecourtroom"p^eofthe script, pleasecrossouttilelinereading''10;(Snmmariz
(Uncla^ified))
Also.n^securilyofficerrecommendedthatladviseallpartiesconcerningiheirduti^io^lecicl^sified^
opentiigremarksAccodingly.iimiiediately before inviting thegovemmentrocatilheirfirslvvitnessld^^
Please let me know if you have am suggesled charts.
LTC Ahnanza

^

"Cl^stiiedtiifbmiation may be^senteddunngtiiis investigation Ati participants in this investigation shouldremainawareoftheir
duty andrespoiisibitilylo protect any anddl classified infomiation enuusted totiiein,and also oftiicirresponsi
withthe threeproiectiveodersapplicabletothis imestigation ShoddIhe needariseduringtestimo^^
infonnation thepartidpanishottidnotifytiielOandCourtSecurityOfficersothaiadel^^
poitkinoftheheanngforsuchclassifiedtestiniony Additionatiy.shoddanypanicipat^
discussclassifiedmaneis in an unplanned fashion, tl^partidpanl shodd immediately inf^
made ^liethertocloseaponion of the lieanng"

Undassified Email Artide 32 0183

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02933120

From:
Sent:
To:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

Fein, Ashden CPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Thursday.OecemberlS. 2011 853 PM
Almanza. PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC; (b(b) (6)
(b) (6)

Subject:

29550

)

coombs@annycourtmartialdefense.com; Matthewkemkes:
Holzer.MarteLTC MIL USA
(6
OTJAG
)
RE: Fw:Art32Scri^ (UNCLASSIFIED)

Sir,

I apologize for not reviewing any sooner. We are s t i l l workingonour commo issues. The
United States has no issue; however we requestthe counsel qualifications section can be
deleted before your voir dire.
Thank you.
v/r
CPTFein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA
Chief, Militaryjustice
Military DistrictofWashington ( 1 ^ )
(b) (6)

Undassified Email Article 32 0184

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02219214

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29551

Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
v>
TTiursday. December 15, 2011 10:28 PM
(b) (6)
Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
; coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com;
(b) (6)
Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
Matthew kemkes
(b) (6)
; Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Holzer, Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
; Mortow BL JoDean, CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; (b) (6)
Re: Determinations re: defense requested evidence (UNCLASSIFIED)

Counsel 1 giyi]% you notice thai I am leconsidenng m> witness determinationsregardingCPT Li^man, CPT Worseh. and CPT Critchfield
We'll discuss further tomotrow moming
Thank you.
LTC Almanza

Unclassified Email Article 32 0185

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02941890

From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

29552

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Fein, AsMen CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:31 PM
(b) (6)
'coombs@annycourtmartiaklefense.com'; (b) (6)
Fw: Closure request memo
[UntitledLI 512201121372200.pdf

;
; Matthew kemkes

S i r . Attached i s the gov notice of c l a s s i f i e d hearing. Only 2 sessions w i t h 1 witness.
Vr Cpt f e i n

Unclassified Email Article 32 0186

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219213

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29553

Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC (b) (6)
Friday,Deceraber 16, 20116:12PM
(b) (6)
raailraiLcoorabs@arraycourtraartialdeIensecora; Alraanza, Paul(
(b) (6)
; Overgaard, AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJAb
;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG )
(
(b) (6)
Matthew kerakes(b) (6)
6
Whyte,JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b)
(6)
<
; Fein, Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW )
(b)
(6)
SJA <
>; Morrow IB, JoDean, CPT USA JEHQNCR/MDW SJA >;
(b) (6)
i
Contactwith CPTFein (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification; UNCLASSIFIED
Ati
CPT Fein just informed meafewtninules ago thalACCA denied the writ seekitigastay and also the writ on behalf ofMr.Ass^^
He said Ihey were seeking informalion as to the status ofthe writ seeking my recusal.
^e did not discuss anything otherthan those matters
LTC Almanza
Classification; LINCLASSIFIED

Undassified Email Article 32 0187

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02941517

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29554

Fein, AsMen CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Friday. December 16. 2011 6:16 PM
Almanza, Paul R LTC RES USAR USARC; (b) (6)
;
coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com; Almanza. Paul; Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA
JFHQ-NCR/MOW SJA; Holzer. Mark LTC MIL USA OTJAG; Matthew kemkes; Whyte.
Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; Monow 111. JoDean. CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA; (b) (6)
RE: Contact with CPT Fein (UNCLASSIFIEO)

Sir,

I just confirmed with GAD andMr. Coombs that the writ was denied, not just the stay,
v/r
CPTFein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA
Chief, Military Justice
Military District of Washington (IWW)
(b) (6)

Unclassified Email Article 32 0188

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02941516

From:
Smit:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29555

Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHO-NCRA40W SJA
Saturday, December 17, 2011 11:05 PM
'(b) (6)
•coombs@amnycourtmartiaklefense.com'; '(b) (6)
(b) (6)
Holzer, Marie LTC MIL USA OTJAG; Matthew
kemkes; Whyte, Jeffrey H. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MOW SJA; Monow 111, JoDean, CPT USA
JFHQ-NCF?/MDW SJA;(b) (6)
Pana, Jairo A. WOl USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
Re: Contact witii CPT Fein (UNCLASSIFIED)

s i r . The United States requests a conference tranorrow morning p r i o r t o going on the record
t o discuss your r u l i n g a t the end of today. I f a l l p a r t i e s are a v a i l a b l e we could meet 9815.
Thank you. Vr CPT Fein

Undassified Email Artide 32 0189

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02219212

From:
Sent:
To:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY
Almanza, Paul >
Saturday,December 17,2011 11:56 PM
Fein,Ashden CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
(b) (6)

coombs@annycourtmartiddefensecom; Overgaard, AngelMCPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA Holzer, MarkLTC MIL
USAOTJAG; Matthewk^kes
(b) (6)
WhyTe,JeftireyHCPTUSAJEHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
>. Morrow IB, JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
(b) (6)

Ce:

ar(b) (6)
(b) (6)

Subject:

Re:ContactwitiiCPTFein(UNCLASS1FIED)

LParra,JairoAW01 USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA

Yes,Ianiavati^1eal0815.

Undassified Email Article 32 0190

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29556

02215953

From:

Sent:
To:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29557

coombs@arraycourtraartialdefense.cora
Friday,Deceraber23,2011 5:44 PM
Alraanza,Paul

;Eein, Ashden CPTUSAJEHQNCR/MDW
SJA(b) (6)
Overgaard, AngdMCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
l>;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) (6)
Matthew kerakes (b) (6)
Whyte,JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)
;Mon^owIII, JoDean, CPTUSAJFHQ
NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)

Cc:
Subject:
Attach:

a(b) (6)
l;Pan^a,JairoAWOI USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA
Defense Notice ofEvidence
DefenseNoticeofEvidence.pdf

LTC Alraanza,
lhave attachedadocuraent that addresses the two outstanding issues frora the Article 32 Let rae know ifyou
have any questions
BesL
David
DavidE Coorabs, Esq
Law Office ofDavidE Coorabs
IlSouthAngeti SfreeL #317
Providence, RI 02906
TotiFree:1 800 588^156
Locd: (508)689 4616
Fax:(508)689 9282
coombs@armycourtmartialdefensecom
www.armycourtmartialdefense.com

***ConfidentidityNotice:Thisfransmission,including attachraenfs,raaycontdn confidential attomey-client
inforraation and is intended forthe person(s)or corapany naraed Ifyou are not the intended recipiem, please
notify the sender and delete ati copies Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use ofthis inforraation raay be
udawful and is prohibited.***

Undassified Email Article 32 0191

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02189404

From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attach:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

29558

Williams, Patricia CIV JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>
Tuesday. December 27, 2011 4:40 PM
Fein, Ashden CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
l>;
Overgaard, Angel M. CPT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
1>; Morrow III, JoDean, CPT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
'coombs@annycourtmartiddefense.com'; Boston, Louis J. MAJ USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW
SJA Autry, Carolyn D Ms CIV JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>;
(b)
(6)
'
Bradley, Princeton L. SGT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
>; Feito, Beatriz SGT USA JFHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
>; Waybright, Daniel W. SGT
USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA >
En-ata Sheets For Classified Sessions -US v M Artide 32 (UNCLASSIFIED)
4-TRIAL COUNSEL ERRATA SHEET Classified Sessions.docx, 4- DEFENSE
COUNSEL ERRATA SHEET Classified Sessions.docx, 4-10 ERRATA SHEET
(Classified Sessions) docx

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
Good Aftemoon Please find attached the errata sheets for the classified sessions in US v M Article 32. The
actual transcript electrons are on a marked disc and should be secured in your area. They are
ready for review by both sides and should be sent out via SIPR to defense. If I have not done so
already, please convert them to a PDF document before sending out to defense counsel and the IO
for review. Your assigned paralegals should complete the errata process for these particular
transcripts.
The unclass transcripts are forthcoming and will be sent to you within the next 24-48 hotu%. They
also will be tumed over to the Team M paralegals to complete the errata process once they have
been sent to you. Thank you very much and have a good evening.
V/R,
Trisha

Undassified Email Artide 32 0192

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

02935391

From:
Sent:
To:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29559

Fein.AshdenCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Tuesday,Oecember27.2011 4:42PM
Williams, Patrida CIV JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA; '(b) (6)
(b) (6)

Cc:

Subject:

•coombs@armycourtmartiaklefense.com^; Boston, LouisJ. MAJ USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA;
Autry, CarolynDMs CIV JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA;'(b) (6)
; Bradley,
PrincefonLSGT USA JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA:(b) (6)
WaybrighL DanidWSGTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MOWSJA
Re; EnataSheetsForClassified Sessions USvMArticle 32 (UNCLASSIFIED)

Ms. Williams. Thank you. The prosecution w i l l e n s u r e t h e d e f e n s e and l O g e t versions o f t h e
c l a s s i f i e d e t c . SIPR won't be used.
Vr

CPTFein

Unclassified Email Article 32 0193

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02916092

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29560

Subject:
Attachments:

Fein, AshdenCPT USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
Tuesday.January 03, 2012 12:35 PM
Almanza,PadRLTC RES USAR USARC
coombs@annycourtmartia1defensecom(b) (6)
LOvergaani,AngelM
CPT USAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA; Ho1zer,MarteLTC MIL USA OTJAG; Matihewkemkes;
Whyfe. JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA; MonowllL JoOean,CPT USAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA; (b) (6)
Ford,ArthurD WOl USA JFHQNCR/MDWSJA
U S v P F C B M (Article 32 Update)
Artide 32TranscripLpdL Article 32 Exhibitspdf

Importance:

High

Sir,

Happy New Vearl Attached is the unclassified portion ofthe hearing's summarized transcript
along with an exhibit l i s t . Ms. Williams finished these on 28 Oec 11. The classified portion
is ready for your review at MOW and we w i l l deliveracopy to the defense by tomorrow
afternoon.
Additionally, the United States asks that you exclude, as a reasonable delay, anytime between
22December 2911 and 3 January 2012 that you did not work on the Article 32 investigation
based on the federal holidays and weekends.
Thank you.
v/r
CPTFein

Undassified Email Artide 32 0194

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02565206

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29561

A1manza,PaulRLTC RES U S / ^ USARC Wednesday.Januaiy 4, 20127:02 PM
Fein, Ashd^ CPTUSAJEHQ-NCR/MDW SJA >
coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com; (b) (6)
Overgaard,
AngdMCPTUSAJEHQ^NCR/MDWSJAHolzer, MarkLTC MIL (b) (6)
;
Matthew kemkes (b) (6)
>, Whyte, Jeffi^ey H.CPT USA
JFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
; Morrow IB,JoDean, CPT
USA JFHQ NCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
(b) (6)
LFortl,ArthurDW01USAJFHQ-NCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)

Subject:

Re:USvPFCBM(Article32Update)(UNCLASSIElED)

Classification; UNCLASSIFIED
CPTFeinThankyou. Iwtil exclude asareasonabledelaytiiedays betvveen23Decen^r20lland3Januaiy2012whenIdidnotwoik on the
Article 32 Investigation.
LTC Ahnanza

Undassified Email Article 32 0195

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

02565205

From:
Sent:
To:

Ce:
Subject:

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY

29562

Almanza, PaulRLTC RES USAR USARC Wednesday,January 4, 20127:04 PM
coombs@armycourtmartiaIdefense com; Almanza, Paul (b) (6)
>;
Fein,Ashden CPTUSAJFHQNCR/MDW SJA ;
(b) (6)
L Overgaard, AngdMCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW SJA
(b) (6)
m>;Holzer,MarkLTC MIL USA OTJAG
(b) >; Matthew kemkes
(6)
(b)
(6)
<
>;Whyte,JeffreyHCPTUSAJFHQ-NCR/MDW
SJAMorrow IB. JoDean, CPTUSA JEHQNCR/MDW SJA (b) (6)
LI^arra,JairoAW01 USAJFHQNCR/MDWSJA
(b) (6)

Re: DefenseNoticeofEvidence(UNCLASSIEIED)

ClassificationUNCLASSIFIED
Thank you, Mr Coombs
LTC Ahnanza

Undassified Email Artic1e 32 0196

FOROFFICIALUSEONLY



29563

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BASE men - HENDERSON HALL
204 LEE AVENUE
FORT MYER. VIRGINIA 22211-1199

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF

12 AUG L310


MEMORANDUM FOR Director, Forensic Fellowship, Walter Reed Army Medical
Center, Washington, DC 20307

SUBJECT: Extension ot?Ruic for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 706 Bradley Manning

I. Your request for an extension oftime to complete the Sanity Board Manning is:

approved. Submit your report three months from the date of this
memorandum.

approved, in part. Submit your report NLT six weeks from the date ofthis

memorandum.
approved. in part. Submit your report NLT
disapproved.

2. Any future extension oftime Inust be submitted through the Government counsel to me for
approvai.

Enel CARL R. COFFMAN, JR.
E-mail Request. 6 Aug 10 COL, AV
Commanding



29564




FromSubject: RE: RCM 706 Order (PFC Manning) (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 10:59:55 AM

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

MAJ Hurley:

We will proceed with this plan in mind (initial 6 week suspense date).

It is therefore likely that we will need an extension and will so

request along with an estimated time to completion if/when needed.
Please note that due to sd1eduling conflicts, we will begin evaluation

on 27 August. Please provide all standard relevant documents relates to
706 evaluations, report of criminal investigation, mental
health/medical records, ERB, etc. This may be sent by courier (FedEx or
similar service) to:

Michael Sweda, Chief, Forensic Psydiology Service
Walter Reed Army Medical Center

6900 Georgia Avenue NW

6 (Borden Pavilion), 3rd Floor

Washington DC 20307

v/ r,

Michael Sweda, ABPP (Forensic)

Board-Certi?ed Forensic

Chief, Forensic Service

Director, Forensic Fellowship Walter Reed Army Medical Center



"The United States themselves are essentially the greatest poem.
Past and present and future are not disjoined but joined."


From: Huriey, Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

1]
nt: ay, August 1

To: Sweda, Michael Dr CIV USA MEDCOM WRAMC

Cc: Fein, Ashden CPT USA Bouchard, Paul R. CPT USD-C
DSTB CO TDS Sr Defense Counsel; Eaton, Michael CPT USF-I SJ A Trial
Defense Attorney

Subject: RE: RCM 706 Order (PFC Manning) (UNCLASSIFIED)

8

29565

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Dr. Sweda

Ioarm one of PFC Manning's defense oounsel. I know we all (the attorneys
parties) appreciate your prompt attention to this matter, and I

grist we all want a thorough evaluation of PFC Manning that follows the
sigrsed by COL Coffman on 3 August. However, we (the defense) would be
comfortable with an initial six week suspense. If, at the end of

31>? tweeks, you need more time to complete a thorough evaluation, then we
would request that you forward a request for an extension that estimates
Ernie required to complete the process.

PFC Manning is in pre-trial con?nement, and we want to get his case
referred to trial sooner rather than later.

On a substantive note, we believe the order signed by COL Coffman is
suf?dent for the charges now preferred. There are no other additional
questions we want you to answer in the course of completing this matter.

Thanks.

v/r
Thomas F. Hurley
JA




From: Sweda, Michael Dr CIV USA MEDCOM WRAMC

Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 3:04 PM
To: Hurie Thomas MAJ MIL USA

orrow, ;Lange, ristopher


LTC MIL USA MEDCOM Montalbano, Paul Dr CIV Malone, Ricky
COL

MIL USA MEDCOM WRAMC
Subject: RE: RCM 706 Order (PFC Manning) (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

CPT Fein:

I have consulted with LTC Christopher Lange, who is my counterpart as
Director of the Forensic Fellowship, regarding the Manning
case.

We are in the process of assembling a team for the evaluation, and
expect

the direct evaluation piece (interview and testing) of this to be
completed



29566

in two weeks. Generally, we ask for at least a six week suspense date
of a 706 report. In the case of PFC Manning, we would like
Bequest a three month suspense from the date that he is first seen, to
thorough evaluation.

Please feel free to call or e-mail if you have any questions.

v/r,

Michael Sweda, ABPP (Forensic)

Board-Certi?ed Forensic

Chief, Forensic Service

Director, Forensic Fellowship Walter Reed Army Medical Center



"The United States themselves are essentially the greatest poem.
Past and present and future are not disjoined but joined."


From: Hurlev. Thomas MIL USA OTJAG

2 ay, ugust
To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA Sweda, Michael Dr CIV USA
MEDCOM WRAMC
Cc: Eaton, Michael usF-I s; A
Trial

Defense Attorney; Morrow, JoDean CPT MIL USA
Subject: RE: RCM er anning NCLASSIFIED)

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Dr. Sweda/CPT Fein

There is no need for the members of the board to have a security
clearance.

I will speak with PFC Manning tomorrow about the board and ensure that
his

answers to your questions do not include any classi?ed information. If
he

feels he must disclose classi?ed information, then he will let you know
that there is more that he wants to say but cannot. CPT Fein and I will
then seek an exception to the current order.

v/r
Thomas F. Hurley
MAJ, JA





29567


From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA


Sent:W ne y, ugust 1

To: Sweda, Michael Dr CIV USA MEDCOM WRAMC
Cc: Hurley, Thomas MAJ MIL USA
Eaton, Michael CPT USF-I SJ A Trial Defense Attorney;

Morrow, JoDean CPT MIL USA
Ject: Or er (PFC Manning) (UNCIASSIFIED)
Sir,

I do not foresee the need; however I rather defer that answer to MAJ
Hurley

and the defense team. There is one caveat. A current protective order
is

in place and it does not authorize the disclosure of any of the

classi?ed

infomwation related to this case without a?irmative authonzation. So

if

there ends up being a need, although doubtful, then the Government will
need

to work to get an exception to the protective order.

v/
CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDW)



Message--??-
From: Sweda, Michael Dr CIV USA MEDCOM WRAMC

Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:i0 PM

To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Cc: Hurley, Thomas MIL USA

Eaton, Michael CPT USF-I SJ A Trial Defense Attorney;


Subject: RE: RCM 706 Order (PFC Manning) (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Sir:
will the sanity board members require any level of security clearance

for
mis?

v/r.



29568

Midwael Sweda, ABPP (Forensic)

Board-Certi?ed Forensic

Chief, Forensic Service

Director, Forensic Fellowship Walter Reed Army Medical Center



"The United States themselves are essentially the greatest poem.
Past and present and future are not disjoined but joined."



From: Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
.

Sent: ay, August 03, 2010 11:07 AM

To: Sweda, Michael Dr CIV USA MEDCOM WRAMC

Cc: Hurley. Thomas MAJ MIL USA
_':Rose: ue 0- JA iemiitarv

ustice
Subject: RCM 706 Order (PFC Manning)
Importance: High

Sir,

Good morning. Attadwed is a RCM 706 Board Order for PFC Bradley
Manning.

Attadied is the order and a copy of the charge sheet. CCed on this
email

are the defense counsel (CPT Bouchard, CPT Eaton, and MAJ Hurley).
Please

advise of any delays and if your office needs additional time than the
allotted suspense, please forward the request through me for the
Convening

Authority.

CPT Fein

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

Unclassi?ed_Discovery_ManningB 000422

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDW)

Classi?cation: UNCIASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Classi?ca?on: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Classi?cation: UNCIASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Oassi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Classi?cation: UNCIASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE



29569

29570

3 September 20l0

MEMORANDUM THRU Su?? Judge Advocate. Office of the Staff Judge Advocate. US Anny
Military District of Washington. Fort Lesley J. McNair. Washington DC. 30219

FOR Commander. US Army Garrison. Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall. Fort Myer. Virginia
222-! I

SUBJECT: Request lb!? Appointment of Expert with Expertise in Forensic to Assist
the Defense in United State: PFC Bradley Manning.

1. On 25 August 2010. the defense requested that the R.C.M. 706 boaml be deiayed until a
forensic could be appointed to the defense team.

2. The defense would like to supptement their 25 August 2010 memorandum by requesting that
any de?ense appointed expen possess-a Top Secret Sensitive Compartmented information (TS-
SCD clearance.

3. The POC is the undersigned at (401) 744-3007 or by e-mail at


COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

29571

18 September 2010

THRLE Staff Judge Advocate. Office ofthe Staff Judge Advocate. US Army
Military District of Washington. Fort Lesley .\lcNair. Washington DC. 30219

FOR Commander. US Army Garrison. Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall. Fort Myer. Virginia
7771 1



Preliminary Classification Review ofthe Accused's Mental Impressions United
PH B?rucl/ey .l{cmm'ng

l. The defense believes that your order. dated 17 September 2010. directing PFC Manning to
disclose the classified information that he wishes to discuss with his defense counsel and the
Rules for Court-Martial (R.C.M.) 706 board to Mr. Charles Uaniel prior to disclosing this
information to his civilian and military defense counsel is not a lawful order and in contravention
ofthe holding of the Court of Appeals for the .Armed Forces (C.A.A.F.) in
Schmidt. 60 MJ. 1 (C.A.A.I-7. 2004). The order attempts to circumvent the important role ofthe
attorney-client relationship in maintaining the fairness and integrity ofthe military justice
system. As such. it is a violation Manning"s rights under the Sixth Amendment and
Article 27 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to the effective assistance of counsel in
preparing a defense. at 2. citing L7niiedSru!e.i' Kiivg. 53 MJ. 425 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

2. In the appellant was charged with dereliction ofduty for failing to exercise
appropriate flight discipline and failing to comply with rules ofengagement and special
instructions in an air?to~ground bombing incident that caused the deaths of several Canadian
soldiers in Afghanistan. The appellant was privy to classified information pertaining to his case.
The ruled. and the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed.
that the appellant could not discuss the classified aspects ofhis case with his civilian defense
counsel (who eventually obtained an interim security clearance) without submitting a request
through the trial counsel. The C.A.A.F. vacated the opinion and reversed the ruling
ofthe militaryjudge. holding that Military Rule ofEvidence (M.R.E.) 505 "does not require an
accused. without benefit of his own counsel. to engage in adversarial litigation with opposing
counsel as a precondition to discussing with defense counsel potentially relevant information"
that is already in the appellant's knowledge or possession. Schmidt. 60 at 2. As such. the
government cannot create a "classified information wall" between the accused and his defense
counsel as a precondition to the client being able to speak to his civilian and military defense
counsel. Id.

3. The defense is well aware of its obligations to safeguard classified information under Army
Regulation 380-5 and 18 l-i.S.C. 793. 794. and 798 and S0 421. Based upon this
knowledge. on 30 August 2010. the defense voluntarily returned classified information that was
given to it by the government without legal authority or proper authorization. See Attachment A.
Likewiise. on .7.5 August 2010. the defense alerted the government to the concern ofelassified
information being divulged during the R.C.M. 706 process. As such. the defense renews its
request that each defense counsel receive at least Top Secret Sensitive Compartmented





29572

Preliminary Classi?cation Review of the Accused's Mental Impressions
.SIuIe.s' /3?rudfe"t'

Information IS-SCI) clearance. 'l'he defense team is currently comprised ofthe following
counsel: Mr. David Coombs in the United States Army Reserves): MAJ Matthew J.
Kentkes; and CPT Paul R. Bouehard.

4. Additionally. the defense renews its request for limited authorization for PFC Manning?s
access to classified information. It is likely that PFC .\1anning?s access has been suspended due
to the preferred charges. It is anticipated that the defense will need to discuss and share access to
the classified information at issue in this case with our client. Therefore. the defense requests
authorization for limited access to classified information by the accused in accordance with
M.R.E.

5. In order to comply with the preparation and filing of 5(J5(h) notice. the defense
requests that the protective order dated 17 September 2010 be amended to reflect the following
additional guidance:

a. The accused and defense counsel shall prepare forthwith. but in no event later than
business days before any 706 Board, Article 32 Investigation. or court hearing. a brief
written description ofany information known or believed to be classified. which the accused
reasonably expects to disclose or cause to be disclosed in any pre?trial motion or proceeding. or
at trial of this case. hereinafter referred to as "the Aceuseds Disclosure as required
under Military Rule of Evidence

b. For purposes ofpreparing the Accused's Disclosure .\'otice. defense counsel. subject to
compliance with the applicable provisions of this Order. shail be allowed to discuss.
communicate and receive information from the accused concerning any matter believed by the
accused to contain. involve or relate to classified information. and believed by the accused to
relate to this case. Any retained civilian defense counsel shall also comply with the provisions of
this Order before having access to said classified information.

c. The accused. through counsel. shall advise the (?onvening Authority and the trial counsel
when he has prepared or possesses the Accused's Disclosure Notice or any Other material which
the accused or counsel believes contains classified information. which he intends to offer at any
R.C.M. 706 Board. the Article 32 Investigation. file in court or use in court. and shall then
deliver to the Court Security officer directly. or by means ofa courier designated by the Court
Security Officer. the Accused's Disclosure Notice and all copies thereof. or any other pleadings.
All Associated materials and other documents ofany kind or description containing any ofthe
information in the Accused's Disclosure Notice shall be stored under conditions prescribed by
the Court Security Officer.

d. Until further ()rder ofthe Convening Authority or the Court. the Accused Disclosure
Notice and all other written pleadings shall be delivered to the Court Security Officer. The time
of delivery to the Court Security Officer shall be considered the date offiling. fhe Court
Security Officer shall review such pleadings and shall determine with the assistance
and consultation of the attorney for the government and any personnel from any agency



29573

SUBJECT: Preliminary Classification Review ofthe Accused?s Mental Impressions Um?/ed
Slates PFC Bmcl/e_t'

necessary to make such determination. whether any of the material submitted is classified. and
the level of any such material. lfthe pleading or information does not contain
any classified information. the Court Security Officer shall forward it to the R.C.M.
706 Board or Article 32 Investigating Officer or Court for routine tiling. lfthe pleading does
contain classified information, or information which might lead to or cause the disclosure of
classified information. the Court Security Officer shall. after consultation with the trial counsel
and original classification authority:

1) mark it appropriately:

give a marked copy to the trial counsel:

have the original filed under seal and stored under appropriate security



7
"9
.3
conditions.

In this way. any documents containing classified information (or information believed to be
classified and which must undergo a classification determination) which are filed shall be sealed
by order of the Convening Authority.

6. The defense requests acknowledgement of receipt ofthis response. The defense further
requests that the Convening Authority rescind his "Preliminary Classification Review Order"
dated 17 September 2010 and amend his "Protective Order" as discussed above.

7. The POC is the undersigned at (-101) or by e-mail at


ii . 1?
.i





. AVID E. COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel





29574

DEPARTIIENTOFTHEARMY

IMLEEAVDJIIE

3? FORT IVER. VIRGNIA Z11-1199

OF

I 2 OCT . 310

MEMORANDUM FOR Mr. David E. Coornbs. Civilian Defense Counsel

SUBJECT: Appointment of Defense Expert Consultant in Forensic - g,s. v, PFQ
Bgleg Manning

1. I reviewed your request for appointment of an expert consultant in forensic for the
defense in the above-named case. After careful consideration, the defense request is:

(WT. approved. I appoint C01. David M. Benedek as an expert consultant in the above
named case. I furtherdireet that COL Benedek bedesignated a member ofthedefenseteam
under . 25 MJ. 270 (C.M.A. I987) and Military Rule of [Evidence 502. This
expert appointment is at no expense to the United States beyond mileage reimbursement. if
authorized.

disapproved.

2. The senior member of the RCM 706 board. in consultation with the accused?: primary care
behavioral health povider. will determine the extent to which COL Benedelt may participate in
the RCM 706 inquiry. including whether the defense expert consultant may be permitted to
monitor the examinations conducted by members of the RCM 706 board.

?i

ARI. R. COFFMAN. JR.
COL. AV
Commanding

29575

18 February 201 1

MEMORANDUM THRU Staff .ludge Advocate. Office ofthe Staff .ludge Advocate, US Army
Military District of Washington, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington D.C. 30219

FOR Commander, US Army Garrison, Joint Base Myer-Henderson l-lall, Fort Myer, Virginia
2221

SUBJECT: Request for Appointment of Expert Assistance With Expertise in
to Assist the Defense in United States v. Manning

1. Purpose. Pursuant to R.C.M. 703(d), the accused. PFC Bradley Manning. requests a
Department of Defense employee and a be designated as a member of
the defense team under Military Rule of Evidence M.R.E. 502, and United States v. oledo, 25
270 (CMA 1987). PFC Manning also requests that arrangements. in coordination with
Defense Counsel, be made to have the appointed expert visit the Quantico Brig to conduct
independent testing of PFC Manning.

2. Law. A military accused has, as a matter of Equal Protection and Due Process. a right to
expert assistance when necessary to present an adequate defense. United States v. Garries, 22
288 (CMA 1986); United States v. Robinson 39 MJ. 88 (CMA 1994), and Ake v.
Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 226 (1971 The Court ofAppeals for the Armed Forces has embraced a
three-part test for determining whether govemn1ent?funded expert assistance is necessary. The
defense must show:

?First. why the expert assistance is needed. Second, what would the expert assistance
accomplish for the accused. Third. why is the defense unable to gather the evidence that the
expert assistant would be able to develop.? United States v. Gonzalez, 39 459 (1994).

3. Basis. All of the above requirements for employment of an expert are present and the defense
is entitled to have an expert appointed to the defense as a matter of law. The govemment has
begun the process of conducting a sanity board on PFC Manning. The defense is requesting a
single Department ofDefense to assist in understanding the work of the sanity
board. to possibly suggest additional testing to the sanity board, to interpret the results of
testing conducted by the sanity board, to critically evaluate the work of the
sanity board, and to potentially conduct additional testing in order to prepare a rebuttal to the
conclusions of the sanity board.

a. Why Is Expert Assistance Needed? Expert assistance is needed to aid the defense in
understanding medical information and testing concerning the mental status
of PFC Manning on the date of the alleged crimes. to determine whether he is able to understand
the nature and quality of the wrongfulness ofhis conduct, to evaluate whether PFC Manning is
able to intelligently assist in his defense. and to prepare a possible sentencing case in extenuation
and mitigation for PFC Manning. In short, the defense needs this assistance to better understand
how PFC Manning?s brain was working at the time ofthe charged offenses and how it is

29576

SUBJECT: Request for Appointment ofan Expert with Expertise in Information Assurance to
Assist the Defense in the case of United States v. Marming

working now. The knowledge required to do this is specialized, and concerns medical and
data that is beyond the scope of defense counsel?s understanding.

b. What Would the Expert Assistance accomplish for the Accused? A
assigned to the defense would assist the defense in understanding the wide range of
tests that are available to evaluate PFC Manning. This expert would also
help the defense understand what tests are best suited to evaluate PFC Manning. A
would also assist the defense in interpreting and critically evaluating any
testing conducted by the sanity board. A would also be
able to explain medical research in the ?eld of and its relevance to the present
case. This expertise is beyond that of the current defense expert Capt. Kevin Moore, a forensic


c. Why is the Defense Unable to Gather this Evidence on Their Own? The defense has
neither the experience nor expertise to adequately prepare this case. The defense counsel needs a
basic understanding in order to present the defense case, including the need to prepare defense
experts to testify. It will be difficult for the defense to properly prepare without having an
individual who has the con?dentiality guaranteed to protect the accused. A more relevant
question is why the defense needs a separate if one is appointed to the sanity
board. The defense needs this separate for a number of reasons. First, any
who is a member of a sanity board is not a member of the defense team and
the defense does not have the ability to discuss possible case theories with that sanity board
member. A appointed to assist the defense is able to engage in full and frank
discussions with the defense on all aspects of the case and any issues relating to metal
competency. Second, a working for the sanity board would be under no
obligation to conduct additional evaluations and testing requested by the defense. A
appointed to the defense would be free to conduct additional testing without
the constraints of the sanity board. Third, the sanity board will likely conduct their evaluation of
PFC Manning without the benefit of a complete social history, and the board would not
incorporate that information into their evaluation and testing. A appointed to
the defense would continue to work with the defense in all stages ofthe case and incorporate
detailed information of PFC Manning's social history into the testing and diagnostic process.
Finally, testing and interpretation is a very subjective science. Any testing
done by members of the sanity board must be subjected to critical analysis. It is highly unlikely
that a member of the sanity board will objectively criticize their own work. The defense needs
an independent to assist them in conducting this critical inquiry. For all of
these reasons, the defense requests a be appointed to the defense team.

4. Conclusion. For the above reasons. the defense requests that you issue an order appointing a
as an expert; that you instruct this individual that he/she is a "defense
representative? and thus part of the defense team, and that matters related to him/her during the
course of his/her employment as a member of the defense team will be confidential.

29577

SUBJECT: Request for Appointment of an Expert with Expertise in Information Assurance to
Assist the Defense in the case of United States v. Manning

5. The POC is the undersigned at (401) 744-3007 or by e-mail at





DAVID E. COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

29578

20 April 2011

MEMORANDUM THRU StaffJudge Advocate, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate. US Army
Military District of Washington. Fort Lesley J. McNair. Washington D.C. 30219

FOR Commander, US Army Garrison, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall. Fort Myer, Virginia
2221 1

SUBJECT: Request for Appointment ofa to Assist the Defense in the Case
of United States v. Manning

1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 46 ofthe Uniform Code ofMilitar_v Justice and Rule for
Court~Martial (R.C.M.) 703(d), the defense requests the appointment ofa
located at or near Fort Leavenworth, Kansas to replace LCDR Carrie H. Kennedy and assist the

defense in the above-styled case. The defense further requests that this replacement expert be

designated as a member of the defense team under Military Rule of Evidence M.R.E. 502. and
Um'rea?Srmes 12 Toledo. 25 M.J. 270 (CMA 1987).

2. On 19 April 201 I, the defense, like many others. learned that PFC Maiming was being moved
to the Joint Regional Correctional Facility at Fort Leavenworth. Due to this abrupt move, LCDR
Kennedy is no longer ideally suited to ful?ll the role of the defense expert. At this point, LCDR
Kennedy has not had the ability to meet with PFC Manning. As such, no
relationship has been established. The defense requests that the government provide a suitable
replacement for LCDR Kennedy who will have the ability to aid the defense in understanding
medical information and testing concerning the mental status of PFC
Manning on the date ofthe alleged offenses. to evaluate whether PFC Manning is able to
intelligently assist in his defense. and to prepare a possible sentencing case in extenuation and
mitigation for PFC manning.

3. The POC is the undersigned at (401) 744-3007 or by e-mail at



DAVID E. COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

29579

26 April 2011

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, Joint Base Myer Henderson Hall. 204 Lee Avenue. Fort
Myer, VA 22211-1199

SUBJECT: Government Request for Delay of Article 32 Investigation. United States vs. PFC
Bradley E. Manning

1. On 25 April 201 l. the Government requested that you delay restarting the Article 32
Investigation until the United States received consent from all ofthe Original Classification
Authorities (OCAS) to release discoverable classi?ed evidence and information to the defense. It
appears that no OCA has given such approval since the Defense has yet to receive any classified
evidence or information. Without this information, the Defense is unable to adequately prepare
for the Article 32.

2. In order to avoid any additional unnecessary delay. the Defense requests that you order the
Government to:

a. Provide either a substitute for or a summary ofthe information for relevant classified
documents;

b. Allow the Defense to inspect any and all unclassified documents, tangible items. and
reports within the Governments control. which are material to the Defense's preparation. Rule
for Court-Martial (R.C.M.) 405(g)(l and 70l(a). The standard set out in R.C.M.
405 and R.C.M. 701 requires the Government to turn over items that are within the
?Government?s control." This means that the Trial Counsel. upon Defense request. has an
af?rmative obligation to seek out requested evidence that is in the possession ofthe
Government even if that evidence is not already in the immediate possession of the Trial
Counsel. United States v. I/I/illiams. 50 M..I. 436, 441 (C.A.A.F. 1999). The ?prosecutor will be
deemed to have knowledge ofand access to anything in the possession. custody. or control of
any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant.? Umted States v.
Bryan. 868 F.2d 1032, 1036 Cir. 1989); Williams, 50 M.J. at 441. The Defense specifically
renews its request for discovery previously either denied or not provided by the Government.
See Attachment A AND

c. Ensure the Defense has equal access to CID and other law enforcement witnesses by
requiring the Trial Counsel to make available any requested witness. R.C.M. 405(g)(l and
703(a) establishes that the prosecution and defense ?shall have equal opportunity to obtain
witnesses and evidence." See also Article 46, UCMJ. The Defense has attempted to interview
several ofthe CID agents in this case. On 14 April 2011. the Defense received an email from
Deputy Director Daniel T. Andrews ofthe Computer Crime Investigative Unit, requesting that
the Defense coordinate all witness interview requests through MDW Trial Counsel. Speci?cally.
the Defense requests the ability to speak with SA Toni M. Graham. SA Thomas A. Smith, SA
Kenneth A. King, SA Charles T. Ames Jr., SA Mark A. Mander, SA Randall A. Bethke. SA



29580

SUBJECT: Government Request for Delay of Article 32 Investigation, United States vs. PFC
Bradley E. Manning

Matthew J. Haywood, SA Jennie R. Lisciandri, CW2 Nathan E. Langley. SA Calder L.
Robertson Ill, SA David S. Shaver, and SA Ronald Rock.

3. Due to the limited discovery provided so far, it is likely that the Article 32 will need to be
delayed again unless the above information is provided in a timely manner. The Defense

requests that any additional delay be credited to the Government.

4. The point ofcontact for this memorandum is the undersigned at (401) 744-3007.



Encls DAVID EDWARD COOMBS
As Civilian Defense Counsel

29581

UNITED STATES
DEFENSE DISCOVERY
REQUEST

MANNING. Bradley li.. PFC
us. Army. -
Headquarters and Headquarters Company.

Army Garrison. Joint Base t\lyer-Henderson Hall.
Fort Myer. VA 222] I

29 October 2010



. In accordance with the Rules for Courts-Martial and the Military Rules of
Evidence. Manual for Courts-Martial. United States. 2008. Article 46,
Unifomt Code of Military Justice, and other applicable law, request for
discovery is hereby made for the charged offenses in the case of United States
v. Bradley E. Manning.

a. A copy of any handwritten. typed or recorded statements by the accused or
any other potential witness in connection with the investigation of this case
made to representatives ofthe government to include summaries of
conversations with representatives of the government. which were not
attached as allied papers at the time the charges were preferred.

b. The contents of all statements. oral or written. made by the accused that
are relevant to the case. known to the trial counsel, and within control ofthe
armed forces. The defense speci?cally requests that any statement made by
the accused that the trial counsel intends to introduce into evidence be
reduced to writing and disclosed to the defense. The defense needs these
statements in written form in order to prepare motions to suppress under
M.R.E. The defense also requests any derivative evidence be
disclosed to the defense M.R.E. *Speeitically, defense
requests the complete Instant Message chat log and any emails allegedly sent
between PFC Manning and Mr. Adrian A. Lamo.

e. Disclosure of all evidence seized from the person or property of the
accused, whether believed to be owned by the accused or anyone else, that the
prosecution intends to offer into evidence against the accused at trial.
?Specifically. defense requests the results of any examination of computers
allegedly used or owned by PFC Manning, and for the government to make
the hard drives from these computers accessible to the defense computer
forensic expert Mr. Eric Lakes of Cyber Agents lne.. 128 Southland Drive.
Lexington, Kentucky. 40503.



29582

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

d. Copies of all medical and mental reports relating to the accused.
*Specif1cally, the defense requests copies ofany behavioral health
assessments of PFC Manning both before, during, and after the deployment to
Iraq.

e. evidence tending to diminish credibility of any witness
including, but not limited to, prior convictions under M.R.E. 609, evidence of
other character, conduct, or bias bearing on witness credibility under M.R.E.
608. Specifically, the defense requests the name and contact information for
any law enforcement agent working with Mr. Adrian A. Lamo. See Brady
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963): Um'tedSrates v. Agurs, 427 US. 97 (1976).
The defense also requests any other evidence in the possession of the
government favorable to the accused. or tends to negate the guilt of the
accused of any offense charged, or reduce the punishment for any offense
charged.

f. The names and contact information for all government investigators who
have participated or are presently participating in the investigation ofthe
case.

g. Any evidence ofother crimes, wrongs, or acts which the prosecution seeks
to introduce for any purpose whatsoever. See M.R.E. 404(b).

h. All personal or business notes. memorandums. and writings prepared by
investigators in said case which are not fumished pursuant to any other
provisions ofthis request.

i. The military status of all witnesses. Where applicable. the defense requests
the date of separation from the Army, and the discharge provisions used to
effect such discharge if for other than completion ofthe obligated term of
service. Pursuant to M.R.E. 301 disclosure is requested of any
immunity or leniency pertaining to witnesses or potential witnesses.

j. The Tactical Sensitive Compartment Information (T-SCIF) accreditation
packet for FOB Hammer. The SOP for the at FOB Hammer. The
name and contact information for the security manager at the T-SCIF at FOB
Hammer. A copy of the Security Classification Guide (SCG) for the
at FOB Hammer. PFC Manning's training records related to his MOS. Any
documentation PFC Manning has signed dealing with information security.
A list of any refresher training or in?country training PFC Manning has
received on information security.

k. Any evidence of prior Article 15 action, civilian or military convictions,
and adverse administrative actions relating to any ofthe government's

29583

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

witnesses, defense witnesses, or the accused. Any evidence that the
government intends to use for impeachment purposes ofthe accused, or any
other witness. This inciudes any character evidence the govemment intends
to introduce at trial under M.R.E. 404.

l. A list of all witnesses the prosecution intends to call during the Article 32
along with their addresses and phone numbers and copies of all prior written
statements.

m. Copies ofall business and official records which the prosecution intends
to introduce either during the Article 32 or at trial.

n. A list of all exhibits the government plans to utilize at the Article 32 or at
trial.

0. Any evidence, testimony, or witnesses the government intends to use at
the Article 32 or at trial that have been obtained through grants ofimmunity,
or any other concessions being granted to a witness, the content of such
testimony or evidence. and the terms of any such grants ofimmunity or
concessions.

p. All documents, memoranda, or records of conversations pertaining to this
case, whether prepared by investigators, commanders. convening authority or
any other person. The request in this paragraph includes but is not limited to:

A compete copy ofthe CID file(s) (including but not limited to the so-
called "right" and "left side") interviews, notes, and Agent Activity
Summaries or any other liles maintained by a law enforcement agency at Fort
Myer, Fort Drum, Contingency Operating Station Hammer, or any other
installation that participated in the investigation ofthis case.

(2) A complete copy ofany other documents or files pertaining to the
above named individual.

(3) A complete copy of any emails or memorandums relating to the
preferral of charges in this case or to the level ofcourt-martial.

q. Any writings used to refresh the memory of any government witness. IAW
M.R.E. 612.

r. Copies of the report concerning the polygraph examinations administered
to any person related to this case. This includes copies of statements taken
after the polygraph exam.

29584

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

5. A copy of any Freedom of lnforrnation Act (FOIA) request and any
response or internal discussions of any such OIA request that is related to
the classified video charged in Specification 1, Charge I and Specification]
2, and 5 of Charge ll.

2. The defense requests that the government informs the defense counsel if it
does not intend to comply with any speci?c provision of this request.

3. It is understood that this is a continuing request.

4. A copy of this request was served on Trial Counsel by email on 29

October 2010.


DAVID EDWARD COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

29585

UNITED STATES
DEFENSE DISCOVERY
REQUEST

MANNING. Bradley PFC

U.S. Anny.

Headquarters and Headquarters ompany. U.S.
Army Garrison. Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall.
Fort Myer, VA 22211

DATED: 15 November 2010



I. In accordance with the Rules for Courts-Martial and the Military Rules of
Evidence, Manual for Courts-Martial. United States, 2008. Article 46.
Uniform Code ot?Military Justice. and other applicable law, request for
supplemental discovery is hereby made for the charged otlenses in the case of
United States v. Bradley E. Manning.

2. The defense requests that the government respond to each item listed in its
29 October 2010 discovery request and the following additional discovery:

a. The names and contact information for all govcmment investigators who
have participated or who are presently participating in the investigation of the
case. previously requested on 29 October 20l0. Specifically. the names of
the investigators and an inventory of the items seized from the home of Ms.
Debra Van 1492 Selworthy Road. Potomac, MD 20854 on 2
November 2010. Additionally. a list ofitems seized from Mr. David House
and a copy of all reports or analysis of the items seized by the Department of
Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or any other
government agency on 3 November 2010. Finally. a copy of all field
interviews and reports conducted by the FBI or any other governmental
organization involving witnesses from Boston. Massachusetts or any other
city from 24 Ma_v 2010 to the present involved in this case.

b. The entire counseling packet for PFC Manning. Specitically, any
counseling or assessments done of PFC Manning by his chain of command.
MSG Paul Adkins. CPT Casey Martin. SSG Peter Bigelow. PT Matthew
Freeburg. or Mark Woodworth.

c. All Behavioral Health Assessments (BHA) or mental evaluations of PFC
Manning. previously requested by the defense on 29 October 2010. The
defense requests any assessment by CAPT Kenneth J. lverson. CAPT Bruce
Balfour. CAPT William Hocter. CPT Eden ritch?eld, PT Dale Hill or any
other individual who has evaluated or commented on PFC Manning?s mental
state at any time. Speci?cally. the defense requests the 22 May and 28 May



29586

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

2010 BHA, and all assessments for POI recommendations to the Quantico
Con?nement Facility. I

d. Any and all documents or emails considered by CPT Kevin Ley as the
military magistrate to support his search and seizure authorizations.

e. Recorded video footage of when PFC Manning collapsed in confinement
as referenced at 000095 and any other recorded audio or video footage of
PFC Manning while in con?nement either in Iraq, Kuwait. or the United
States.

f. Network logs for all computers searched by CPT Thomas Cherepko or any
other government employee or investigator as referenced at 000186-87.

g. The application. Security and System Network logs obtained from PFC
Blake Dudley as referenced at 0000187.

h. The results of SA Calder Robertson and SA David Shaver?s
analysis of any computers analyzed in this case as well as copies of any
investigative notes or assessments by Computer Crimes Investigative Unit
(CCIU). Additionally, the names of all individuals from the CCIU or any
other government agency that have performed or are performing any
computer forensic analysis in this case.

i. All documentation or information provided by the government to LTC
Craig Merutl-ca. Specifically. copies ofthe chat logs referenced at 000455 and
copies of the CC IU reports referenced at 000463.

j. The results ofinquiry/investigation and all discussions and assessments
done in compliance with Department of Defense (DOD) Directive 5210.50.
Directive 5200.1 Chapter 10. S-5105.21-M-1, Instruction
5240.4, and Executive Order 13526. Specifically, the defense requests the
answers to the following required investigative determinations by the above
Directives. Instruction, and Executive Order: When. where, and how
did the incident occur? What persons, situations, or conditions caused or
contributed to the incident?? What classi?ed information was compromised?
If a compromise occurred, what speci?c classified information and/or
material was involved? If classi?ed information is alleged to have been lost,
what steps were taken to locate the material?? In what specific media article
or program did the classi?ed infonnation appear?? To what extent was the
compromised information disseminated? Was the infonnation properly
classi?ed?? Was the information oflicially released? Are there any leads to
be investigated that might lead to identification of the person(s) responsible
for the compromise?





29587

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

k. The defense also requests copies of any noti?cation to the Original
Classi?cation Authorities (OCA), the contact information for the OCAS, and
the required answers by DOD Directive that states when noti?ed of the
compromise of classified information or material, the original classi?cation
authority for that information or material shall: Verify the classi?cation and
duration ofclassi?cation initially assigned to the information; Reevaluate the
classi?cation of the information to determine whether the classi?cation
should be continued or changed; and complete a damage assessment in
accordance with Instruction and Directive. The veri?cation,
reevaluation and damage assessment process is required by Directive to
be completed as soon as possible following noti?cation of a compromise.

3. The defense requests that the government informs the defense counsel if it
does not intend to comply with any speci?c provision ofthis request.

4. It is understood that this is a continuing request.

5. A copy of this request was served on Trial Counsel by email on I5
November 2010.



DAVID EDWARD COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

La.)

29588

UNITEDSTATES
mscovr-:m'
REQUEST

Bradley E.. PFC

U.S. Army.

Headquarters and Headquarters Company. U.S.
Army Garrison. Joint Base .\1yer-Henderson Hall.
Fort Myer, VA 2221

8 December 2010



1. In accordance with the Rules for Courts-Martial and the Military Rules of Evidence.
Manual for lfnited States. 2008. Article 46. Uniform Code of.\lilitary
Justice. and other applicable law. request for supplemental discovery is hereby made for
the charged offenses in the case of United States Bradley Manning.

2. The defense requests that the government respond to each item listed in its 29 October
and 15 November 2010 discovery requests and the following additional discovery:

a) The names and contact information for all government investigators who have
participated or who are presently participating in the investigation of the case. previously
requested on 29 October and I5 November 2010. Speci?cally. contact information for
SA Hyung Kim from the Department of Defense and SA Richard Bowen from the Army
Computer Crimes Unit and an inventory ofthe items seized from the home of Paul
rancia at 60] Hazelwood Terrace. Rochester. .\ew York 14609.

b) All forensic results and investigative reports by the Department of State regarding the
information obtained by Wikileaks as referenced by Assistant Secretary of State for
Public Affairs PJ. Crowley. Additionally. any specific damage assessment by the
Department of State regarding the disclosures ofthe diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks.
Any assessment, report. e-mail. or document by Secretary ofState Hillary Rodham
Clinton regarding the disclosures of diplomatic cables by Wikileaks. Any report. e-mail.
or document discussing the need for the State Department to disconnect access to its files
from the govemment's classified network.

c) All forensic results and investigative reports by the Department of Defense regarding
the information obtained by Wikileaks and the results of any joint investigation with the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as referenced by Secretary of Defense Robert .
Gates. Additionally. any specific damage assessment by the Department ofDefense
regarding the disclosure ofclassified documents and videos. the subject ofthis case. by
WikiLeaks.

29589

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

d) Any and all documentation related to the Department oflustice investigation into the
alleged leaks by WikiLeaks as referenced by Attomey General ofthe United States Eric
H. Holder.

e) Any and all documentation related to President Barack H. Obama's order for an
investigation and a govemment wide~review of how agencies safeguard sensitive
information. Additionally, any and all documents related to the steps the administration
is considering regarding these leaks and the nature ofthe criminal investigation underway
into how the documents were made public as referenced by Robert Gibbs. the White
House spokesman.

f) Any assessment given. or discussions concerning. the Wikileaks disclosures by any
member ofthe govemment to President Obama. Any e?mail, report. assessment.
directive. or discussion by President Obama to the Department of Defense. Department of
State or Department of Justice.

g) Any and all documents relating to the Government Task Force created to review the
various WikiLeaks releases for potentially damaging information prior to the actual
releases. This Task Force apparently had over 120 members reviewing the documents
that were either released or pending release to determine the possible harm to national
security.

h) The results ofany investigation or review by Mr. Russell Travers who has been
appointed by President Obama to head an interagency committee assigned to assess the
damage caused WikiLeaks exposures and to organize efforts to tighten security measures
in government agencies.

i) Any and all documentation related to the Pentagon?s review on the policy and
technological shortfalls that led to the WikiLeaks disclosures as referenced by Pentagon
spokesman Bryan Whitman.

j) Any and all documentation related to the Central lntelligence Agency (CIA)
investigation of Wikileaks announced by CIA Director Leon Panetta and any internal or
external memorandums addressing the investigation of Wikileaks, PFC Bradley Manning
or the nature ofthe Office ofSecurity?s investigation into these matters.

k) Any and all documentation relating to the govemmenfs position oftaking a hard line
on unauthorized leaks ofinformation. as demonstrated by the prosecutions ofa former
National Security Agency official. a Federal Bureau of Investigation linguist. and a State
Department contractor and referenced by CIA Director Leon Panetta. Additionally, any
and all memorandums. e-mails. or other references by Congressmen. Senators, or
govemment officials conceming the disposition of this case or the need to punish
Bradley Manning.

29590

Defense Discovery Request Bradley E. Manning

1) Any and all documentation. e?mails, or reports given to the Summary Court-Martial
Converting Authority. the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, or the Staffjudge
Advocate concerning the disposition of Bradley Manning?s case or the nature ofthe
charges or possible charges against Manning. Specifically, any attempt to influence
the independent discretion of anyone involved in the military justice process.

m) Any and all documents or observation notes by employees ofthe Quantico
confinement facility relating to PFC Bradley

n) The results ofthe 15-6 investigation into the goventmenfs improper release of
classified information to the defense. Whether the 15-6 investigating officer looked into

the following additional potential spillage:

i. The disc allegedly found in PFC Manning?s Room indicated the contents were
SECRET. A photo ofthe disk can be found at 000293. Was the title on the disk
classified or not??

ii. The photos ofthe T-SCIF show a map in the background that was partially
exposed (000301 and 000302).

The snapshots ofthe computer screens in the T-SCIF were exposed. Was there
classified infomiation being viewed on the screen?? (000305 and 000306).

iv. The snapshots ofthe computers had documentation on the table appear to show
classified information. (000333. 000334, and 000335).

v. Was the investigating officer made aware ofthe govemment disclosure ofthe
original five discs to the military defense counsel??

3. The defense requests that the govemment inform the defense counsel if it does not
intend to comply with any specific provision ofthis request.

4. It is understood that this is a continuing request.

5. A copy ofthis request was served on Trial Counsel by e-mail on 8 December 2010.


AVID EDWARD CO was

Civilian Defense Counsel

29591

UNITED STATES
DEFENSE DISCOVERY
REQUEST

MANNING. Bradley E.. PFC
U.S. Anny.
Headquarters and Hea quarters Company. US.

Anny Garrison. Joint Base Myer?Henderson Hall.
Fort Myer. VA 2221

DATED: l0 January 20ll



1. In accordance with the Rules for Courts-Martial and the Military Rules of Evidence.
Manual for Courts-Martial. United States, 2008. Article 46, Uniform Code of Military
Justice, and other applicable law. request for supplemental discovery is hereby made for
the charged offenses in the case of United States v. Bradley E. Manning.

2. The defense requests that the government respond to each item listed in its previous
discovery requests on 29 October. 15 November. and 8 December 2010 and to also
respond to the following additional discovery:

Any infonnation relating to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d) order or any search warrant by the
govemment of Twitter, Facebook. Google or any other social media site. Any metadata,
MD5 hash marks or other unique identifying infonnation obtained from the 2703(d) order
or search warrant.

b) The results and all supporting documents for the investigation conducted by LTG
Robert Caslen Jr. The report is directed by the Secretary of the Amiy John McHugh and
is supposed to be completed by 1 February 201 1. It will address how PFC Bradley
Manning was selected for his job, how he was trained. whether his superiors missed
warning signs that he was downloading documents that he did not need to read and how
PFC Manning allegedly released the documents.

c) Results of any inquiry and testimony taken by House of Representative oversight
committee led by Representative Darrell lssa. The committee is due to look into
Wikileaks, the actions of Attomey General Eric Holder. and the investigation of PFC
Bradley Manning.

d) A copy ofall Agents Investigation Reports maintained under CID Regulation 195-]
not previously provided to the defense. A copy of all agent notes. other govemmental

investigative reports. and sworn statements.

3. The defense requests that the govemment infonn the defense counsel if it does not
intend to comply with any speci?c provision of this request.

4. It is understood that this is a continuing request.

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

5. A. copy ofthis request was served on Trial Counsel by e-mail on 10 January 201 1.

/3 /g
EDWARD
Civilian Defense Counsel

ls)

29592

29593

UNITED STATES
DEFENSE REQUEST TO
PRESERVE EVIDENCE

MANNING. Bradley E., PFC
Army,
Headquarters and Headquarters Company. U.S.

Anny Garrison. Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall.
Fort Myer. VA 22211

DATED: 19 January 201 1



1. In accordance with the Rules for Courts-Martial 701(a) and Manual for
Courts-Martial. United States, 2008. Article 46. Unifonn Code of Military Justice. and
other applicable law. defense counsel in the above entitled case respectfully request that
the U.S. Government preserve the confinement facility video tape of the alleged
disruptive behavior of PFC Bradley Manning and provide a copy to the defense for its
inspection.

2. On l8 January 20l l. the defense was noti?ed that PFC Manning, at the direction of
W04 James Averhart. was placed in suicide prevention. This decision was made over
the recommendations of Capt. William Hocter and the defense appointed expert Capt.
Kevin Moore. When PFC Manning was being ordered to surrender his clothes. the Brig
made the decision to videotape this event along with an interrogation of PFC Manning by
W04 Averhart and others.

3. In accordance with R.C.M. 70l(e), ?[e]ach party shall have equal opportunity to
inspect evidence." Defense counsel is requesting an equal opportunity to inspect the
video tape. The defense believes this evidence will support a motion for credit for
unlawful pretrial punishment under Article 13, Uniform Code of Military Justice
(UCMJ).

4. Defense counsel respectfully request the Govemment preserve the video and provide
a copy to the defense

5. A copy of this request was served on Trial Counsel by email on 19 January 20] I .



VID EDWARD COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

29594

UNITED STATES
DEFENSE DISCOVERY
REQUEST

U.S. Army.

Headquarters and eadquarters Company. U.S.
Army Garrison. Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall.
Fort Myer. VA 2221]









MANNING, Bradley E.. PFC





DATED: 16 February 201


1. In accordance with the Rules for Courts-Martial and the Military Rules of Evidence,
Manual for Courts-Martial. United States. 2008. Article 46. Uniform Code of Military
Justice, and other applicable law, request for supplemental discovery is hereby made for
the charged offenses in the case of United States v. Bradley E. Manning.

2. The defense requests that the government respond to each item listed in its previous
discover_v requests on October. l5 November, 8 December 20l0. and 10 January 201
and to also respond to the following additional discovery:

a) The defense team has learned that a number of soldiers at Fort Drum have received a
DOD imposed flag as a result ofinvestigations into the alleged leak by PFC Manning.
The defense requests the names of the soldiers who have been flagged. the nature for why
they were ?agged. who imposed the ?ag. and any other derogatory information relating to
this case to include. but not limited to: any reprimand (oral or written). UCMJ action. or
administrative separation actions.

b) The defense team has learned that Army CID has audio surveillance of the first
visitation booth immediately adjacent to the control room where we meet with PF
Manning. This appears to be the booth where attomey-client visits take place. The
defense requests a copy of any and all audio or video tapes of PFC Manning at any time
whether they be from in person visits or from telephonic conversations.

C) A copy of the latest CID investigation report and all Agents Investigation Reports
maintained under CID Regulation 195-! not previously provided to the defense.
Additionally, a copy of all agent notes. other govemmental investigative reports. and
swom statements.

d) A roster of all individuals assigned to HllC. ZBCT, lO"? Division, specifically?
any soldier assigned in the S2 Section of ZBCT. The defense requests full name. rank.
email and phone contact information for each individual.

e) Access to all classi?ed information that the government intends to use in this case.
To include any damage assessment or information review conducted by any
governmental agency or at the direction ofa govemmental agency.

29595

Defense Discovery Request PFC Bradley E. Manning

3. The defense requests that the government inform the defense counsel if it does not
intend to comply with any speci?c provision ofthis request.

4. It is understood that this is a continuing request.

5. A copy ofthis request was served on Trial Counsel by e-mail on 16 February 201 1.


I

-

.-
DAVID EDWARD COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

29596

25 July 2011

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, Joint Base Myer Henderson Hall. 204 Lee Avenue, Fort
Myer, VA 22211-1199

SUBJECT: Government Request for Delay of Article 32 Investigation - United States vs. PFC
Bradley E. Manning

1. On 25 July 2011. the Government requested that you again delay restarting the Article 32
Investigation until it has received consent from all of the Original Classi?cation Authorities
(OCAs) to release discoverable classi?ed evidence and information to the defense. Although
classi?cation reviews typically take time to complete. the Government has now had over a year
to do so. The latest request by the trial counsel for excludable delay does not adequately explain
what has been done to require timely response and reviews by the relevant OCAS.

2. Given the fact PFC Manning is currently in pretrial con?nement. the Government must
demonstrate due diligence in securing classi?cation reviews. On 9 January 2011. the Defense
made a request for speedy trial. The Defense once again renews this request. United States v.
Thompson. 68 MJ. 308 (C .A.A.F. 2009)(holding that Article 10. UCMJ, creates a more exacting
speedy trial demand than does the Sixth Amendment).

3. The Defense also renews its request for you to order the Government to provide either a
substitute for or a summary of the infonnation for the relevant classi?ed documents; to allow the
Defense to inspect any and all unclassi?ed documents. tangible items, and reports within the
Govemment?s control; to provide discovery to the Defense either previously denied or not
provided; AND to provide access to all CID and other law enforcement agents who have worked
on this case. Rule for Court?Martial (R.C.M.) and 701(a).

4. Any additional delay should not be excluded under R.C.M. 707(c). Instead. the requested
delay should be credited to the Government.

5. The point of contact for this memorandum is the undersigned at (800) 588-4156.

1

I



i/
vn) EDWARD MBS

Civilian Defense Counsel

29597

3 August 2011

MEMORANDUM THRU Staff Judge Advocate. Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, US Army
Military District of Washington. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington D.C. 30219

FOR Commander, US Army Garrison. Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall. Fort Myer. Virginia
22211

SUBJECT: Request for Appointment of Dr. Thomas A. Crrieger to Assist the Defense in the
Case of United States v. Manning

1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 46 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and Rule for
Court-Martial (R.C.M.) 703(d), the defense requests the appointment of Dr. Thomas A. Grieger
to replace Capt. Kevin D. Moore and assist the defense in the above-styled case. See attached
curriculum vitae. The defense further requests that Dr. Grieger be designated as a member of the
defense team under Military Rule of Evidence M.R.E. S02, and United States v. Toledo, 25 M.J.
270 (CMA 1987).

2. On 2 August 2011, the defense received an email from Capt. Moore indicating that he could
no longer perform his duties as the defense forensic See attached email. Capt.
Moore informed the defense that his current clinical schedule did not provide him with adequate
time to assist the defense. Additionally. Capt. Moore stated that due to PFC Manning?s assigned
location at the Joint Regional Correctional Facility at Fort Leavenworth. he no longer believed
that he was suited to ful?ll the role of the defense expert.

3. This is the second time that the defense has had to request for a replacement forensic
due to the assigned time commitments and conflicts with other military
duties. Previously. the defense was given COL David Benedick. COL Benediek also cited
military commitments as the basis for why he could not adequately assist the defense team. In
light of this persistent problem. the Defense requests the appointment of a civilian forensic


4. The defense requests that you appoint the following expert:

Dr. Thomas A. Grieger, M.D.. DFAPA Captain (retired Medical Co 5. United States Navy,
7617 Virginia Lane. Falls Church. VA 22043,

5. Dr. Grieger?s fees are $330.00 per hour for consultation as de?ned in paragraph
one of his fee schedule. See attached fee schedule. The fee for all travel is based upon whether
travel is required outside of a hundred mile radius of Washington D.C. or not. If within this
radius, it is $450.00 per hour for a maximum of $4,500 per day. If outside of this radius. it is
$4,500 per day. There is no fee for testimony time. only for the associated travel time and any
expenses incurred. Likewise. there is no fee for expenses for airfare, car rental, lodging and per
diem as those fees are included in the rate detailed above. The estimated total fee for Dr.
Grieger?s assistance in this case is $48.550.00. 1-lis hourly rate and fees comport with the Expert
Witness Rate Schedule for the Department of Justice.

SUBJECT: Request for Appointment of Dr. Thomas A. Grieger to Assist the Defense in the
Case of United States v. Manning

6. The POC is the undersigned at (800) 588-4156 or by e?mail at



DAVID E. COOMBS
Civilian Defense Counsel

29598



29599

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
unrreo STATES ARMY TRIAL DEFENSE SERVICE
FORT MEADE FIELD OFFICE
FORT MEADE. MARYLAND 20755



REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:

AFZD-TD 6 August 2011



MEMORANDUM THRU Staff Judge Advocate, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Army
Military District of Washington, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, D.C. 203 I 9

FOR Commander, U.S. Army Military District of Washington, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington,
D.C. 20319

SUBJECT: Request for computer hardware and software for necessary computer forensics work,
matter of United States PFC Bradley Manning.

1. On July 23, 2010, MG Terry A. Wolff, the original convening authority in the matter of US v.
PFC Brat?ey Manning, approved the appointment of Mr. Eric Lakes to be part of the Defense Team
as a computer forensics expert and set the funding for Mr. Lakes? services at $5,600.00. (See
attachment dated 23 July 2010). On 6 July 2011, the Defense requested additionally ?mding for Mr.
Lakes? services and clari?ed that the Defense?s computer forensics expert assistant for the case at
hand was Cyber Agents, Inc. and its employees, not solely Mr. Lakes, the owner of Cyber Agents,
Inc. (See attachment dated 6 July 201 1). The purpose of this memorandum is to request that the
Government provide the Defense with the necessary computer hardware and software products for
Cyber Agents, Inc. to do the computer forensics analysis.

2. Cyber Agents, Inc. needs the following hardware and software equipment to properly do the
computer forensics to assist PFC Manning in his defense: (Note 1: these hardware and software
needs can be purchased at an estimated cost of $1,256.00 and are further described, including vendor,
etc., in the attachment titled Hardware and Software, US v. Manning. Note 2: CAGE Code for Cyber

Agents, Inc. is

Two Samsung SpinPoint MP4 HMSOOJJ hard drives, 500GB, SATA 300;
Two NetAnalysis V1.52/HstEx v3 (Non-Dongle Version);

Two Vmware Works'tations7;

Two Snagit licenses;

Two Live View Government Version;

Two Mount Image Pro

Two Microsoft Office 2010;

Two Adobe Acrobat Pro

3. The Defense respectively requests that the Government provide the hardware and software
equipment outlined in number 2 above (equipment that is further described in the attachment titled
Hardware and Software US v. Manning) to the Defense and/or Cyber Agents, Inc. in order for Cyber
Agents, Inc. to conduct the necessary computer forensics. The basis and justi?cation for this request

is as follows:

a. The matter of US v. Manning involves some 8 terabytes of computer data, and a proper
defense cannot be rendered without proper computer forensics analysis;



29600

SUBJECT: Request for computer hardware and software, matter of United States v. PFC Bradley
Manning.

b. Without the aforementioned computer hardware and software, Cyber Agents, Inc. will
not be able to do the necessary computer forensics analysis;

c. The accused is entitled to a proper defense, and computer forensics analysis is vital to a
proper defense;

d. Should the Government have to purchase the aforementioned equipment and software,
such equipment and so?ware costs estimated at some $1,300.00 are not prohibitive;

e. The aforementioned equipment and software are indeed necessary, and they are readily
available on the commercial market.

lmportantly, Mr. Lakes and his company, Cyber Agents, Inc., are properly equipped at
their facility in Lexington, Kentucky, to conduct computer forensics, but given that some
of the computer data in US v. Manning is classi?ed as opposed to unclassi?ed data, the
Government has made it clear to the Defense and to Cyber Agents, that the
computer forensics will be conducted in a properly secured and approved facility using
approved and secured equipment and software. It is this reason that constitutes the
necessity for this equipment and so?ware request because of the classi?ed nature of
some of the data in question, Cyber Agents, Inc. carmot use some its own equipment and

PAUL R. BOUCHARD
CPT, JA
Defense Counsel







DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
UNITED STATES ARMY mm DEFENSE sERvzcE
4217 ROBERTS AVENUE. SUITE 5030
FORT MEADE. MARYLAND 20755

REPLY TO
OF

9 August 20] I

MEMORANDU Tl Trial Counsel

FOR Commander, Army Garrison, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, 204 Lee Avenue, Fort
Myer, VA 222! I-l l99

SUBJECT: Request for Computer Forensics Experts to Assist the Defense in United SIat?e.s* PFC
Bradley Manning.

. PFC Bradley Manning, the accused, by and through counsel, respectfully requests the
employment of Eric Lakes and Trent Struttmann as computer forensics experts in the matter of US v.
Manning. PFC Manning further requests that Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann be designated as
members ofthe Defense team under (IS. v. Toledo, 25 MJ. 270 (C.M.A. I987) and Military Rule of
Evidence 502.

2. Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann are co-owners Agents, Inc., a Lexington. Kentucky-based
computer forensics finn. Both individuals are well-qualified in the field ofcomputer forensics, and
have often been employed for courts-martial cases. Manning is entitled to a proper defense, and
computer forensics expertise is necessary for a proper defense.

3. Estimated Fees. Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann estimate their services will cost the Government
$14,000.00 excluding associated travel costs gasoline, hotel, food, etc.). This $l4,000.00 figure
is based on the following:

a. Mr. l.akes and Mr. Struttmann charge $l75.00 per hour per person for their services;

b. The Government has notified the Defense that the case of US v. Manning involves some
8 terabytes of data, and given that figure, Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann estimate they
can do the necessary computer forensics work in five days. (Note: 8 hours of work per
day at $175.00 per hour per person equates to $1,400.00 per day per person. $2,800.00
per day for two people (Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann) times five days equates to
$l4,000.00 for five days of work);

c. This $l4,000.00 estimated fee is also derived on the following:

l. That the computer forensics work will not take place at Mr. Lakes? and Mr.
Struttmanns? lab in Lexington, but rather, that it will take place in the
Washington, D.C. area in a properly secured facility;

2. That Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann will provide their own hardware needs except
for hard drives. (Note: It is the Defense?s understanding that it will be
recommended to the Government that the Government provide the necessary hard
drives);





29602

SUBJECT: Request for Computer Forensics Experts to Assist the Defense in United States v.
PFC Bradley Manning.

3. That Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann will provide the necessary Encase software,
but that other necessary software will be provided by the Government. (Note: It is
the Defense?s understanding that the following will be recommended to the
Government: l) that the Government provide the necessary software with the
exception of the Encase software and 2) that any licensed software that is
nontransferable will either be provided by the Government, or, should Mr. Lakes
and/or Mr. Struttmann need to purchase such so?ware, that the Government
reimburse Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann for such software purchases).

d. Signi?cance of Estimate. It is important to note that the estimated $l4,000.00 fee isjust
that an estimate. Given the sheer volume of data involved in the case of US v. Manning
(8 terabytes), and given the complexities and uncertainties that can take place in
computer forensics work, there is no exact way that a fee can be precisely pinpointed
experts can only estimate how long it will take them to do the necessary work.
Nonetheless, understanding the amount of data involved and other factors, Mr. Lakes and
Mr. Struttmann estimate they can complete the work in five days at a cost of $14,000.00
excluding travel costs. Should Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann need more than five days to
complete their work, such work will be billed at the rate of $175.00 per hour per person.

c. Note on Travel Costs. The estimated $14,000.00 fee does not include travel costs.
lmportantly, Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann have made it clear that they desire to drive to
the Washington, D.C. area to do their work instead of ?ying via commercial airfare.
Flying from Lexington, KY to Washington, D.C. can be expensive; having Mr. Lakes
and Mr. Struttmann drive to the Washington, D.C. area would actually save the
Government money.

4. Why Two Experts are Requested. Given the sheer volume of computer data involved in the case
of US v. Manning, and given past experiences of Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann, both individuals are
confident that two experts doing the computer forensics work is better, more efficient, and less time
consuming then having just one computer forensics expert do the work. Simply put, having two
computer forensics experts on the Defense team would actually save the Government money as
compared to havingjust one Defense computer forensics expert.

5. The following sections ofthis request further outline the basis and rationale explaining why the
Defense needs Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann as computer forensics experts. (Note: for more on Mr.
Lakes and Mr. Struttmann, to include their CVs, visit

6. Law. 846. Article 46 ofthe U.C.M.J. provides that Defense and Government should have equal
opportunity to obtain witnesses. In particular, a military accused has, as a matter of Equal Protection
and Due Process, a right to expert assistance when necessmy to present an adequate defense. US. v.
Garries, 22 MJ. 288 (C.M.A. US. v. Robinson, 39 MJ. 88 (C.M.A. I994), citing Britt v.
North Carolina, 404 U.S. 226 (I971) and Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 US. 68 (1985). Failure to employ
Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann would effectively deprive Manning ofhis ability to present a
defense in this case and would deny him "lm]eaningful access to justice." Ake v. Oklahoma, 470
US. 68 (I985). The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (formerly the Court of Military
Appeals) provided a three?pronged test for determining whether government-funded expert
assistance is necessary:



29603

Request for Computer Forensics Experts to Assist the Defense in United States v.
PFC Bradley Manning.

First, why the expert is needed? Second, whatwould the expert assistance accomplish for the
accused? Third, why is the defense counsel unable to gather and present the evidence that the
expert assistant would be able to develop?

United States v. Uonzrilez, 39 M.J. 459 (C.M.A. I994) (quoting US v. Allen, 3l 542, 623
(N.M.C.M.R. I990) aff"d, 33 209 (C.M.A. l99l)).



7. Why Expert Assistance is Needed.

a. This case unquestionably involves complex computer message traffic that requires expert
analysis and opinion. PFC Manning is charged with serious crimes. Without someone with an
expertise in computers and digital forensics, the Defense will not be able to completely understand,
evaluate, or prepare a defense to the Government?s case.

b. Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann are experts in computer forensics. They have been employed
before as Defense experts in courts-martial, and they possess numerous eenifications. (For more on
the qualilications of Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann visit viww.cyberagentsinc.com).

c. No member of the Defense is learned in the complex field of computer forensics, and none can
become so between the time of this request and the date of the Article 32 hearing and of the possible
trial.

8. What Would Expert Assistance Accomplish for the Accused.

a. Expert assistance would provide the Defense with the necessary understanding ofthe complex
computer message tra?icking involved in this case. Such understanding is not the province of lay
people. The experts? explanations are, therefore, critical for the Defense, the linder of fact, Military
Judge, and everyone involved in understanding the very essence of the case at hand.

b. Both Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann are highly regarded experts in the field of computer
forensics. They possess the requisite knowledge, experience, and expertise to fully analyze the
Governments evidence and to aid the Accused in the preparation ofan effective defense. Both Mr.
Lakes and Mr. Struttmann would embark on a full review of the evidence in the case to identify any
exculpatory information that may be contained in the Government's evidence, and to identify the
potential weaknesses in the Governments evidence.

9. Why the Defense ls Unable to Gather and Present this Evidence.

a. No member of the Defense team is trained or otherwise knowledgeable in the complex ?eld of
digital forensics. Denying the Accused of this fundamental right to present an adequate and
knowledgeable defense would amount to a violation of his Constitutional rights.

b. The requested experts will be advised that they are members of the Defense team and are, as
such, obligated to keep all matters concerning the ease con?dential pursuant to the attorney-client
privilege, subject of course to those exceptions should they become a defense witness.

IO. For the aforementioned reasons, failure to provide the requested assistance will result in a
fundamentally unfair trial. Clearly, this case meets the necessary elements ofthe Gonzalez case set
forth by our highest court, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The requested experts should
thus be appointed to the Defense team as a matter oflaw.

29604

SUBJECT: Request for Computer Forensics Experts to Assist the Defense in United States v.
PFC Bradley Manning.

1 1. POC is the undersigned at



?/414

PAUL R. BOUCHARD
CPT, JA
Defense Counsel





29605

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
JOINT BASE MYEFI-HENDERSON HALL
204 LEE AVENUE

- FOFIT MYEFI, 22211-1199
. REPLY TO
ATTENTION or

IMND-MHH-ZA l5/M3.

MEMORANDUM FOR Mr. David E. Coombs, Civilian Defense Counsel

SUBJECT: Appointment of Defense Computer Forensics Expert Consultants United States v.
PFC Bradley Manning

I reviewed the request for appointment of Mr. Eric Lakes and Mr. Trent Struttmann as computer
forensic expert consultants for the defense in the above-named case. After careful consideration,
the defense request is:

approved. 1 appoint Mr. Eric Lakes and Mr. Trent Struttmann as computer forensic
expertconsultants for the defense in the above-named case. I further direct that Mr. Lakes and
Mr. Sruttmann be designated members of the defense team under U.S. v. Toledo, 25 M.J. 270
(C.M.A. 1987) and Military Rule of Evidence 502. I authorize the expenditure of up to
for computer forensic consultation. Any expenditure of funds in excess of
will be disapproved, unless the additional amount is approved by me, in advance,
through a separate written request and written approval. Additionally, reasonable travel
reimbursement and per diem, IAW the JFTR, is authorized.

disapproved. You are free to renew your request with me, and similarly, if 1 forward
this case, you may renew your request with the GCMCA.

CARL R. COFFMAN, JR.
COL, AV
Commanding



29606

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
JOINT BASE MYER-HENDERSON HALL
204 LEE AVENUE

FOFIT MYEFI. VIRGINIA 22211-1199
REPLY To
ATTENTION or

IMND-MHH-ZA lib? Aw,


MEMORANDUM FOR Mr. David E. Coombs, Civilian Defense Counsel

SUBJECT: Appointment of Defense Expert Consultant in Forensic United States v.
PFC Bradley Manning

I reviewed your request for appointment of an expert consultant in forensic for the
defense to replace CAPT Kevin D. Moore in the above-named case. After careful consideration
of your enclosed request and the enclosed email, dated 4 August 2()11, the defense request is:

approved. I appoint Dr. Thomas A. Grieger as an expert consultant in the above-
named case to replace CAPT Moore. I further direct that Dr. Grieger be designated a member of
the defense team under US. v. Toledo, 25 M.J. 270 (C.M.A. 1987) and Military Rule of
Evidence I authorize the expenditure of up to for consultation. Any
expenditure of funds in excess of will be disapproved, unless the additional amount
is approved by me, in advance, through a separate written request and written approval.

disapproved, in part. I appoint LCDR David L. Moulton as an expert consultant in
the above-named case to replace CAPT Moore. I further direct that LCDR Moulton be
designated a member of the defense team under 11.8. v. Toledo, 25 M.J. 270 (C.M.A. 1987) and
Military Rule of Evidence 502. LCDR Moulton is an adequate substitute for Dr. Grieger and is
provided at no expense to the government, beyond mileage reimbursement, if authorized.

disapproved. CAPT Moore will remain the defense expert consultant.
CARL R. COFFMAN, JR.
as COL, AV

Commanding

29607



70: Em.

CC: QESE EM.A

SJA

Subject: RE: us v. PFC BM (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Thusday, August 04, 2011 5:03:26 PM

CPT Fein,

On August 28, I am slated to go work as a forensic psydiiatrist in the Forensic Psydiiatry Service of the
new Walter Reed Military Medical Center (COL Malone will be my boss). My PCS date is July 2013. Just
today, I corresponded with my specialty advisor, who stated that she does not anticipate that I will be
deployed in the next year as I have already deployed twice and there are several people ahead of me
on the deployment list who have never deployed. I do not see any con?icts with me giving the
appropriate attention to this case, to include even regular travel to Fort Levenworth to evaluate the
client.

v/r.
LCDR Moulton



From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:15 PM

To: Moulton, David L. LCDR NNMC

Cc: Morrow JoDean, CPT USA D.L. Moulton, Ford, Arthur D. WO1 USA JFHQ-
SJA

Subject: US v. PFC BM (UNCLASSIFIED)

Sir,

Thank you for your interest in being a possible defense expert witness in forensic Please see
attached request and let us know whether you are quali?ed and whether you will be available for the
next 12 - 15 months.

Please take into account any possible deployments or other taskers that might make you unavailable
and understand this appointment will likely require you to travel to Fort Leavenworth, KS.

Thank you.

v/
CPT Fein

29608

DAVID L. MOULTON, MD

CDR(sel) MC USN
National Naval Medical Center
8901 Rockvillc Pike
Bethesda, MD 20889

Education
B.A. Humanities

Brigham Young University, Provo, UT I996
M.D. Doctorate of Medicine

Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 2000
Internship

National Capital Consortium, Bethesda, MD 200]
Residency

National Capital Consortium, Bethesda, MD 2004
Fellowship Forensic

National Capital Consortium, Bethesda, MD 20l0

Professional Achievements

Associate Program Director, National Capital Consortium Residency Program, Bethesda,
MD, July 2010 to present; September 2008-June 2009. This program provides comprehensive
Graduate Medical Education in a large training program of 44 residents. Speci?c
responsibilities involved direct oversight of training at the National Naval Medical Center, as well as
advisor to the Program Director on diverse matters pertaining to the operation of the Residency.

Clinical Chief Inpatient Service, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, October
2007-April 2009. This is a 12-bed adult inpatient facility providing full-spectrum acute inpatient
services to active-duty service members and their dependants. Supervisory role for two Licensed
Clinical Social Workers. Supervisory role over Residents, lntems and Medical Students
rotating on the service.

Clinical Chief Combat Stress Control, I 13"? Medical Company, Taji, Iraq, March 2007-July 2007,
and the 785"? Medical Company July 2007-Sept 2007. One of two on FOB Taji, which
supported ?ve Combat Brigades and over 20,000 Soldiers.

Department Head, Naval Hospital Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, NC Aug 2004-January 2005;
September 2005-February 2007. Department Head over Inpatient Services, a 20-bed adult
inpatient facility providing full-spectrum acute inpatient services to active-duty service members and
their dependants. This included supervisory responsibility of 20 staff members.

Department Head, CLB-2, 2D SSG (MLG) Operational Stress Center, Al Asad, Iraq, February 2005-
September 2005, providing mental health services to deployed Marine, Army, Navy and Air Force
Service Members who honorably serve our country in Operation Iraqi Freedom.

29609

Academic Appointments

Assistant Professor of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda,
MD. Appointed July 25, 2011.

Special Qualifications
Fleet Marine Force Qualified Of?cer, February, 2005.
Navy Pistol Quali?cation (E)

Personal and Unit Awards

Meritorious Service Medal

Navy Commendation Medal (x2)
Army Commendation Medal
Navy Achievement Medal

Army Achievement Medal (x2)
Presidential Unit Citation
Meritorious Unit Citation (x2)
Iraq Campaign Ribbon (x2)

Recognitions and Commendations

Patient Safety Award of Excellence, National Naval Medical Center, Aug 2008
Letter of Commendation, Naval Health Clinic Quantico, March 2008

Invited Presentations

Sex Offenders and Issues in Sexual Assault. Presented to the Naval Justice School,
Newport, RI, April 2010.
PTSD in the Court Room. Presented to the Naval Justice School, Newport, RI, May 2011.

Board Certi?cations

General American Board of and Neurology, Certi?ed June 7, 2006.
Forensic American Board of and Neurology, Certi?ed June 7, 201 1.

State Medical Board Licensures

Maryland Board of Physicians, License No: D0069601
Virginia Board of Medicine, License No: 0101232547
North Carolina Medical Board, License No: 20040121 (inactive)

29610

Court Consultant Expert Witness Military Courts Martial

Federal Felony Cases

U.S. v. Ramzi bin al Shibh, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, June 2011; (9/11 Terror Suspect)
U.S. v. Clark, Baumholder, Germany, April 201 12* (Negligent Homicide, 3 counts)

U.S. v. McA??rey, Fort Bragg, NC, December 20102 (Attempted Murder, PTSD Mitigation)
U.S. v. Law, MCB Camp Lej eune, November 20101 (Premeditated Murder)

U.S. v. Chamberlain, MCB Quantico, September 20102 (Assault)

U.S. V. Afa, Baumholder, Germany, August 20102 (Sexual Assault)

U.S. V. Sobenes, Pensacola, FL, March 20l01* (Sexual Assault)

Chastain v. U.S. Navy, MCB Camp Lejeune, January 20101 (Hostile Work Environment)
Kirk v. U.S. Navy, MCB Camp Lejeune, January 20101 (Hostile Work Environment)

U.S. v. Walker, Baumholder, Germany, February 20102* (Sexual Assault)

Maryland v. Mary Koontz, Baltimore County, MD, January 2010l* (First Degree Murder)
U.S. v. Schwartz, Fort Myer, November 20092* (Conspiracy to Commit Murder)

U.S. v. Hall, MCB Quantico, VA, May 20092* (Illicit Substance Use, PTSD Mitigation)

1 Government Consultant
2 Defense Consultant
Indicates Expert Testimony Provided in Addition to Consultation



29611

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
JOINT BASE MYEFI-HENDERSON HALL
204 LEE AVENUE

I. FORT 22211-1199
REPLY TO
ATTENTION or



IMND-MHH-ZA

MEMORANDUM FOR Mr. David E. Coombs, Civilian Defense Counsel
SUBJECT: Defense Request for Computer Hardware and Software United States v. PFC
Bradley Manning

1. 1 reviewed the request for computer hardware and software to assist appointed computer
forensic expert consultants in the above-named case and your request is:

(W) approved. I authorize for the purchase of the below requested equipment
and software:

a. x2 hard drive.

b. x2 NetAnalysis v1.52/HstEx v3 (Non-Dongle Version) Software.
c. x2 Vmware Workstation 7 Software.

d. x2 Snagit License.

disapproved. You are free to renew your request with me, and similarly, if I forward
this case, you may renew your request with the GCMCA.

2. The United States will provide the following items:
a. x2 Live View (Government Version) Software.
b. x2 Mount lmage Pro v4 Software.
c. x2 Microsoft Of?ce 2007 Software.

d. x2 Adobe Acrobat Pro 9 Software.

CARL R. COFFMAN, JR.
COL, AV
Commanding





29612

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
umreo sures ARMY TRIAL oerense ATLANTIC
roar um-:n new ornce
roar men. VIRGINIA 22211

REPLY TO
AT TENHON OF:

ANJA-TDS 20 September 201 1

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, 204 Lee Avenue, Fort
Myer, Virginia 222 I I-1 l99

SUBJECT: Request for Courier Cards

l. I am requesting your assistance with issuing CONUSISECRET courier cards to designated
members of the defense team representing PFC Bradley Manning. For the reasons below, we are
requesting courier cards from the government as soon as possible.

2. There is an immediate legitimate need for the defense team to transport classified evidence.
The government delivered three classified laptops and four compact discs containing classi?ed
data to my of?ce yesterday. Defense team members need courier cards to allow us to transport
the laptops and computers to other locations where our defense experts can use them to prepare
for the case. In addition, we will need courier cards to travel between the TDS offices, and
eventually to the trial which is expected to take place at Fort Meade.

3. Cards are required for the following defense members:

MAJ Matthew Kemkes, Fort Myer TDS
CPT Paul Bouchard. Fort Meade TDS
CPT Josh Tooman, Fort Leavenworth TDS
CW2 Melissa Santiago, Fort Myer TDS
SSG Cherise Purcell, Fort Myer TDS

09?39?

. Thank you

4 You may contact me a
for your consideration of my request.

mzf?

MATTHEW
MAJ JA
Senior Defense Counsel

l. The above request is (approved) (-disapproved)

2. If approved, each command security manager will issue a DD Form 2501, with an authorized
level up to to each member ofthe defense listed above. lftravel must occur outside
ofthe local geographic limit, then an additional courier authorization letter will be issued for
each individual per trip. Prior to utilizing a courier card or authorization, each member ofthe
defense listed above, must received courier training from a defense security expert.



28 SEP 2011 CARL R.
COL, AV
Commanding





DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
UNITED STATES ARMY TRIAL DEFENSE SERVICE
4217 Roberts Avenue. Suite 5030
FORT GEORGE MEADE. MARYLAND 20755

TO
ATTENTION OF

23 November 20! i

THRU Staffiudgc Advocate, Office ofthe Staffludge Advocate. U.S. Army
Military l)istrict ofwashington. Fort Lesley]. McNair, Washington. DC. 20319

FOR Commander. U.S. Army Military District ofwashington, Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington,
D.C. 20319

SUBJECT: Request for computer software for necessary computer forensics work. matter of United
tr Mamwmg.

1. Eric Lakes and 'l'rent Struttmann are defense expert assistants in the area of computer forensics in
the matter of .S?m1e.s' v. PFC'Brml1cy Manning. As members of the Defense team. Mr. Lakes
and Mr. Struttmann request the following computer software to properly conduct their necessary
computer forensics work:

Chrome Analysis Plus;
b. Internet Evidence Finder.
2. Justilication. There is an immediate legitimatejustilication for these software products.

a. Chrome Analysis Plus is necessary because:

1. Using Chrome Analysis Plus would bring about signi?cant time savings to M5. Lalges
and Mr. Struttmann and thereby save the Government great expense. By using Chrome
Analysis Plus, Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann wouldn?t need to individually figure out
search terms necessary to recover Chrome artifacts i.e. by using Chrome Analysis, the
search terms would automatically be there and figured out. Mr. Lakes and Mr.
Struttmann estimate. conservatively, that using Chrome Analysis would save one-third of
their time searching for Chrome artifacts. importantly, Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann
charge $175.00 per hour ($350.00 per hour for the two of them) for their services.

2. The Chrome Analysis license key is for a single use; it is licensed for one
computer. As a one-time cost and one-time use, Chrome Analysis is unique to the US v.
Mcmm'ng case Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann would not be able to use Chrome
Analysis on their other cases.

3. The accused. PFC Manning. allegedly used a Chrome browser at some p_qint, and

Chrome Analysis Plus is the best and most eflicicntsoftware to properly do computer
forensics involving a Chrome browser.

4. Chrome Analysis costs roughly $75.00, and is readily available for purchase.





29614

Request for computer hardware and software, matter of United States v. PFC Bradley
Manning.

b. Internet Evidence l-?indcr is necessary because:

I. l.ike analysis, it would enable Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann to retrieve
certain artifacts Quickly and g?jcigmly thereby saving the Government mom;

Without Internet Evidence liinder. Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttman would have to
design certain search terms a time-consuming and therefore expensive task. Mr.
Lakes and Mr. Struttmann conservatively estimate that using Evidence
Finder would safe them 25-to-40 percent of their time.

2. It is used to recover chat messages regardless of the platfonn used. Whether
I-'accbook or Yahoo chat messages or Myspace was allegedly used. Evidence
Finder can retrieve such chats. The case of Umied States v. Bradley .lf?mnmg
involves many alleged chats.

3. Though Internet Evidence Finder does not have a single-use license key - i.e. it is not

individually licensed for one machine. the Defense would be willing to borrow the
Government lnternct Evidence Finder from (United States Army

Criminal lnvestigative Lab) and return such after the completion ofthe
Defense's computer forensic work.

3. Though Chrome Analysis and Internet Evidence liinder are not absolutely necessary for the
Defense?s Computer Forensics Team - Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann could perform their forensic
work without these software products it is without question that these software tools would clearly
bring about significant efficiency gains, time savings. and cost benefits to not only the Defense but
also to the Government. Having the computer forensics work done more efficiently and at lower
costs is in the Government's interests. Moreover, both software products are readily available.
Simply put. the clear justification for these software products trumps the fact that it is possible for
Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann to do the work without Chrome Analysis Plus and Internet Evidence
I-?inder. Indeed, time savings -are important to the Defense. and efficiency and cost savings are a
legitimate Government interest.

4. For the reasons outlined in this request, the Defense respectfully requests the software products
Chrome Analysis Plus and Internet Evidence Finder.

5. roe is the undersigncd l.

PAUL R. BOLCHARD
CPT, JA
Defense Counsel





29615

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMV
JOINT BASE IIYEH-HENDERSON HALL
204 LEE AVENUE
FORT MYEH. VIRGINIA 2221 1-1 199

DEC Z-all

MEMORANDUM FOR CPT Paul Bouchard, Defense Counsel

SUBJECT: Defense Request for Computer Software - United States v. PFC Bradley Manning

1. I reviewed the enclosed request for computer software to assist your computer forensic expert
consultants in the above-named case. You assert that there is an ?immediate legitimate
justification" for the listed software products and by authorizing their purchase your experts

would save a signi?cant amount of time and save this command ?great expense.?

2. Based on your assertion that these purchases will ?bring about significant time savings? for
your experts consultants to conduct their forensic analysis, your request is:

approved. I authorize no more than $1,000.00 for the purchase of the below
requested equipment and software:

a. Chrome Analysis Plus.
b. lntemet Evidence Finder.

disapproved. You are free to renew your request with me, and similarly, if I forward
this case, you may renew your request with the GCMCA.

2 Encls CARL R. COFFMAN. JR.
1. Defense Request, 28 Nov 1] COL, AV
2. Internet Evidence Finder Quote Commanding



29616

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
UNITED STATES ARMY TRIAL DEFENSE SERVICE
4217 Roberts Avenue. Suite 5030
FORT GEORGE MEADE. MARYLAND 20755



TO
AT OF

28 November 201

MEMORANDUM THRU Stafl'.ludge Advocate, OlTce ofthe Staff Judge Advocate. U.S. Army
Military District ol'Washington. Fort Lesley J. McNair. Washington. D.C. 20319

FOR Commander. U.S. Army Military District of Washington, Fort Lesley J- McNair. Washington,
D.C. 20319

SUBJECT: Request for computer software for necessary computer forensics work, matter of United

Manning.

l. Eric Lakes and 'l'rent Struttmann arc defense expert assistants in the area of computer forensics in
the matter of .S'lule.t' v. PFC Bradley Manning. As members ofthe Defense team. Mr. Lakes
and Mr. Struttmann request the following computer software to properly conduct their necessary
computer forensics work:

a. Chrome Analysis Plus;
b. lnternet Evidence Finder.

2. Justil'icati_gn. There is an immediate legitimate justification for these software products.
a. Chrome Analysis Plus is necessary ?because:

3- sin Anal sis Plus would rin about si nil." ant time savings to Mr. Lakes
and Mr. Struttmann and thereby save the Government -great By using ?Chrome
Analysis Plus, Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann wouldn't need to individually ?gure out
search terms necessary to recover Chrome artifacts i.e. by using Chrome Analysis, the
search terms would automatically be there and figured out. Mr. Lakes and Mr.
Struttmann estimate. conservatively, that using Chrome Analysis would save one-third of
their time searching for Chrome artifacts. importantly, Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann
charge $175.00 per hour ($350.00 per hour for the two of them) for their services.



2. The Chrome Analysislicense key is for a single usg; it is licensed for one

computer. As a one-time cost and one-time use, Chrome Analysis is unique to the US v.
Manning case Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann would notbe able to use Chrome
Analysis on their other cases.

3. 'l'he accused. PFC Manning, allegedly used a Chrome browser at some point, and

Chrome Analysis Plus is the best and most efficient software to properly do computer
forensics involving a Chrome browser.

4. Chrome Analysis costs roughly ?75.00. and is readily available for purchase.



29617

SUBJECT: Request for computer hardware and software. matterof United States v. PFC Bradley
Manning.

b. lntemet Evidence Finder is necessary because:

I. l.ike Chrome Aggmig, it would enable Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann to retrieve
certain artifacts ggigkly and ggving the Government money?

without Internet Evidence I-?inder. Mr. lakes and Mr. Struttman would haveto
design certain search terms a time-consuming and therefore expensive task. Mr.
Lakes and Mr. Struttmann conservatively estimate that using lntemet Evidence
Finder would safe them 25-to-40 percent of their time.

2. It is used 15; g_e_?regardless of the Qlg?gnn Whether

liaccbook or Yahoo chat messages or MySpace- was allegedly used. Internet Evidence
Finder can retrieve such chats. The case of UniledSra1es v. PFC Bradley Manning
involves many alleged chats.

3. Though lntemet Evidence Finder does not have a single-use license key i.e. it is not

individually licensed for one machine, the Defense; would be willing to borrow the
(iovemmegt Internet Evidence Finder from USACIL (United States Army

Criminal investigative Lab) and return such after the completion 0 the
Defense?s computer forensic work.

3. Though Chrome Analysis and lntemet Evidence Finder are not absolutely necessary for the
Defense's Computer Forensics Team - Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann could perform their forensic
work without these software products it is without question that these software tools would clearly
bring about signi?cant efliciency gains, time savings, and cost benefits to not only the Defense but
also to the Government. Having the computer forensics work done more efficiently and at lower
costs is in the Government's interests. Moreover, both software products are readily available.
Simply put. the clear justification for these software products trumps the fact that it is possible for
Mr. Lakes and Mr. Struttmann to do the work without Chrome Analysis Plus and lnternet Evidence
l-?inder. lndeed, time savings are important to the Defense, and efficiency and cost savings are a
legitimate Government interest.

4. For the reasons outlined in this request. the Defense respectfully requests the software products

Chrome Analysis Plus and lntemet l-Evidence Finder.

PAUL R. BOUCHARD
CPT, JA
Defense Counsel

5. POC is the undersigned at

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

29618



v. Prosecution Response to
Defense Motion to Dismiss
Manning, Bradley E. for Lack of Speedy Trial
PFC, U.S. Army,
HHC, U.S. Army Garrison, Enclosure 81 (Defense Counsel Emails)
Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall
Fort Myer, Virginia 22211 16 November 2012
Previously
Email Number DATE TIME Submitted
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0001 1-Aug-10 19:54:00
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_0002 1-Aug-10 19:54:34
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0003 2-Aug-10 09:48:13
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0004 3-Aug-10 11:06:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0005 3-Aug-10 11:07:49
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0006 3-Aug-10 11:08:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0007 3-Aug-10 11:37:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0008 3-Aug-10 12:35:08
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0009 3-Aug?10 13:43:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0010 3?Aug-10 13:50:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0011 4-Aug-10 12:11:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0012 4-Aug-10 12:15:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_0013 4-Aug-10 14:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0014 4-Aug-10 18:11:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0015 5-Aug-10 14:24:25
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0016 5-Aug-10 19:49:30
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__0017 6?Aug?10 07:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0018 6-Aug-10 15:04:48
Defense_Unc|ass_Email__0019 6?Aug?10 17:30:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0020 7-Aug-10 09:37:20
Defense__Unc|ass_Email__O021 7-Aug-10 09:49:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0022 7-Aug?10 09:51:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0023 23-Aug-10 20:53:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0024 8-Aug-10 20:56:00
Defense_U nclass__Email_0025 9-Aug?10 14:25:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0026 9-Aug-10 14:27 :51
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0027 9-Aug-10 22:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0028 9-Aug-10 22:36:00
D_efense_Unc|ass_Email_0029 10-Aug-10 10:06:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0030 10-Aug-10 10:11:02
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_003 1 10-Aug-10 10:43 :22
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0032 10-Aug-10 10:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0033 10-Aug-10 10:59:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0034 10-Aug-10 13:09:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0035 10-Aug-10 22:19:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0036 11-Aug-10 09:27:41

Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0037 11-Aug-10 09:30:00
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_0038 11-Aug-10 09:33:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0039 11-Aug-10 13:08:15
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0040 12-Aug-10 20:11:00
Defense_Unc!ass_EmaiI_0041 12-Aug-10 20:12 :00
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_0042 13-Aug-10 16:56:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0043 13-Aug-10 17:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0044 13-Aug-10 17:05 :39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0045 23-Aug-10 07:24:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0046 23-Aug-10 14:54:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0047 23-Aug-10 15:27:40
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0048 24-Aug-10 08:45 :09
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0049 24-Aug-10 14:29:31
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0050 25-Aug-10 10:27:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_005 1 25-Aug-10 10:51:00
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_0052 25-Aug-10 10:51:18
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0053 25-Aug-10 10:53:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0054 25-Aug-10 10:54:48
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0055 26-Aug-10 07:06:24
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0056 26-Aug-10 07:25:24
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0057 26-Aug-10 08:33 :34
26-Aug-10 08:38:30
Defense_U nc|ass__Email_0059 26-Aug-10 09:19:18
Defense_U nc|ass__Email_0060 26-Aug-10 09:28:51
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0061 26-Aug-10 09:34:27
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0062 26-Aug-10 11:43 :42
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0063 26-Aug-10 11:55 :01
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0064 26-Aug-10 12:03:09
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0065 26-Aug-10 12:22:17
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0066 1-Sep-10 10:51:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0067 1-Se p-10 18:29:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0068 2-Sep-10 16:49:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0069 2-Sep-10 23:02 :07
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0070 2-Sep-10 23:02:25
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0071 2-Sep-10 23:02:58
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0072 3-Sep-10 08:19:18
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0073 6-Sep-10 23:47:00
Defense__Unclass_Emai|_0074 7-Sep-10 18:38:09
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0075 8-Sep-10 08:22 :50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0076 10-Sep-10 10:21:09
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0077 10-Se p-10 10:25:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0078 10-Sep-10 10:3 1:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0079 13-Sep-10 18: 18:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0080 15-Sep-10 13:36:23
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0081 17-Sep-10 18:51:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0082 18-Sep-10 14:43:50

2

29619



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0083 19-Sep-10 2 1: 16:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0084 19-Sep-10 21:19:44
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0085 19-Sep-10 21:21:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0086 19-Sep-10 21:22:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0087 20-Sep-10 16:02:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0088 24-Sep-10 14:30:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0089 24-Sep-10 15:21:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0090 24-Sep-10 15:46:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0091 28-Sep-10 19:16:12
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0092 29-Sep-10 09:56:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0093 29-Sep-10 12:26:3 1
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0094 29-Sep-10 12:31:13
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0095 6-Oct-10 14:23 :09
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0096 6-Oct-10 19:18:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Email__0097 7-Oct-10 12:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__0098 7-Oct-10 13:45:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0099 7-Oct-10 13:45:29
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0100 12-Oct-10 07:47 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0101 12-Oct-10 08:14:39
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0102 13-Oct-10 20:53:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0103 13-Oct-10 22:49:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0104 14-Oct-10 08:24:48
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0105 14-Oct-10 11:54:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0106 14-Oct-10 12:33:09
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_0107 14-Oct-10 12:41:08
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0108 14-Oct-10 17:59:33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0109 14-Oct-10 22:00:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0110 14-Oct-10 22:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0111 15-Oct-10 08:11:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0112 15-Oct-10 08:54:01
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0113 18-Oct-10 21:26:00
Defense_U 19-Oct-10 09:57:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0115 19-Oct-10 10:29:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|__0116 19-Oct-10 13:47:39
Defense_U nclass_Email_0117 19-Oct-10 23:21:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0118 20-Oct-10 14:52:50
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0119 20-Oct-10 15:39:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0120 21-Oct-10 08:50:02
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0121 21-Oct-10 09:24:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0122 21-Oct-10 09:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0123 21-Oct-10 09:27:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0124 21-Oct-10 09:28:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0125 21-Oct-10 .09:33:41
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0126 21-Oct-10 09:49:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0127 22-Oct-10 20:13:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0128 22-Oct-10 20:14:00

3

29620

Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0129 22-Oct-10 20:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0130 22-Oct-10 20:16:00
22-Oct-10 20:17:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0132 22-Oct-10 20:17:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0133 22-Oct-10 20: 17:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0134 22-Oct-10 20:17:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0135 22-Oct-10 20:17:00
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_0136 22-Oct-10 20:17:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__0137 22-Oct-10 20:17:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0138 22-Oct-10 20:17:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0139 22-Oct-10? 20:17:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0140 22-Oct-10 20:18:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0141 22-Oct-10 20:18:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0142 26-Oct-10 10:20:49
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0143 28-Oct-10 17:00:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0144 28-Oct-10 18:36:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0145 29-Oct-10 07:35:05
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0146 29-Oct-10 16:05:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0147 29-Oct-10 16:06:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0148 29-Oct-10 16:17:19
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0149 31-Oct-10 11:08:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0150 1?Nov-10 17:51:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0151 1?Nov-10 18:00:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0152 1?Nov-10 21:26:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0153 2-Nov-10 08:45:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0154 2-Nov-10 12:29:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0155 2-Nov-10 19:03 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0156 4-Nov-10 16:39:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0157 5-Nov-10 12:41:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0158 8-Nov-10 14:11:37
Defense_U nclass_Email_0159 8-Nov- 10 14:12:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0160 8-Nov-10 15:00:14
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0161 8-Nov-10 15:37:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0162 10-Nov-10 01:33:04
Defense_Unclass__EmaiI_0163 10-Nov-10 07:26:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0164 10-Nov-10 13:03:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0165 11-Nov-10 03:49:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0166 11-Nov-10 03:53:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0167 11-Nov-10 06:40:50
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0168 11-Nov-10 19:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0169 15-Nov-10 02:10:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0170 15-Nov-10 06:13:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0171 15-Nov-10 07:58:20
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0172 15-Nov-10 14:40:02
16-Nov-10 08:39:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0174 16-Nov-10 08:48:06

4

29621

Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0175 16-Nov-10 08:49:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0176 16-Nov-10 15:41:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0177 18-Nov-10 16: 17:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0178 19-Nov-10 02:37:28
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0179 19-Nov-10 07:47 :00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0180 19-Nov-10 07:51:14
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0181 19-Nov-10 09:23:39
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_0182 19-Nov-10 09:34:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0183 19-Nov-10 19:39:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0184 22-Nov-10 13:02 :3 1
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0185 22-Nov-10 13:20:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0186 22-Nov-10 13:41:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0187 22-Nov-10 15:59:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0188 22-Nov-10 16:06:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0189 29-Nov-10 13:40:30
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0190 29-Nov-10 18:26:26
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0191 29-Nov-10 19:21:43
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0192 30-Nov-10 12:30:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0193 30-Nov-10 12:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0194 30-Nov-10 12:41:23
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0195 30-Nov-10 12:49:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0196 30-Nov-10 13:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0197 30-Nov-10 13:21:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0198 30-Nov-10 13:33:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0199 1-Dec-10 07:47:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0200 1-Dec-10 07:49:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0201 1-Dec-10 08:57 :22
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0202 3-Dec-10 17:15 :59
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0203 3-Dec-10 18:00:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0204 8-Dec-10 11:51:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0205 8-Dec-10 13:53 :21
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0206 8-Dec-10 14:03:27
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0207 8-Dec-10 14:04:37
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|__0208 8-Dec-10 14:52:00
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_0209 8-Dec- 10 18:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0210 8-Dec- 10 19:16:44
Defense_UncIass_EmaiI_0211 9-Dec-10 23:49:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0212 10-Dec-10 15:34:47
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_02 13 12-Dec-10 22:59:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0214 15-Dec-10 09:35:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0215 15-Dec-10 10:42:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0216 15-Dec-10 15:35:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0217 16-Dec-10 09:37 :23
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0218 16-Dec-10 10:41:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0219 16-Dec-10 11:18:22
Defense_U nc|ass_E mai|_02 20 18-Dec-10 14:44:02

5

29622

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0221 18-Dec-10 14:52:52
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0222 18-Dec-10 14:56:29
Defense_U nclass_Emai!_0223 19-Dec-10 19:33:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_02 24 19-Dec-10 19:46:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0225 19-Dec-10 23:07:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_02 26 20-Dec-10 10:47:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0227 20-Dec-10 18:53 :00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0228 20-Dec-10 18:59:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0229 20-Dec-10 19:44:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0230 20-Dec- 10 19:53:27
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0231 20-Dec- 10 23:33:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0232 21-Dec-10 07:42 :08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0233 30-Dec-10 12:07:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0234 3-Jan-11 10:56:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0235 3-Jan-11 23:28:17
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0236 5-Jan-11 15:08:07
Defense_Unclass_Email_0237 5-Jan-11 15:15:43
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0238 5-Jan-11 22:55:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0239 5-Jan-11 23:35:24
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0240 9-Jan-11 16:39:13
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0241 9-Jan-11 19:01:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0242 10-Jan-11 22:37:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Email__0243 11-Jan-11 06:35:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0244 11-Jan-11 08:16:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0245 11-Jan-11 08:21:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0246 12-Jan-11 12:06:59
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0247 12-Jan-11 15:04:00
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiJ_0248 13-Jan-11 11:51:31
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0249 13-Jan-11 13:18:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0250 13-Jan-11 14:03:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0251 13-Jan-11 14:18:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0252 13-Jan-11 14:18:07
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0253 14-Jan-11 20:14:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0254 16-Jan-11 17:42:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0255 16-Jan-11 18:57:51
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0256 18-Jan-11 00:02:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0257 18-Jan-11 10:36:08
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0258 18-Jan-11 10:36:21
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0259 18-Jan-11 11:04:00
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_02 60 18-Jan-11 11:09:19
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0261 18-Jan-11 11:32:00
Defe nse_U nc|ass_EmaiJ_02 62 19-Jan-11 12:53 :54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0263 19-Jan-11 13:20:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0264 19-Jan-11 17:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0265 19-Jan-11 18:12:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0266 19-Jan-11 21:17:06

6

29623



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0267 20-Jan-11 12:21:27
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__0268 20-Jan-11 15:37 :00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0269 20-Jan-11 16:08:28
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0270 20-Jan-11 20:00:22
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0271 20-Jan-11 20:14:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0272 20-Jan-11 23:22:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0273 20-Jan-11 23:27:19
Defense_UncJass__Emai|_0274 21-Jan-11 11:13:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0275 21-Jan-11 11:18:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0276 21-Jan-11 13:37:49
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0277 21-Jan-11 13:40:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0278 21-Jan-11 17:29:42
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0279 21-Jan-11 20:37:00
Defense_U nciass__Emai|_0280 22-Jan-11 09:07 :18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0281 22-Jan-11 12:32:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0282 22-Jan-11 12:36:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0283 24-Jan-11 18:03:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0284 24-Jan-11 18:41:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0285 24-Jan-11 21:26:48
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0286 24-Jan-11 21:32:23
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0287 25-Jan-11 18:13:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0288 25-Jan-11 19:16:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0289 25-Jan-11 23:04:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0290 25-Jan-11 23:37:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0291 26-Jan-11 01:28:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0292 26-Jan-11 06:43 :08
Defense_U nclass_Email_0293 26-Jan-11 11:04:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0294 26-Jan-11 12:11:57
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0295 26-Jan-11 12:17:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0296 26-Jan-11 12:42:10
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0297 27-Jan-11 02:04:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0298 27-Jan-11 02:22:42
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0299 27-Jan-11 05:43 :19
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0300 27-Jan-11 06:28:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0301 27-Jan-11 07:07 :48
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0302 28-Jan-11 08:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Ema i|__0303 28-Jan-11 09:03:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0304 31-Jan-11 07:19:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0305 31-Jan-11 15:47:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0306 31-Jan-11 15:47:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0307 31-Jan-11 17:07:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__0308 3 1-Jan-11 22:03:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0309 3 1-Jan-11 22:38:26
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0310 1-Fe b-11 05:48:57
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__0311 1-Feb?11 06:38:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0312 1-Feb?11 06:44:50

7

29624



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0313 1-Feb-11 06:46:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0314 1-Feb-11 07:25:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0315 1-Feb-11 07:29:26
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0316 1-Feb-11 09:13:32
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0317 1-Feb-11 12:09:04
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0318 1-Feb-11 12:11:49
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0319 1-Feb-11 12:41:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0320 1-Feb-11 13:16:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0321 2-Feb-11 19:26:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0322 2-Feb-11 23:01:52
Defense_U nc|ass__Email_0323 2-Feb-11 23:04:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0324 2-Feb-11 23:11:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0325 3-Feb-11 19:41:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0326 3-Feb-11 19:49:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0327 4-Feb-11 01:43 :20
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0328 7-Feb-11 08:46:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0329 7-Feb-11 08:49:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0330 7-Feb-11 09:07:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0331 7-Feb-11 14:37:55
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__0332 9-Feb-11 06:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0333 9-Feb-11 06:49:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0334 9-Feb-11 07:51:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0335 11-Feb-11 06:43:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0336 11-Feb-11 06:49:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0337 14-Feb-11 08:03:19
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0338 14-Feb-11 08:13:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0339 14-Feb-11 08:44:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0340 14-Feb-11 16:11:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email__0341 15-Feb-11 10:54:44
Defense_UncIass_Emai|__0342 15-Feb-11 11:57:05
Defense_UncIass_Emai|__0343 15-Feb-11 14:09:43
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_0344 15-Feb-11 23:00:00
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_0345 15-Feb-11 23:07:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0346 16-Feb-11 08:07:19
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0347 16-Feb-11 13:07:21
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_0348 16-Feb-11 13:55:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0349 17-Feb-11 17:05:15
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_035O 17-Feb-11 17:15:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0351 18-Feb-11 11:43:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0352 18-Feb-11 15:03:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0353 18-Feb-11 15:05:00
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0354 18-Feb-11 16:31:19
Defense_U nc|ass__Email_0355 18-Feb-11 17:44:11
Defense_Unc|ass__EmaiI_O356 21-Feb-11 20:50:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0357 21-Feb-11 21:00:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0358 21-Feb-11 21:10:15

8

29625

Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0359 25-Feb-11 15:01:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0360 25-Feb-11 15:30:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0361 25-Feb-11 21:23:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0362 25-Feb-11 21:41:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0363 26-Feb-11 16:46:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0364 26-Feb-11 18:52:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0365 27-Feb-11 21:31:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0366 28-Feb-11 10:09:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0367 28-Feb-11 10:14:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0368 28-Feb-11 10:19:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0369 28-Feb-11 10:23:30
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0370 28-Feb-11 18:05:20
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0371 28-Feb-11 21:50:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0372 1-Mar-11 19:42:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0373 1-Mar-11 19:46:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0374 1-Mar-11 20:44:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0375 1-Mar-11 20:47:43
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0376 1-Mar-11 22:00:57
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0377 2-Mar-11 15:57:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0378 2-Mar-11 16:02:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0379 2-Mar-11 17:15:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0380 2-Mar-11 17:39:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0381 2-Mar-11 23:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0382 2-Mar-11 23:18:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0383 3-Mar?11 08:30:11
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_0384 3-Mar?11 08:33:24
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__0385 3-Mar-11 14:07:48
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_0386 3-Mar-11 20:55:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0387 3-Mar-11 22:12:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0388 3-Mar-11 22:22:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0389 3-Mar-11 22:59:09
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0390 4?Mar-11 16:50:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0391 5-Mar-11 11:47:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0392 5-Mar-11 17:19:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0393 5-Mar-11 17:35:26
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0394 6-Mar?11 12:21:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0395 7-Mar?11 11:06:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0396 7-Mar?11 11:09:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0397 7-M ar-11 11:41:01
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0398 7-Mar?11 12:00:00
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_0399 7-Mar-11 15:20:39
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0400 7-Mar?11 15:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emaii_0401 7-Mar?11 17:08:45
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0402 8-Mar-11 09:20:20
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0403 8-Mar-11 09:27:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0404 8-Mar-11 23:04:39

9

29626

Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0405 9-Mar-11 11:35:00
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_0406 9-Mar?1 1 1 1:49:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0407 9-Mar?1 1 13:22:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0408 9-Mar-11 13:45 :20
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0409 9-Mar-11 13:59:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0410 9-Mar?1 1 14:12:46
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_041 1 9-Mar?1 1 15:1 1:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0412 9-Mar-11 15:22:18
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0413 9-Mar-11 15:33:59
Defe nse_U nc|ass_Email_0414 9-Mar-11 16:21:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0415 9-Mar-11 16:29:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0416 10-Mar-11 14:16:01
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0417 11-Mar-11 08:44:04
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0418 14-Mar-11 07:45:00
Defe nse_U nclass_Email_0419 14-Mar-11 07:49:47
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0420 14-Mar-11 08:47:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0421 14-Mar-11 10:04:39
Defense_Unclass_Email_0422 14-Mar-11 10:34:02
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0423 14-Mar-11 10:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0424 14-Mar-11 10:58:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0425 14-Mar-11 13:23:39
Defense_Unclass_Email_0426 14-Mar-11 14:34:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0427 14-Mar-11 14:50:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0428 14-Mar-11 15:22 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0429 14-Mar-11 15:22:20
Defense__U nc|ass_Emai|__0430 15-Mar-11 08:59:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0431 15-Mar-11 10:10:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0432 15-Mar-11 10:35:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0433 16-Mar-11 01:09:39
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0434 16-Mar-11 08:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0435 16-Mar-11 09:08:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0436 16-Mar-11 09:09:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0437 17-Mar-11 07:56:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0438 20-Mar-11 00:37:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0439 20-Mar-11 00:42:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0440 20-Mar-11 00:52:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0441 20-Mar-11 00:56:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0442 21-Mar-11 08:22:40
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0443 2 1?Mar-11 08:23:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0444 21-Mar-11 08:30:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0445 21-Mar-11 08:31:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0446 21-Mar-11 12:50:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0447 21-Mar-11 12:53:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0448 25-Mar-11 05:23 :56
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_0449 30-Mar-11 10:02 :32
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0450 30-Mar-11 12:39:23

10

29627

Defense_Unclass_Emai|__0451 30-Mar-11 12:42:22
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0452 31-Mar-11 08:29:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0453 31-Mar-11 09:03:18
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0454 31-Mar-11 10:42:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0455 1-Apr-11 09:10:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0456 2-Apr-11 10:27:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0457 5-Apr-11 22:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0458 6-Apr?11 21:29:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0459 7-Apr-11 19:00:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0460 8-Apr-11 07:07:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0461 8-Apr-11 13:14:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0462 8-Apr-11 14: 12:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0463 8-Apr-11 14:59:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0464 9-Apr-11 11:43:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0465 9-Apr-11 11:44:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0466 9-Apr-11 11:44:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0467 9-Apr-11 12:53 :26
Defense_U 10-Apr-11 21:30:45
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0469 12-Apr-11 18:29:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0470 12-Apr-11 19:42:15
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0471 12-Apr-11 19:45:00
12-Apr-11 19:51:37
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0473 13-Apr-11 15:47:17
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0474 14-Apr-11 12:44:06
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0475 15-Apr-11 07:58:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0476 15-Apr-11 09:07:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0477 15-Apr-11 09:20:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0478 15-Apr-11 09:42:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0479 15-Apr-11 09:59:31
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_0480 15-Apr-11 17:30:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0481 16-Apr-11 08:31:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0482 18-Apr-11 10:45:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0483 18-Apr-11 13:05:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0484 18-Apr-11 15:23:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0485 19-Apr-11 14:24:07
Defense_U nclass_Email_0486 19-Apr-11 15:53:11
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0487 19-Apr-11 16:08:46
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_0488 20-Apr-11 09:37:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0489 20-Apr-11 09:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0490 20-Apr-11 10:02:04
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0491 20-Apr-11 10:02 :14
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0492 20-Apr-11 10:03 :00
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_0493 22-Apr-11 14:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0494 23-Apr-11 09:38:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0495 23-Apr-11 09:50:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0496 25-Apr-11 16:43:00

11

29628

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0497 25-Apr-11 16:45:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0498 25-Apr-11 16:47 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0499 25-Apr-11 16:49:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0500 25-Apr-11 16:50:46
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0501 25-Apr-11 17:23:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0502 25-Apr-11 17:28:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0503 25-Apr-11 17:29:10
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_0504 25-Apr-11 20:13:21
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0505 26-Apr-11 21:07:59
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0506 29-Apr-11 18:13:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0507 29-Apr-11 18:19:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0508 2-May-11 09:06:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0509 3-May-11 20:22:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0510 3-May-11 20:22:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0511 3-May-11 21:37:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0512 4-May-11 18:18:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0513 4-May-11 18:55:47
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0514 5-May-11 19:07:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0515 5-May-11 19:15 :55
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0516 5-May-11 19:16:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0517 5-May-11 20:21:30
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0518 13-May-11 15:42:11
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0519 13-May-11 17:18:33
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_0520 15-May-11 20:56:44
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0521 16-May-11 22:41:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0522 17-May-11 09:46:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0523 17-May-11 16:22:53
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__0524 17-May-11 16:34:49
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0525 17-May-11 16:41:35
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0526 17-M ay-11 17:13 :17
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_0527 19-M ay-11 11:36:52
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0528 19-May-11 11:55:08
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_05 29 19-May-11 12:04:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0530 22-May-11 20:48:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_053 1 22-May-11 20:50:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0532 22-May-11 21:00:36
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0533 22-May-11 22:01:30
22-M ay-11 22:01:52
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0535 22-May-11 23:28:57
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__0536 23-May-11 07:54:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0537 24-May-11 16:57:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0538 24-May-11 20:45:51
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0539 25-May-11 23:17:39
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0540 26-May-11 18:21:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0541 26-May-11 18:26:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0542 27-May-11 04:50:33

12

29629

Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0543 27-May-11 08:55:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0544 27-May-11 19:35:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0545 30-May-11 11:37:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0546 3 1-May-11 09:11:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0547 3 1-May-11 09:19:02
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0548 8-Jun-11 11:22:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0549 8-Jun-11 11:33 :44
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0550 9-Jun-11 22:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email__0551 9-Jun-11 22:08:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0552 10-Jun-11 08:38:14
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0553 10-Jun-11 10:10:05
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0554 11-Jun-11 23:01:28
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0555 11-Jun-11 23:03:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0556 11-Jun-11 23:04:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0557 14-Jun-11 09:36:24
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0558 14-Jun-11 12:04:00
Defense_Unclass__EmaiI__0559 16-Jun-11 11:56:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0560 16-Jun-11 13:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0561 16-Jun-11 14:11:10
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0562 19-Jun-11 18:24:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0563 19-Jun-11 21:32 :33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0564 20-Jun-11 00:18:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0565 20-Jun-11 08:12:19
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0566 20-Jun-11 12:15:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0567 20-Jun-11 12:45:51
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0568 20-Jun-11 18:19:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_0569 20-Jun-11 21:08:56
Defense_U nclass_Emai|__0570 20-Jun-11 21:11:33
Defense_Unclass_Email_0571 21-Jun-11 10:35:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0572 21-Jun-11 11:27:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0573 21-Jun-11 18:31:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0574 21-Jun-11 18:3 1:3 1
Defense_Unclass__Emai|__0575 21-Jun-11 18:35:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0576 21-Jun-11 19:02:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0577 22-Jun-11 13:29:29
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0578 22-Jun-11 13:33:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0579 22-Jun-11 18:13 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0580 23-Jun-11 08:12 :17
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0581 23-Jun-11 10:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0582 23-Jun-11 11:44:17
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0583 23-Jun-11 11:48:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0584 27-Jun-11 07:12:13
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0585 27-Jun-11 18:16:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0586 28-Jun-11 16:59:14
Defe nse_U nc|ass_Email_0587 28-Jun-11 17:16:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0588 28-Jun-11 18:20:13

13

29630

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0589 28-Jun-11 18:33 :53
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__0590 29-Jun-11 16:56:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0591 29-Jun-11 18:14:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0592 29-Ju n-11 20:37:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0593 29-Jun-11 21:11:35
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0594 29-Jun-11 22:22:44
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_0595 30-Jun-11 11:15:23
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0596 30-Jun-11 11:17:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0597 30-Jun-11 11:41:58
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0598 1-Jul-11 13:40:35
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0599 1-Jul-11 15:17:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0600 1-Jul-11 15:20:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0601 5-Jul-11 08:29:20
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0602 5-Jul-11 08:36:56
Defense_Unclass_Email_0603 5-Jul-11 08:42:13
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0604 5-Jul-11 08:58:29
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0605 5-Jul-11 12:05:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0606 5-Jul-11 16:06:30
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0607 6-Jul-11 15:07:29
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0608 6-Jul-11 15:18:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0609 7-Jul-11 02:30:32
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0610 7-Ju I-11 08:05:05
Defense_Unclass_Email_0611 7-Jul-11 08:06:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0612 7-Jul-11 14:04:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0613 7-Jul-11 16:36:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0614 8-Jul-11 02:18:19
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0615 8-Jul-11 07:54:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0616 10:47:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0617 8-Jul-11 17:05:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0618 11-Jul-11 20:31:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0619 12-Jul-11 10:26:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0620 13-Jul-11 17:32:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0621 15-Jul-11 11:48:53
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_O622 18-Jul-11 13:08:21
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0623 18-Jul-11 16:09:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0624 18-Jul-11 16:24:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0625 19-Jul-11 08:53 :30
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0626 19-Jul-11 16:24:14
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0627 19-Jul-11 16:29:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0628 19-Jul-11 17:21:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0629 19-Jul-11 19:07:15
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0630 19-Jul-11 19:10:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0631 19-Jul-11 19:32:41
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0632 19-Jul-11 20:11:48
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0633 20-Jul-11 01:05:29
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0634 20-Jul-11 06:31:37

14

29631





Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0635 25-Jul-11 09:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0636 25-Jul-11 15:31:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0637 25-Jul-11 17:52:36
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0638 26-Jul-11 07:13 :00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0639 26-Jul-11 08:10:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0640 26-Jul-11 08:10:22
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0641 26-Jul-11 08:28:36
26-Jul-11 09:13:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_0643 26-Jul-11 09:19:36
Defense_U nclass_Email_0644 26-Jul-11 09:20:38
Defense_U nclass_Email_0645 26-Jul-11 13:53:14
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0646 26-Jul-11 21:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0647 26-Jul-11 21:41:32
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0648 27-Jul-11 08:36:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0649 27-Jul-11 08:51:39
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0650 27-Jul-11 17:18:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0651 27-Jul-11 19:57:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0652 27-Jul-11 20:00:17
Defense_U nclass_Email_0653 27-Jul-11 20:15:32
Defense_U nc|ass_Email__0654 27-Jul-11 20:19:02
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0655 28-Jul-11 13:08:04
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0656 28-Jul-11 13:34:32
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0657 28-Jul-11 14:31:48
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0658 28-Jul-11 18:13 :41
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0659 29-Jul-11 10:55:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0660 29-Jul-11 10:55:01
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0661 29-Jul-11 11:06:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0662 29-Jul-11 11:25:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0663 29-Jul-11 14:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0664 29-Jul-11 16:01:05
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__0665 29-Jul-11 16:09:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0666 1-Aug-11 14:30:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0667 1-Aug-11 15:13 :06
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0668 1-Aug-11 16:14:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0669 1-Aug-11 17:16:05
Defense_U nclass_Email_0670 1-Aug-11 18:01:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0671 1-Aug-11 22:27:58
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0672 2-Aug-11 07:55:00
Defe nse_U nc|ass_Emai|_0673 2-Aug?11 13:39:49
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0674 2-Aug?11 14:50:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0675 2-Aug-11 14:50:58
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0676 2-Aug-11 15:38:56
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0677 2-Aug-11 15:42 :20
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0678 2-Aug-11 15:43:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0679 2-Aug-11 16:25:36
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0680 2-Aug-11 16:47:00

15



Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0681 2-Aug-11 17:24:14
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0682 2-Aug-11 17:25:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0683 2-Aug-11 17:33:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0684 2-Aug-11 17:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0685 2-Aug-11 17:48:15
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0686 2?Aug?11 19:19:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0687 3-Aug-11 09:21:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0688 3-Aug-11 09:50:37
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0689 3-Aug-11 11:34:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0690 3-Aug-11 12:59:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0691 3-Aug-11 13:00:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0692 3-Aug-11 13:02 :45
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0693 3-Aug-11 13:03:12
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0694 3-Aug-11 14:09:18
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0695 3-Aug-11 14:23:40
Defense_Unclass__Emai|__0696 3-Aug-11 14:25:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0697 3-Aug-11 14:33:35
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0698 3-Aug-11 14:35:08
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0699 3-Aug-11 15:43 :00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0700 3-Aug~11 16: 16:52
Defense_Unclass_Email_0701 3-Aug-11 17:10:10
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0702 3-Aug-11 17:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0703 4-Aug-11 16:21:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0704 4-Aug-11 16:27:40
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0705 4-Aug-11 16:36:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0706 - 4-Aug-11 16:36:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0707 4-Aug-11 16:43:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0708 4-Aug-11 17:06:21
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0709 4-Aug-11 18:25:45
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0710 4-Aug-11 19:25:25
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_0711 5-Aug-11 07:23:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0712 6-Aug-11 07:29:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0713 6-Aug-11 09:44:10
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0714 6-Aug-11 19:32:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0715 6-Aug?11 21:06:03
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__0716 7-Aug-11 22:13 :51
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0717 7-Aug-11 22:30:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0718 8-Aug-11 07:37:23
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0719 8-Aug-11 07:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__0720 8-Aug-11 08:29:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0721 9-Aug-11 08:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0722 9-Aug-11 08:59:24
Defense_Unc|ass_Emaii_0723 9-Aug-11 09:10:13
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0724 9-Aug-11 11:42:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0725 9-Aug-11 11:49:04
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0726 9-Aug-11 12:23:00

16

29633

Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0727 9?Aug-11 12:33 :00
Defense_U 9?Aug-11 13:04:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0729 9?Aug-11 13:30:59
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0730 9?Aug-11 13:58:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0731 9?Aug-11 14:34:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0732 9?Aug-11 15:19:00
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_0733 9-Aug-11 15:19:09
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0734 9?Aug-11 15:25:00
Defense_U nclass__Email_0735 9?Aug-11 16:28:51
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0736 9?Aug-11 16:39:11
Defe nse__U 9?Aug-11 16:45:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0738 9-Aug-11 17:35:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0739 10-Aug-11 10:39:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0740 10-Aug-11 11:47:45
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0741 10-Aug-11 15:30:22
Defense_U ncfass_Emai|_0742 11-Aug-11 09:23 :07
Defense_U nclass_Email_0743 11-Aug-11 11:45:52
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0744 11-Aug-11 18:30:57
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0745 11-Aug-11 19:26:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0746 11-Aug-11 22:09:00
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_0747 12-Aug-11 07:08:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0748 12-Aug-11 08:04:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0749 12-Aug-11 08:07:19
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0750 12-Aug-11 08:35:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0751 12-Aug-11 09:03 :58
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0752 12-Aug-11 10:18:08
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0753 12-Aug-11 16:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0754 12-Aug-11 17:05:06
Defense_U nclass_Email_0755 12-Aug-11 17:22:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0756 13-Aug-11 18:20:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0757 14-Aug-11 17:47:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0758 14-Aug-11 17:49:24
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0759 15-Aug-11 09:01:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0760 15-Aug-11 09:10:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|__0761 15-Aug-11 13:49:54
Defense_Unclass__Emai|__0762 15-Aug-11 13:53:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0763 15-Aug-11 18:38:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0764 16-Aug-11 08:16:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0765 17-Aug-11 12:35:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0766 17-Aug-11 12:36:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0767 17-Aug-11 12:36:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0768 17-Aug-11 17:26:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0769 17-Aug-11 18:35:00
18-Aug-11 09:42:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0771 18-Aug-11 09:58:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0772 18-Aug-11 09:59:28

17

29634

Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0773 18-Aug-11 10:00:08
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0774 18-Aug-11 10:02 :04
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0775 18-Aug-11 11:49:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0776 18-Aug-11 13:37:12
Defense_U nc|ass_Emaii_0777 19-Aug-11 16:01:02
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0778 19-Aug-11 17:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0779 19-Aug-11 17:28:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0780 19-Aug-11 17:46:46
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0781 19-Aug-11 18:44:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0782 19-Aug-11 18:51:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0783 21-Aug-11 06:15:14
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0784 21-Aug-11 08:54:08
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0785 21-Aug-11 11:04:19
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_O786 22-Aug-11 10:34:10
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0787 22-Aug-11 10:34:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0788 22-Aug-11 19:06:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0789 23-Aug-11 08:05:11
Defense_Unciass_EmaiI_0790 23-Aug-11 16:39:32
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0791 23-Aug-11 17:17:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_0792 23-Aug-11 17:17:16
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0793 24-Aug-11 08:48:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0794 24-Aug-11 09:03:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0795 24-Aug-11 11:53 :41
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0796 24-Aug-11 12:51:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0797 25-Aug-11 21:53:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0798 26-Aug-11 11:22:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0799 27-Aug-11 06:31:29
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0800 27-Aug-11 19:51:04
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0801 29-Aug-11 07:26:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0802 29-Aug-11 09:13:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0803 29-Aug-11 09:18:50
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0804 29-Aug-11 09:19:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0805 29-Aug-11 09:20:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0806 29-Aug-11 09:23:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0807 29-Aug-11 09:24:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0808 29-Aug-11 09:32 :03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0809 29-Aug-11 09:37:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0810 29-Aug-11 14:44:56
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0811 29-Aug-11 15:01:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0812 29-Aug-11 15:02:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0813 29-Aug-11 15:17:00
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_0814 29-Aug-11 15:39:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0815 29-Aug-11 19:28:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0816 30-Aug-11 12:58:59
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0817 31-Aug-11 09:17:15
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0818 31-Aug-11 09:21:00

18

29635



Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0819 31-Aug-11 09:49:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0820 31-Aug-11 14:59:00
Defe nse__U nc|ass_Emai|_0821 1-Sep-11 09:02 :40
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0822 1-Sep-11 09:44:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0823 1-Sep-11 11:12 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0824 1-Sep-11 11:12:51
Defense_U nc|ass_Email__0825 7-Sep-11 13:28:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0826 8-Sep-11 11:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0827 13-Sep-11 12:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0828 13-Sep-11 13:03 :54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0829 13-Sep-11 13:05:48
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0830 13-Sep-11 14:53:20
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0831 15-Sep-11 20:58:00
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_0832 15-Sep-11 20:58:59
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0833 15-Sep-11 21:02:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0834 15-Sep-11 22:52 :43
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_0835 15-Sep-11 22:54:36
Defense_Unclass_Email_0836 15-Sep-11 23:15:01
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0837 16-Sep-11 08:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0838 16-Sep-11 09:24:50
16-Sep-11 09:32:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0840 16-Sep-11 10:51:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0841 16-Sep-11 13:58:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_0842 16-Se p-11 15:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0843 16-Sep-11 17:15:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0844 16-Sep-11 17:21:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0845 16-Sep-11 17:21:35
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0846 19-Sep-11 08:52 :08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0847 19-Sep-11 08:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0848 19-Sep-11 09:03:08
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0849 19-Sep-11 09:05:23
Defense_U nclass_Email_0850 19-Sep-11 09:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0851 19-Sep-11 09:41:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0852 19-Sep-11 09:45:29
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0853 19-Sep-11 09:52:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0854 19-Sep-11 09:58:23
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_0855 19-Sep-11 09:58:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0856 19-Sep-11 10:11:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0857 19-Se p-11 10:17:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0858 19-Sep-11 15:43:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0859 20-Sep-11 16:51:49
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0860 21-Sep-11 09:48:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0861 21-Sep-11 11:13:00
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_0862 21-Sep-11 11:34:25
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_0863 21-Sep-11 13:52 :13
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_0864 22-Sep-11 18:08:00

19



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0865 22-Sep-11 19:20:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0866 23-Se p-11 10:09:10
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0867 23-Sep-11 10:44:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0868 26-Sep-11 17:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0869 27-Sep-11 07:39:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0870 27-Sep-11 11:54:03
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0871 27-Sep-11 12:27:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0872 27-Sep-11 15:00:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0873 28-Sep-11 16:12 :42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0874 28-Sep-11 16:16:54
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI__0875 28-Sep-11 16:58:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0876 28-Sep-11 17:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0877 28-Sep-11 17:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0878 29-Sep-11 08:09:01
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0879 29-Sep-11 09:30:00
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_0880 29-Sep-11 09:41:33
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0881 29-Sep-11 09:42:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0882 29-Sep-11 11:15:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0883 29-Sep-11 16:39:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0884 29-Sep-11 16:42:49
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0885 29-Sep-11 18:17:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0886 30-Sep-11 08:27:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0887 30-Sep-11 16:26:46
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0888 30-Sep-11 17:40:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0889 2-Oct-11 20:12 :40
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0890 2-Oct-11 23:47:54
3?Oct-11 08:04:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0892 4-Oct-11 07:22:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0893 4-Oct-11 19:33 :59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0894 5-Oct-11 11:24:38
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0895 5-Oct-11 14:39:46
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0896 5-Oct-11 17:09:37
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__0897 6-Oct-11 10:41:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0898 6-Oct-11 11:21:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0899 6-Oct-11 12:41:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0900 6-Oct-11 12:52:59
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0901 6-Oct-11 13:04:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0902 6-Oct-11 15:23 :00
6-Oct-11 16:01:41
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0904 6-Oct-11 16:04:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0905 13-Oct-11 12:45:21
Defense_Unclass_Email_0906 13-Oct-11 12:57:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0907 13-Oct-11 13:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0908 13-Oct-11 13:08:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0909 13-Oct-11 13:34:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0910 13-Oct-11 13:34:53

20

29637

Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0911 17-Oct-11 09:45:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0912 17-Oct-11 09:45:30
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0913 18-Oct-11 09:22 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0914 18-Oct-11 09:32:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0915 18-Oct-11 09:36:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0916 21-Oct-11 07:03:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0917 21-Oct-11 07:03:22
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0918 21-Oct-11 07:03:41
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0919 21-Oct-11 09:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0920 25-Oct-11 18:10:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0921 25-Oct-11 18:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0922 25-Oct-11 18:45:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0923 25-Oct-11 18:49:07
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0924 26-Oct-11 12:01:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0925 26-Oct-11 12:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0926 26-Oct-11 16:36:49
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0927 26-Oct-11 16:51:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0928 26-Oct-11 16:51:56
Defense_Unclass_Email_0929 27-Oct-11 12:08:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0930 27-Oct-11 12: 15:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0931 27-Oct-11 14:44:04
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0932 27-Oct-11 14:48:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0933 27-Oct-11 15:00:51
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0934 27-Oct-11 15:01:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_0935 27-Oct-11 16:04:22
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0936 27-Oct-11 16:15:44
Defense__Unc|ass_Emai|_0937 27-Oct-11 16:19:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0938 27-Oct-11 17:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0939 27-Oct-11 17:55:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0940 27-Oct-11 22:06:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0941 28-Oct-11 09:03:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0942 28-Oct-11 09:11:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0943 28-Oct-11 09:18:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_O944 28-Oct-11 09:26:45
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0945 3-Nov-11 09:59:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0946 3-Nov-11 11:52 :31
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0947 3-Nov-11 12:07:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0948 3-Nov-11 13:27:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0949 3-Nov-11 14:03:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0950 3-Nov-11 14:48:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0951 3-Nov-11 14:56:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0952 3-Nov-11 17:35:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_0953 3-Nov-11 19:56:22
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_0954 3-Nov-11 21:54:56
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0955 4-Nov-11 00:51:59
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0956 4-Nov-11 00:56:53

21

29638

Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0957 4-Nov-11 18:01:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0958 4-Nov-11 18:01:33
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0959 4-Nov-11 18:01:50
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0960 4-Nov-11 18:04:54
Defense_U nclass_Email_0961 ov-11 16:31:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0962 7-Nov-11 16:35:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0963 7-Nov-11 19:11:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0964 7-Nov-11 22:09:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0965 8-Nov-11 15:05:01
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0966 8-Nov-11 15:30:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0967 8-Nov-11 17:42:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0968 8-Nov-11 17:42:43
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0969 8-Nov-11 17:50:36
Defense_U nclass_Email_0970 8-Nov-11 17:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__0971 8-Nov-11 17:59:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0972 8-Nov-11 18:30:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0973 8-Nov-11 18:49:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0974 9-Nov-11 10:58:40
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0975 9-Nov-11 11:04:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email__0976 9-Nov-11 11:20:10
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_O977. 9-Nov-11 14:09:31
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0978 9-Nov-11 18:30:23
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0979 9-Nov-11 18:32:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0980 9-Nov-11 18:38:15
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_0981 9-Nov-11 18:42:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email__0982 10-Nov-11 13:26:14
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0983 10-Nov-11 13:44:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0984 10-Nov-11 14:14:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0985 10-Nov-11 14:18:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_0986 10-Nov-11 14:29:32
Defense_U nclass_Email_0987 10-Nov-11 14:31:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_0988 10-Nov-11 15:51:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0989 10-Nov-11 15:59:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0990 10-Nov-11 19:25:24
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_0991 10-Nov-11 22:21:30
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0992 11-Nov-11 06:54:46
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0993 11-Nov-11 07:07:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0994 11-Nov-11 08:14:35
Defense_U nclass_Email_0995 11-Nov-11 08:21:15
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_0996 11-Nov-11 09:43:03
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_0997 11-Nov-11 13:56:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_0998 13-Nov-11 20:18:43
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_0999 14-Nov-11 11:26:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1000 14-Nov-11 11:28:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1001 14-Nov-11 11:43:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1002 14-Nov-11 11:49:00

22



29639

Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1003 15-Nov-11 08:28:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1004 15-Nov-11 08:47:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1005 15-Nov-11 08:53 :31
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_1006 15-Nov-11 09:02:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1007 15-Nov-11 09:05:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1008 15-Nov-11 09:05:34
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1009 15-Nov-11 11:49:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1010 15-Nov-11 13:52:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1011 15-Nov-11 16:47:42
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1012 16-Nov-11 07:48:36
Defense_UncIass_Email_1013 16-Nov-11 07:55:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1014 16-Nov-11 14:13 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1015 16-Nov-11 14:23 :22
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1016 16-Nov-11 14:41:39
Defense_U nc|ass_Email__1017 16-Nov-11 15:36:46
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1018 16-Nov-11 16:13 :53
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1019 16-Nov-11 16:50:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1020 16-Nov-11 17:03:00
Defense_UncIass_Email_1021 16-Nov-11 17:25:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1022 16-Nov-11 17:32:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1023 16-Nov-11 18:35:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1024 16-Nov-11 18:35:29
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1025 16-Nov-11 18:35:34
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1026 16-Nov-11 18:38:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1027 16-Nov-11 20:26:42
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1028 16-Nov-11 20:55:04
Defense_Unclass__Email__1029 17-Nov-11 10:08:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1030 17-Nov-11 11:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1031 17-Nov-11 11:52 :45
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1032 17-Nov-11 12:03:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_1033 17-Nov-11 12:21:46
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1034 17-Nov-11 12:32:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1035 17-Nov-11 12:34:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1036 17-Nov-11 14:36:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1037 17-Nov-11 14:58:01
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1038 17-Nov-11 15:15:01
Defense_U nclass_Email_1039 17-Nov-11 17:12 :21
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1040 17-Nov-11 18:11:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1041 17-Nov-11 21:34:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1042 18-Nov-11 14:18:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1043 19-Nov-11 15:18:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1044 21-Nov-11 07:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1045 21-Nov-11 07:42:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1046 21-Nov-11 08:14:41
Defense_Unclass_Email_1047 21-Nov-11 08:29:17
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1048 21-Nov-11 08:52:00

23

29640

Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1049 21-Nov-11 08:53 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1050 21-Nov-11 08:57:20
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1051 21-Nov-11 09:00:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1052 21-Nov-11 09:02:28
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1053 21-Nov-11 10:05:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1054 21-Nov-11 10:20:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1055 21-Nov-11 10:21:51
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1056 21-Nov-11 14:56:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1057 21-Nov-11 14:57:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1058 21-Nov-11 15:13 :39
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1059 21-Nov-11 17:32 :50
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1060 21-Nov-11 18:10:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1061 21-Nov-11 18:14:06
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1062 21-Nov-11 18:15:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1063 21-Nov-11 18:16:29
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1064 22-Nov-11 09:15:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1065 22-Nov-11 09:21:23
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1066 22-Nov-11 11:33 :01
Defense_U nclass_Email_1067 22-Nov-11 11:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass__EmaiI_1068 22-Nov-11 11:43 :03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1069 22-Nov-11 11:48:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1070 22-Nov-11 11:54:52
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1071 22-Nov-11 12:37:44
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1072 22-Nov-11 15:44:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1073 22-Nov-11 16:22 :46
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1074 22-Nov-11 16:23:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1075 22-Nov-11 17:46:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1076 22-Nov-11 17:57:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1077 22-Nov-11 17:58 :54
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1078 22-Nov-11 18:15:46
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1079 22-Nov-11 18:59:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1080 23-Nov-11 15:28:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1081 23-Nov-11 15:30:30
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1082 23-Nov-11 15:36:07
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1083 23-Nov-11 15:37:25
Defense_U 23-Nov-11 16:16:52
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1085 25-Nov-11 13:15:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1086 27-Nov-11 13:01:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1087 27-Nov-11 13:01:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1088 28-Nov-11 08:30:25
Defense_U nclass__Emai|__1089 28-Nov-11 10:57:20
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__1090 28-Nov-11 11:08:58
Defense_Unclass_Email_1091 28-Nov-11 12:55:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1092 28-Nov-11 14:13:53
Defense_U nclass_Email_1093 28-Nov-11 16:47:20
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1094 29-Nov-11 13:36:10

24

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1095 29-Nov-11 14:22:03
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1096 29-Nov-11 14:23:14
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1097 29-Nov-11 14:27:06
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1098 29-Nov-11 14:33:23
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1099 29-Nov-11 14:56:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1100 29-Nov-11 15:05:39
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1101 29-Nov-11 15:22:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1102 29-Nov-11 15:41:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1103 29-Nov-11 15:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1104 29-Nov-11 16:00:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1105 29-Nov-11 16:01:33
Defense_U nc|ass__Email__1106 29-Nov-11 16:45:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1107 29-Nov-11 16:45:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1108 29-Nov-11 21:03:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1109 30-Nov-11 08:20:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1110 30-Nov-11 08:47 :06
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1111 30-Nov-11 10:52:19
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1112 30-Nov-11 10:53:50
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1113 30-Nov-11 11:52:28
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1114 30-Nov-11 13:35:38
Defense_Unciass_Email_1115 30-Nov-11 15:39:07
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1116 30-Nov-11 15:39:40
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1117 30-Nov-11 16:16:41
Defense_U nclass_Email_1118 30-Nov-11 19:15:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1119 30-Nov-11 22:03 :00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1120 30-Nov-11 22:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1121 1-Dec-11 07:35:48
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1122 1-Dec-11 10:15:15
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1123 1-Dec-11 14:45:23
Defense_U ncIass_EmaiI_1124 1-Dec-11 16:30:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1125 1-Dec-11 17:04:11
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1126 1-Dec-11 19:02:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1127 1-Dec-11 19:03 :04
Defense_U nclass_Email_1128 1-Dec-11 19:17 :58
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1129 2-Dec-11 09:18:10
Defense_U nclass_Email_1130 2-Dec-11 09:21:00
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_1131 2-Dec-11 11:33:10
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1132 2-Dec-11 18:49:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1133 2-Dec-11 18:50:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1134 2-Dec-11 23:00:56
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1135 4-Dec-11 11:39:08
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1136 4-Dec-11 12:09:21
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_1137 4-Dec-11 12:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_1138 4-Dec-11 12:14:11
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1139 4-Dec-11 12:38:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1140 4-Dec-11 16:44:53

25

29642

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1141 4-Dec-11 19:25:15
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1142 5-Dec-11 08:22:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1143 5-Dec-11 11:28:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1144 5-Dec-11 13:53 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1145 5-Dec-11 19:55:00
Defense_UncIass__Emai|_1146 5-Dec-11 20:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1147 5-Dec-11 20:46:27
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1148 5-Dec-11 21:26:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1149 6-Dec-11 10:34:43
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1150 6-Dec-11 10:49:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email__1151 6-Dec-11 11:00:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1152 6-Dec-11 11:31:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1153 6-Dec-11 11:31:53
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_1154 6-Dec-11 14:57:40
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_1155 6-Dec-11 14:57:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1156 6-Dec-11 15:08:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1157 6-Dec-11 15:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1158 6-Dec-11 17:47:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1159 6-Dec-11 17:53:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1160 6-Dec-11 17:55:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1161 6-Dec-11 18:25:24
Defense_U nclass_Email_1162 6-Dec-11 19:18:00
Defe nse_U nc|ass_EmaiI_1163 7-Dec-11 08:30:29
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1164 7-Dec-11 08:33:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1165 7-Dec-11 17:50:47
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1166 7-Dec-11 18:29:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1167 7-Dec-11 19:13:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1168 7-Dec-11 19:16:00
Defense_Unclass_Emait_1169 7-Dec-11 19:16:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1170 7-Dec-11 19:16:04
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1171 7-Dec-11 19:22:00
Defe nse_U nclass_Email_1172 7-Dec-11 19:25 :53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1173 7-Dec-11 19:48:34
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1174 7-Dec-11 20:12:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1175 7-Dec-11 20:28:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1176 7-Dec-11 20:34:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1177 7-Dec-11 20:56:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1178 7-Dec-11 21:13 :42
Defense_U ncIass__Emai|_1179 7-Dec-11 21:25:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1180 7-Dec-11 23:41:51
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1181 7-Dec-11 23:44:10
8?Dec-11 08:52:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1183 8-Dec-11 08:55:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1184 8-Dec-11 08:59:39
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1185 8-Dec-11 09:00:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1186 8-Dec-11 10:01:03

26

29643



Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1187 8-Dec-11 11:21:41
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1188 8-Dec-11 11:56:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1189 8-Dec-11 12:56:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1190 8-Dec-11 13:16:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1191 8-Dec-11 15:28:00
8-Dec-11 15:35:32
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1193 8-Dec-11 15:38:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1194 8-Dec-11 15:43 :33
Defense_Unclass_Email_1195 8-Dec-11 16:00:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1196 8-Dec-11 16:02:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1197 8-Dec-11 16:20:10
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1198 8-Dec-11 16:20:39
Defense_Unclass__Email__1199 9-Dec-11 08:43:46
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1200 9-Dec-11 09:04:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__1201 9-Dec-11 09:14:34
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1202 9-Dec-11 09:25:54
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_1203 9-Dec-11 09:26:10
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1204 9-Dec-11 09:33:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1205 9-Dec-11 09:34:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1206 9-Dec-11 09:43 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1207 9-Dec-11 09:44:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1208 9-Dec-11 09:54:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1209 9-Dec-11 10:00:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1210 9-Dec-11 12:04:43
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1211 9-Dec-11 13:29:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1212 9-Dec-11 13:44:13
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1213 9-Dec-11 13:45:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1214 9-Dec-11 13:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1215 9-Dec-11 13:51:47
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1216 9-Dec-11 13:52 :07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1217 9-Dec-11 17:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1218 9-Dec-11 17: 19:26
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1219 9-Dec-11 17:32:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_12 20 9-Dec-11 18:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1221 9-Dec-11 19:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1222 9-Dec-11 19:52:56
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1223 11-Dec-11 17:24:57
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1224 11-Dec-11 18:13:37
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1225 11-Dec-11 18:14:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1226 11-Dec-11 18:18:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1227 11-Dec-11 18:29:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1228 11-Dec-11 18:47:02
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1229 11-Dec-11 22:34:33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1230 11-Dec-11 23:17:24
Defense_U nc|ass__Email_1231 12-Dec-11 08:39:56
Defense_Unclass_Email_1232 12-Dec-11 14:46:37

27

29644

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1233 12-Dec-11 14:50:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1234 12-Dec-11 14:55:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1235 12-Dec-11 15:54:24
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1236 12-Dec-11 17:44:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1237 12-Dec-11 20:44:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1238 12-Dec-11 20:59:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1239 12-Dec-11 21:01:00
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_1240 12-Dec-11 21:15:05
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1241 12-Dec-11 21:20:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1242 12-Dec-11 21:42:09
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1243 12-Dec-11 22:50:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1244 13-Dec-11 08:03:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1245 13?bec-11 08:37:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1246 13-Dec-11 08:55:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1247 13-Dec-11 09:34:12
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1248 13-Dec-11 12:18:28
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_1249 13-Dec-11 16:21:26
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1250 13-Dec-11 18:45:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1251 13-Dec-11 19:06:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1252 14-Dec-11 06:21:46
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1253 14-Dec-11 09:07 :50
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1254 14-Dec-11 10:00:38
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1255 14-Dec-11 10:36:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_1256 14-Dec-11 12:34:35
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1257 14-Dec-11 13:03:28
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1258 14-Dec-11 13:27:17
Defense__Unc|ass_Emai|_1259 14-Dec-11 13:39:09
Defense__Unc|ass_Emai|_1260 14-Dec-11 14:34:51
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1261 14-Dec-11 14:36:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1262 14-Dec-11 16:08:52
Defense_Unc!ass_Email_1263 14-Dec-11 16:11:43
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1264 14-Dec-11 16:16:48
Defense_U nclass__EmaiE__12 65 14-Dec-11 16:27 :30
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1266 14-Dec-11 21:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1267 14-Dec-11 21:47 :00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1268 14-Dec-11 22:26:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1269 14-Dec-11 22:47:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1270 14-Dec-11 23:04:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1271 14-Dec-11 23:15:22
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1272 15-Dec-11 11:13:03
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1273 15-Dec-11 12:41:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1274 15-Dec-11 15:24:24
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1275 15-Dec-11 16:04:37
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1276 15-Dec-11 16:12 :19
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1277 15-Dec-11 17:47:49
Defense_U 15-Dec-11 17:54:51

28

29645

29

Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1279 15-Dec-11 18:22:47
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1280 15-Dec-11 18:54:50
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1281 15-Dec-11 20:53 :03
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1282 15-Dec-11 22:28:05
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1283 15-Dec-11 22:30:37
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1284 16-Dec-11 18:11:58
Defense_U nclass_Email_1285 16-Dec-11 18:16:22
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1286 17-Dec-11 23:05:20
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1287 17-Dec-11 23:55:59
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1288 19-Dec-11 08:28:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1289 19-Dec-11 08:43 :58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1290 19-Dec-11 09:13 :37
19-Dec-11 09:30:07
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_1292 19-Dec-11 09:37:32
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1293 19-Dec-11 20:07:06
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1294 19-Dec-11 21:22:41
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1295 20-Dec-11 09:19:48
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1296 20-Dec-11 09:20:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1297 23-Dec-11 17:44:01
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1298 27-Dec-11 16:39:47
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1299 27-Dec-11 16:42:22
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_1300 3-Jan-12 12:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1301 4-Jan-12 07:23 :00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1302 4-Jan-12 10:57:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1303 4-Jan-12 14:28:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1304 4-Jan-12 19:01:40
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_1305 4-Jan-12 19:03 :36
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1306 6-Jan-12 15:39:54
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1307 12-Jan-12 09:02:51
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1308 12-Jan-12 09:31:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1309 12-Jan-12 09:31:59
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_13 10 12-Jan-12 13:59:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_13 11 12-Jan-12 14:07:52
Defense_UncJass_Emai|__1312 14:22:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1313 12-Jan-12 14:25:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1314 12-Jan-12 14:29:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1315 13-Jan-12 16:02:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1316 15-Jan-12 17:08:35
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1317 15-Jan-12 17:49:18
. Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1318 16-Jan-12 15:39:31
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1319 16-Jan-12 15:59:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1320 17-Jan-12 15:32:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1321 17-Jan-12 15:32:37
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1322 17-Jan-12 15:55:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1323 17-Jan-12 16:44:29
Defe nse_U nclass_Emai|_13 24 18-Jan-12 10:51:00

29646



Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1325 18-Jan-12 19:09:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1326 18-Jan-12 21:30:18
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1327 18-Jan-12 21:45 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1328 19-Jan-12 09:02:20
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_1329 19-Jan-12 09:05:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1330 19-Jan-12 09:09:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1331 19-Jan-12 12:47:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1332 19-Jan-12 12:57:04
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1333 19-Jan-12 14:47:10
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1334 19-Jan-12 14:47:10
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_1335 19-Jan-12 17:36:44
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1336 19-Jan-12 17:36:44
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1337 20-Jan-12 14:25:09
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_1338 20-Jan-12 15:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1339 23-Jan-12 05:44:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1340 23-Jan-12 09:11:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1341 23-Jan-12 09:19:02
Defense_Unclass_Email_1342 23-Jan-12 12:21:28
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1343 23-Ja n-12 17:04:29
25-Jan-12 11:06:35
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1345 25-Jan-12 11:07:00
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_1346 25-Jan-12 11:12:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1347 25-Jan-12 11:13:11
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1348 25-Jan-12 12:47:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1349 25-Jan-12 14:10:02
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1350 25-Jan-12 14:26:21
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1351 25-Jan-12 14:30:51
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1352 25-Jan-12 17:23:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1353 26-Jan-12 09:21:33
Defense_U nclass_Email_1354 26-Jan-12 09:36:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1355 26-Jan-12 11:12:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1356 26-Jan-12 13:35:15
Defense_U nciass_Emai|_1357 26-Jan-12 14:59:08
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1358 27-Jan-12 11:34:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1359 27-Jan-12 11:42:24
Defense_Unclass_Email_1360 27-Jan-12 17:01:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1361 27-Jan-12 17:38:54
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1362 27-Jan-12 18:43:00
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_1363 27-Jan-12 18:43 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1364 27-Jan-12 18:43:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1365 27-Jan-12 18:43:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1366 27-Jan-12 18:44:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1367 27-Jan-12 20:56:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1368 30-Jan-12 11:30:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1369 30-Jan-12 11:30:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1370 30-Jan-12 11:31:00

30

29647

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1371 30-Jan-12 11:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1372 30-Jan-12 16:10:46
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__1373 31-Jan-12 10:57:06
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1374 31-Jan-12 11:56:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1375 31-Jan-12 12:03:29
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1376 31-Jan-12 16:48:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|__1377 31-Jan-12 17:41:52
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1378 1-Feb-12 18:12 :00
Defense_U nclass__Emai|_1379 2-Feb-12 08:28:50
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|__1380 2-Feb-12 08:30:58
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1381 2-Feb-12 08:51:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1382 2-Feb-12 08:58:30
Defense_Unclass_Email_1383 2-Feb-12 08:58:30
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_1384 2-Feb-12 09:45:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1385 3-Feb-12 09:35:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1386 3-Feb-12 09:37:58
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1387 6-Feb-12 07:24:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1388 6-Feb-12 07:28:38
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1389 6-Feb-12 07:45:32
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1390 6-Feb-12 07:47:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1391 6-Feb-12 10:48:48
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1392 6-Feb-12 13:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1393 6-Feb-12 16:18:12
Defe nse_Unclass_Emai|_1394 6-Feb-12 16:22:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1395 6-Feb-12 16:33:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_1396 6-Feb-12 16:38:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1397 6-Feb- 12 16:41:21
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1398 6-Feb-12 18:12:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1399 6-Feb-12 21:18:44
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1400 6-Feb-12 21:21:00
Defense_U nciass_Emai|_1401 7-Feb-12 07:45:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1402 7-Feb-12 13:30:30
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1403 7-Feb-12 13:50:13
Defense_U nc|ass__Email_1404 7-Feb-12 14:59:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1405 7-Feb-12 20:55:29
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1406 7-Feb-12 20:58:38
Defense_Unclass_Email_1407 8-Feb-12 14:28:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1408 8-Feb-12 16:49:23
Defense_Unclass_Email_1409 8-Feb-12 16:57:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__1410 8-Feb-12 16:59:15
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1411 8-Feb-12 17:01:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1412 8-Feb-12 22:49:00
Defe nse_Unc|ass_Emai|_1413 13-Feb-12 17:33:14
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1414 13-Feb-12 17:44:28
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1415 14-Feb-12 07:48:01
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1416 14-Feb-12 08:17:09

31

29648



Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1417 14-Feb-12 08:19:21
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1418 14-Feb-12 09:08:02
DefenseLU nclass_Emai|_1419 14-Feb-12 09:55:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1420 14-Feb-12 18:12:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1421 15-Feb-12 10:24:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1422 16-Feb-12 10:06:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1423 16-Feb-12 10:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_1424 16-Feb-12 11:36:05
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_1425 16-Feb-12 13:01:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1426 16-Feb-12 13:09:00
Defense__Unclass_Emai|_1427 16-Feb-12 13:37:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1428 16-Feb-12 13:40:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1429 17-Feb-12 09:38:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Ema|l_1430 17-Feb-12 11:07:43
Defense_Undass_Emai|_1431 21-Feb-12 13:19:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1432 21-Feb-12 23:05:00
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_1433 22-Feb-12 07:05:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1434 22-Feb-12 09:07:00
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_143S 22-Feb-12 09:17:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1436 22-Feb-12 09:20:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1437 22-Feb-12 13:18:16
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1438 22-Feb-12 14:34:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1439 22-Feb-12 15:57:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1440 24-Feb-12 08:40:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1441 24-Feb-12 10:04:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1442 24-Feb-12 11:50:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1443 24-Feb-12 17:06:20
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1444 24-Feb-12 17:25:15
Defense__Unc|ass_Email_1445 24-Feb-12 17:36:45
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1446 24-Feb-12 17:44:57
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1447 24-Feb-12 17:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1448 24-Feb-12 17:51:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1449 24-Feb-12 17:59:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1450 24-Feb-12 18:29:39
Defense_Unclass_Email_1451 24-Feb-12 18:34:20
Defense_Unc|ass_EmalI_1452 26-Feb-12 19:18:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1453 26-Feb-12 19:26:28
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1454 26-Feb-12 19:28:00
Defense_UncIass_Email_1455 26-Feb-12 19:42:30
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1456 26-Feb-12 20:53:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1457 26-Feb-12 21:50:14
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__1458 26-Feb-12 22:31:00
Defense_Unclass__Email_1459 27-Feb-12 00:15:04
Defense_Unclass_Email_1460 27-Feb-12 10:45:15
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1461 27-Feb-12 10:59:03
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1462 27-Feb-12 11:00:00

32

29649



Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1463 27-Feb-12 11:28:08
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1464 27-Feb-12 13:41:44
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1465 27-Feb-12 14:02:33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__1466 27-Feb-12 14:02:33
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1467 27-Feb-12 15:27:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1468 27-Feb-12 15:38:39
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1469 27-Feb-12 16:44:00
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_1470 27-Feb-12 20:52:51
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1471 28-Feb-12 07:39:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|__1472 28-Feb-12 09:02:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1473 28-Feb-12 09:22:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1474 28-Feb-12 14:18:36
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1475 28-Feb-12 14:51:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1476 28-Feb-12 15:18:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1477 28-Feb-12 17: 13:42
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1478 28-Feb-12 18:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1479 28-Feb-12 18:08:19
Defense_Unclass_Email_1480 29-Feb-12 09:10:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1481 29-Feb-12 10:25:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1482 29-Feb-12 10:58:00
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1483 29?Feb- 12 11:16:25
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1484 1?Mar-12 08:22:54
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1485 1?Mar-12 09:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|__1486 1?Mar-12 10:02:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1487 1?Mar-12 11:21:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_1488 1?Mar-12 12:22:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1489 1?Mar-12 12:29:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1490 1?Mar-12 16:44:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1491 1?Mar-12 17:16:06
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1492 1?Mar-12 19:17:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1493 2-Mar-12 12:11:38
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1494 2-M ar-12 12:22:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1495 2-Mar?12 12:24:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1496 2-Mar?12 12:34:07
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1497 5-Mar-12 15:57 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1498 5-Mar-12 16:58:00
5-Mar-12 17:13:13
Defense_Unclass_Email_1500 5-Mar-12 17:23:21
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1501 5-Mar-12 17:37:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1502 5-Mar-12 17:51:00
Defe nse_Unclass_Emai|_1503 5-Mar-12 18:07 :18
Defense_U nclass_Email_1504 5-Mar-12 18:08:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Email__1505 5-Mar-12 18:26:00
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1506 5-Mar-12 18:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1507 6-Mar-12 13:46:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1508 6-Mar-12 17:59:37

33

29650



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1509 6-Mar?12 18:00:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1510 6-Mar?12 18:06:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1511 6-Mar?12 18:07:48
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1512 7-Mar-12 11:13:11
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1513 7-Mar-12 11:28:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1514 7-Mar-12 11:33:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1515 7-Mar-12 11:33:34
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_1516 9-Mar-12 14:45:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1517 10-Mar-12 14:40:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1518 11-Mar-12 12:08:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1519 11-Mar-12 12:43:37
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1520 11-Mar-12 13:56:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1521 11-Mar-12 14:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1522 11-Mar-12 14:21:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1523 11-Mar-12 14:22:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1524 11-Mar-12 14:23:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1525 11-Mar-12 14:23:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1526 11-Mar-12 14:24:00
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_1527 11-Mar-12 15:20:18
Defense_U nclass__Emai|__1528 11-Mar-12 15:20:18
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1529 11-Mar-12 15:42:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1530 11-Mar-12 15:42:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1531 11-Mar-12 15:44:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1532 11-Mar-12 15:45:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1533 11-Mar-12 15:47:46
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1534 11-Mar-12 18:06:51
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1535 11-Mar-12 19:37:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1536 11-Mar-12 20:29:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1537 12-Mar-12 17:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1538 12-Mar-12 20:49:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1539 12-Mar-12 20:49:34
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI__1540 13-Mar-12 09:46:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1541 13-Mar-12 09:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1542 13-Mar-12 09:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1543 13-Mar-12 11:11:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1544 13-Mar-12 20:06:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|__1545 13-Mar-12 20:07:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1546 13-Mar-12 20:17:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1547 13-Mar-12 21:17:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1548 14-Mar-12 19:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1549 14-Mar-12 20:42:41
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1550 14-Mar-12 20:48:00
Defense_Unclass_Email__1551 14-Mar-12 20:50:56
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1552 15-Mar-12 22:02:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1553 15-Mar-12 22:18:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1554 15-Mar-12 22:36:29



34

29651

Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1555 15-Mar-12 22:37:08
Defense_UncEass_Emai|_1556 15-Mar-12 23:26:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1557 19-Mar-12 11:54:35
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1558 19-Mar-12 11:56:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1559 19-Mar-12 11:58:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1560 19-Mar-12 22:32:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1561 20-Mar-12 08:50:01
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1562 20-Mar-12 09:02:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1563 20-Mar-12 09:02:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1564 20-Mar-12 09:02:52
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_1565 20-Mar-12 13:07:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1566 20-Mar-12 13:07:59
Defense_Unc|ass__Email__1567 20-Mar-12 16:43:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1568 20-Mar-12 16:46:25
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1569 20-Mar-12 17:39:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1570 20-Mar-12 17:39:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1571 20-Mar-12 20:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emaii_1572 20-Mar-12 20:08:18
Defense_Unclass_Email_1573 21-Mar-12 08:16:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1574 21-Mar-12 08:19:15
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1575 21-Mar-12 20:39:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1576 21-Mar-12 20:39:29
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1577 22-Mar-12 07:32:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_1578 22-Mar-12 07:32:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1579 22-Mar-12 07:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1580 22-Mar-12 08:41:20
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1581 22-Mar-12 08:46:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1582 22-Mar-12 08:48:23
Defense_U 22-Mar-12 08:59:00
Defense_Unclass__EmaiI_1584 22-Mar-12 08:59:30
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1585 22-Mar-12 09:00:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1586 22-Mar-12 09:00:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1587 22-Mar-12 09:01:29
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1588 22-Mar-12 09:11:03
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1589 22-Mar-12 09:15:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1590 22-Mar-12 11:58:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1591 22-Mar-12 14:15:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__1592 22-Mar-12 14:15:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1593 22-Mar-12 14:41:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1594 22-Mar-12 14:41:34
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1595 22-Mar-12 16:53:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1596 23-Mar-12 11:25:17
Defense_Unc!ass_Email_1597 23-Mar-12 11:25:21
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1598 23-Mar-12 11:26:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1599 23-Mar-12 11:26:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1600 23-Mar-12 12:13:11

35

29652

Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1601 23-Mar-12 12:16:09
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1602 23-Mar-12 17:33:22
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1603 23-Mar-12 18:14:24
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_1604 23-Mar-12 18:14:24
Defense_Unclass__Emai|__1605 26-Mar-12 08:25:36
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1606 26-Mar-12 08:28:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1607 26-Mar-12 08:30:46
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1608 26-Mar-12 09:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1609 26-Mar-12 09:56:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1610 26-Mar-12 09:56:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1611 26-Mar-12 10:24:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1612 26-Mar-12 10:28:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__1613 26-Mar-12 10:40:20
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1614 26-Mar-12 10:41:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1615 26-Mar-12 10:43:15
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1616 26-Mar-12 11:01:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1617 26-Mar-12 15:13 :56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1618 26-Mar-12 15:57:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1619 26-Mar-12 16:28:07
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1620 26-Mar-12 17:50:57
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1621 26-Mar-12 18:10:10
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1622 27-Mar-12 09:50:00
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1623 27-Mar-12 09:50:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1624 27-Mar-12 10:39:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__1625 27-Mar-12 10:39:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1626 27-Mar-12 10:41:42
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1627 27-Mar-12 10:47:24
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1628 27-Mar-12 10:55:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1629 27-Mar-12 11:11:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1630 27-Mar-12 16:11:28
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1631 27-Mar-12 18:52:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1632 27-Mar-12 18:57:44
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1633 27-Mar-12 19:17:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1634 27-Mar-12 19:19:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1635 27-Mar-12 19:19:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1636 27-Mar-12 19:19:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1637 27-Mar-12 19:20:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1638 27-Mar-12 19:23:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1639 27-Mar-12 19:23:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1640 27-Mar-12 19:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1641 28-Mar-12 08:31:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1642 28-Mar-12 08:33:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1643 28-Mar-12 08:35:01
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1644 28-Mar-12 08:36:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1645 28-Mar-12 08:40:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1646 28-Mar-12 08:45:00

36

29653

Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1647 28-Mar-12 08:57:54
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1648 28-Mar-12 12:57 :09
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1649 29-Mar-12 08:56:25
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1650 29-Mar-12 10:22:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1651 29-Mar-12 16:52 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1652 29-Mar-12 16:55:23
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1653 29-Mar-12 19:09:11
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1654 29-Mar-12 20:38:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1655 29-Mar-12 20:42:46
Defense_Unclass_Email_1656 30-Mar-12 09:53:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1657 30-Mar-12 10:05:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1658 30-Mar-12 10:12:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1659 30-Mar-12 10:14:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1660 30-Mar-12 10:21:13
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1661 30-Mar-12 10:23:00
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_1662 30-Mar-12 15:45:23
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_1663 30-Mar-12 15:47:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1664 30-Mar-12 15:49:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1665 31-Mar-12 12:09:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1666 1-Apr-12 22:27:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1667 2-Apr-12 13:45:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1668 3-Apr-12 12:54:35
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1669 3-Apr-12 13:32:12
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1670 3-Apr-12 16:42 :33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_167 1 3-Apr-12 21:00:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1672 3-Apr-12 21:03 :01
Defense_Unclass_Email_1673 3-Apr-12 21: 10:59
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1674 4-Apr?12 10:46:05
Defense_U ncEass_Emai|_1675 4-Apr?12 11:15:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1676 4-Apr?12 14:16:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1677 4-Apr?12 17:29:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1678 4-Apr-12 17:40:55
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1679 4-Apr?12 17:43:00
Defense_Undass__Emai|__1680 4-Apr?12 17:48:46
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_1681 6-Apr-12 10:42:11
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1682 6-Apr-12 10:49:15
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1683 6-Apr-12 11:24:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1684 6-Apr-12 11:25:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__1685 6-Apr-12 17:13:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1686 6-Apr-12 17:16:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1687 6-Apr-12 17:37 :36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1688 6-Apr-12 17:42:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Email__1689 9-Apr-12 07:51:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1690 9-Apr-12 10:53:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1691 9-Apr-12 11:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1692 9-Apr-12 12:22:29

37

29654



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1693 9?Apr-12 12:24:10
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1694 10-Apr-12 08:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1695 10-Apr-12 08:48:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1696 10-Apr-12 08:49:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1697 10-Apr-12 08:51:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1698 10-Apr-12 08:52:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1699 10-Apr-12 09:00:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1700 11-Apr-12 14:56:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1701 11-Apr-12 18:37:46
Defense_Unclass_Email_1702 11-Apr-12 19:51:05
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1703 11-Apr-12 21:19:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1704 11-Apr-12 21:19:52
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1705 11-Apr-12 21:22:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1706 11-Apr-12 22:39:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1707 11-Apr-12 22:51:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1708 12-Apr-12 07:15:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1709 12-Apr-12 18:30:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1710 12-Apr-12 20:27 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1711 12-Apr-12 20:49:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1712 13-Apr-12 17:56:52
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1713 13-Apr-12 17:58:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1714 13-Apr-12 18:09:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_17 15 16-Apr-12 10:09:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1716 16-Apr-12 12:57:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_17 17 16-Apr-12 15:52:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1718 16-Apr-12 16:35:45
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1719 16-Apr-12 16:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1720 16-Apr-12 16:56:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1721 16-Apr-12 17:01:49
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_17 22 16-Apr-12 17:31:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1723 16-Apr-12 17:41:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emait_17 24 16-Apr-12 17:47:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_17 25 16-Apr-12 17:59:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1726 16-Apr-12 18:32:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1727 16-Apr-12 18:35:01
Defe nse_U nclass_Emai|_17 28 16-Apr-12 18:41:00
Defe nse_U nclass_Emai|_17 29 16-Apr-12 13:41:37
Defe nse_UncIass_Emai|__17 30 16-Apr-12 18:43 :25
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1731 16-Apr-12 18:53:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1732 16-Apr-12 18:55:13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1733 17-Apr-12 09:18:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1734 17-Apr-12 09:47:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1735 17-Apr-12 10:19:39
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1736 17-Apr-12 12: 11:27
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_1737 17-Apr-12 17:06:26
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1738 17-Apr-12 17:07:00

38



29655

Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1739 17-Apr-12 17:08:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1740 18-Apr-12 09:17:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1741 19-Apr-12 13:47:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1742 19-Apr-12 19:51:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1743 19-Apr-12 20:20:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1744 19-Apr-12 20:26:54
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1745 19-Apr-12 20:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1746 19-Apr-12 20:34:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1747 19-Apr-12 20:36:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1748 19-Apr-12 20:37:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1749 19-Apr-12 20:42 :16
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1750 19-Apr-12 20:52 :00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_1751 19-Apr-12 20:57:47
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1752 19-Apr-12 20:58:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1753 19-Apr-12 21:04:51
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1754 19-Apr-12 21:05:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1755 19-Apr-12 21:07:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1756 20-Apr-12 08:30:30
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1757 20-Apr-12 10:32:14
Defense_U nciass_Emai|_1758 20-Apr-12 10:34:48
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1759 20-Apr-12 11:45:25
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1760 20-Apr-12 12:34:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1761 20-Apr-12 18:44:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1762 20-Apr-12 18:47:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1763 20-Apr-12 18:50:03
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1764 21-Apr-12 11:09:03
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1765 21-Apr-12 17:39:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1766 21-Apr-12 18:35:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1767 23-Apr-12 08:28:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1768 23-Apr-12 19:30:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1769 24-Apr-12 09:15:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1770 25-Apr-12 19: 13:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1771 26-Apr-12 11:54:21
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1772 30-Apr-12 20:43:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1773 30-Apr-12 20:45:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1774 1-May-12 09:10:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1775 1-May-12 09:10:10
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1776 1-May-12 09:42 :35
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1777 1-May-12 09:44:50
1-May-12 09:48:32
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1779 1-May-12 10:01:26
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1780 1-May-12 12:43:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1781 1-May-12 12:58:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1782 1-May-12 13:22:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1783 2-May-12 15:02:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1784 2-May-12 16:24:46

39

29656



Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1785 2-May-12 17:37:30
Defense_Unc|ass_Emaii_1786 2?May?12 17:40:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1787 2-May-12 17:45:00
Defense_U 2?May?12 17:46:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1789 2?May?12 17:46:59
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1790 2-May-12 17:50:17
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1791 3-M ay-12 13:26:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1792 3-M ay-12 14:57:54
3-M ay-12 15:04:24
Defense_U nclass_Email_1794 3-May-12 15:23 :33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1795 3-May-12 16:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1796 3?May-12 19:05:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1797 4-May-12 15:58:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1798 4-May-12 16:16:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1799 4-May-12 16:22:32
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1800 4-May?12 16:26:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1801 7-May-12 13:11:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1802 7-May-12 13:47:16
7-May-12 14:51:38
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1804 7-May-12 16:23 :56
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1805 7-May-12 17:53:33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1806 7-May-12 18:14:49
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1807 8-May-12 09:01:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1808 8-May-12 11:14:47
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1809 8-May-12 13:10:32
Defense_Unclass_Email_1810 8-May-12 13:12:52
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1811 8-May-12 14:23 :18
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1812 8-May-12 14:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1813 8-May-12 17:11:49
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1814 10-May-12 17:3 1:13
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_1815 14-May-12 11:27:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1816 14-May-12 11:30:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1817 14-May-12 11:44:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1818 14-May-12 11:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1819 14-May-12 11:53 :07
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1820 14-M ay-12 12:21:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1821 14-May-12 12:37:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1822 15-May-12 09:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1823 15-May-12 09:31:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1824 15-May-12 09:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1825 15-May-12 11:41:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1826 15-May-12 13:40:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1827 15-May-12 15:09:29
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1828 15-May-12 15:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1829 15-May-12 15:19:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1830 15-May-12 15:25:04

40

29657

Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_1831 15-May-12 15:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1832 16-May-12 08:24:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1833 16-May-12 08:35:31
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1834 17-May-12 09:09:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1835 17-May-12 09:19:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1836 18-May-12 19:10:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1837 21-M ay-12 09:39:16
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1838 21-M ay-12 09:53:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1839 21-May-12 09:53:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1840 21-May-12 11:28:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1841 21-May-12 18:08:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1842 21-May-12 19:06:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1843 21-May-12 19:13:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1844 21-M ay-12 21:31:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1845 22-May-12 10:39:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1846 22-May-12 18:55:00
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_1847 22-May-12 19:10:25
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1848 23-May-12 06:51:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1849 23-May-12 08:09:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1850 23-May-12 08:11:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1851 23-M ay-12 08:30:24
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__1852 23-May-12 08:37:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1853 23-May-12 09:35:29
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1854 23-May-12 13:29:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1855 23-M ay-12 13:34:49
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1856 23-M ay-12 13:35 :00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__1857 24-M ay-12 17:10:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1858 24-May-12 17:14:44
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1859 24-May-12 17:42:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1860 24-May-12 18:30:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1861 24-M ay-12 22:25:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1862 29-M ay-12 09:55:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1863 29-May-12 09:55:12
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1864 29-May-12 09:59:02
Defense_U nclass_Email_1865 29-May-12 10:05:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1866 29-May-12 17:44:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1867 30-May-12 07:50:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1868 30-May-12 09:43:11
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_1869 30-M ay-12 09:46:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1870 30-May-12 09:48:33
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_187 1 30-May-12 09:54:02
Defense_U nc|ass__Email__1872 30-May-12 09:57:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1873 30-M ay-12 10:00:25
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_1874 30-M ay-12 10:02:00
Defense_U nctass_Emai|_1875 30-May-12 10:05 :58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1876 30-May-12 10:08:00

41

29658



Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1877 30-May-12 10:10:47
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1878 30-May-12 10:31:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1879 30-May-12 10:41:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1880 30-May-12 10:53 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1881 30-May-12 10:53:10
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1882 30-May-12 11:01:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1883 30-May-12 11:05:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1884 30-M ay-12 11:12:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_1885 ay-12 14:57:48
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_1886 30-May-12 14:57:48
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1887 30-May-12 15:07:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1888 30-M ay-12 15:39:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1889 30-M ay-12 15:40:52
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__1890 30-M ay-12 15:44:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|__1891 30-May-12 15:48:56
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1892 31-May-12 08:11:52
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1893 31-May-12 08:28:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1894 3 1-May-12 09:10:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1895 3 1-M ay-12 09:38:35
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1896 3 ay?12 11:52 :50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1897 31-May-12 12:28:11
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1898 31-May-12 12:54:18
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_1899 1-Jun-12 19:35:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_1900 1-Jun-12 20:03 :23
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1901 2-Jun-12 08:47:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1902 2-Jun-12 12:01:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1903 2-Jun-12 12:07:46
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1904 2-Jun-12 17:02:34
Defense_U nclass_Email_1905 4?Jun-12 09:43 :13
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1906 4-Jun?12 10:01:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1907 4-Jun-12 23:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1908 5-Jun-12 08:02:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1909 5-Jun-12 23:42:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1910 11-Jun-12 16:40:51
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1911 12-Jun-12 12:05:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1912 12~Jun-12 12:21:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1913 12-Jun-12 13:28:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1914 12-Jun-12 13:56:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1915 12-Jun-12 17:29:00
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_1916 12-Jun-12 17:41:48
Defense_U nclass__EmaiI__1917 15-Jun-12 17:44:02
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1918 15-Jun-12 18:11:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_1919 15-Jun-12 18:12:12
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1920 15-Jun-12 18:30:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1921 15-Jun-12 19:16:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1922 18-Jun-12 21:29:00

42

29659



Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1923 18-Jun-12 21:41:58
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1924 19-Jun-12 07:58:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1925 19-Jun-12 08:36:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1926 19-Jun-12 09:42:16
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1927 19-Jun-12 09:44:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1928 19-Jun-12 20:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1929 20-Jun-12 07:16:51
Defense_U 21-Jun-12 17:13 :14
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_193 1 21-Jun-12 17:57:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_1932 21-Jun-12 18:00:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1933 21-Jun-12 18:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_1934 23-Jun-12 13:07:29
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1935 24-Jun-12 21:30:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1936 24-Jun-12 21:49:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1937 26-Jun-12 11:14 :18
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1938 26-Jun-12 13:59:59
Defense_U ncIass_Emai|_1939 26-Jun-12 19:00:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1940 26-Jun-12 19:07:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1941 27-Jun-12 16:01:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1942 27-Jun-12 17:26:45
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1943 27-Jun-12 17:46:00
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_1944 27-Jun-12 17:49:52
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1945 2-Jul-12 10:22:43
Defense_Unclass_Email__1946 2?Ju|?12 20:14:00
3?Jul-12 11:57:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1948 3-Jul-12 11:58:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1949 3-Jul-12 17:03 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1950 17:15 :09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1951 9-Jul-12 14:12:55
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1952 9-Jul-12 16:47:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Emaii_1953 9-Jul-12 17:08:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1954 9-Jul-12 18:28:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1955 9-Jul-12 18:29:03
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1956 9-Jul-12 18:40:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Email__1957 9-Jul-12 19:14:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_1958 9-Jul-12 19:20:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1959 10-Jul-12 11:02 :15
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1960 10-Jul-12 11:03:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_1961 10-Jul-12 11:13 :06
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1962 10-Jul-12 15:59:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1963 11-Jul-12 14:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__1964 11-Jul-12 14:56:41
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1965 11-Jul-12 15:11:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1966 11-Jul-12 15:26:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1967 11-Jul-12 15:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1968 11-Jul-12 15:34:15

43

29660



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1969 11-Jul-12 15:42:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1970 11-Jul-12 15:47:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1971 11-Jul-12 15:52:28
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1972 11-Jul-12 15:58:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1973 11-Jul-12 16:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1974 11-Jul-12 16:02:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1975 11-Jul-12 16:06:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1976 11-Jul-12 16:52:56
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1977 11-Jul-12 16:56:01
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1978 11-Jul-12 17:26:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_1979 11-Jul-12 21:35 :00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1980 11-Jul-12 21:42 :50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1981 12-Jul-12 08:45:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1982 12-Jul-12 08:53:40
Defense_Unclass_Email_1983 12-Jul-12 08:56:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_1984 12-Jul-12 09:06:11
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1985 12-Jul-12 09:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1986 12-Jul-12 09:39:51
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1987 12-Jul-12 10: 12 :42
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1988 12-Jul-12 10:32:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1989 12-Jul-12 10:45 :08
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1990 12-Jul-12 10:47:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_1991 12-Jul-12 11:23:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_1992 12-Jul-12 11:26:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_1993 12-Jul-12 11:45:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1994 12-Jul-12 12:03 :49
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1995 12-Jul-12 13:01:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_1996 12-Jul-12 13:05:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_1997 12-Jul-12 13:11:59
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_1998 12-Jul-12 13:13:08
Defense_U nclass_Email_1999 12-Jul-12 13:17:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2000 12-Jul-12 13:17:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2001 12-Jul-12 13:27:42
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2002 12-Jul-12 13:57:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2003 12-Jul-12 18:13:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2004 12-Jul-12 18:39:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2005 12-Jul-12 19:25:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2006 12-Jul-12 19:33:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2007 13-Jul-12 21:24:28
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2008 18-Jul-12 09:13 :39
Defense_U nc|ass__Emall_2009 19-Jul-12 06:24:44
Defense_U nc|ass_Email__2010 20-Jul-12 16:19:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2011 20-Jul-12 16:19:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2012 20-Jul-12 16:27:01
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2013 20-Jul-12 16:28:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2014 23-Jul-12 13:05:34

44

29661

Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_2015 23-Jul-12 16:54:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2016 23-Jul-12 17:28:00
Defense_UncIass_Email_2017 23-Jul-12 17:34:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2018 23-Jul-12 17:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2019 23-Jul-12 17:50:53
Defense_U 23-Jul-12 17:56:05
Defense_UnC|ass_Emai|_2021 23-Jul-12 18:10:12
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2022 23-Jul-12 20:07:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2023 24-Jul-12 09:16:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2024 24-Jul-12 09:16:23
Defense_Unclass_Email_2025 24-Jul-12 15:56:45
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2026 24-Jul-12 16:05:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2027 24-Jul-12 16:05:00
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_2028 24-Jul-12 17:35:56
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2029 24-Jul-12 17:39:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2030 25-Jul-12 21:54:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2031 26-Jul-12 08:43 :10
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2032 26-Jul-12 19:49:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_2033 26-Jul-12 20:10:22
Defense_U nclass_Email_2034 26-Jul-12 21:13 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2035 27-Jul-12 11:55:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2036 27-Jul-12 11:55:18
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2037 27-Jul-12 12:24:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2038 27-Jul-12 12:28:16
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2039 27-Jul-12 12:35:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_2040 27-Jul-12 13:11:33
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_2041 27-Jul-12 19:03 :36
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2042 27-Jul-12 19:10:17
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2043 27-Jul-12 20:45:19
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2044 28-Jul-12 08:12:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__2045 29-Jul-12 13 :23 :25
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2046 29-Jul-12 14:21:10
Defense_U nclass_Email_2047 30-Jul-12 08:10:36
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2048 30-Jul-12 08:20:19
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2049 30-Jul-12 09:51:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2050 30-Jul-12 16:00:20
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2051 30-Jul-12 16:02 :54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2052 3 1-Jul-12 07:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2053 31-Jul-12 08:57:00
Defense_Unclass_Email_2054 31-Jul-12 09:45:00
Defense_Unclass__Email_2055 31-Jul-12 11:55:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2056 31-Jul-12 14:43 :12
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_2057 1-Aug-12 13:03 :34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2058 1-Aug-12 14:02:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2059 2-Aug-12 08:24:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2060 2-Aug-12 10:42:48

45

29662

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2061 2-Aug-12 10:50:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2062 2-Aug-12 11:52:19
Defense_Unclass_Email_2063 2-Aug?12 15:25:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2064 3-Aug-12 08:17:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2065 3-Aug-12 09:18:58
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2066 3-Aug-12 09:21:05
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_2067 3-Aug-12 09:24:01
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_2068 3-Aug-12 09:27:55
Defense_Unclass_Emai|__2069 3-Aug-12 11:28:48
Defense_Unciass_Emai|_2070 3-Aug-12 12:40:29
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_2071 3-Aug-12 13:21:41
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2072 3-Aug?12 13:31:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2073 3-Aug-12 14:53 :00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2074 3?Aug-12 14:54:07
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2075 3?Aug-12 15:46:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2076 3-Aug-12 18: 18:59
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2077 4?Aug-12 12:40:19
Defense_Unclass_Email__2078 4-Aug-12 12:41:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2079 6-Aug-12 09:46:3 1
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2080 6-Aug-12 12:55:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2081 6-Aug-12 12:59:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2082 6-Aug-12 13:59:56
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2083 6-Aug-12 18:23:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2084 7-Aug-12 08:13:51
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2085 7-Aug-12 12:01:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_2086 7-Aug-12 12:02:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2087 7-Aug-12 12:02:09
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2088 7-Aug-12 16:58:10
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2089 7-Aug-12 17:21:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2090 7-Aug-12 18:42:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2091 7-Aug-12 20:02:25
Defense_U nc|ass__Email__2092 8-Aug-12 07:23 :32
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2093 8-Aug-12 19:00:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2094 9?Aug-12 10:30:08
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2095 9?Aug-12 12:01:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2096 10-Aug-12 07:25:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2097 10-Aug-12 07:42 :43
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2098 10-Aug-12 07:44:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2099 10-Aug-12 07:47:19
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2100 10-Aug-12 08:30:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2101 10-Aug-12 12:29:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_2102 10-Aug-12 14:14:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2 103 10-Aug-12 14:42 :45
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2 104 10-Aug-12 14:43:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2105 12-Aug-12 2 1: 10:45
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2106 12-Aug-12 2 1: 18:17

46

29663



Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2107 12-Aug-12 21:55:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2108 12-Aug-12 22:50:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2109 13-Aug-12 09:11:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2110 13-Aug-12 09:15:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2111 13-Aug-12 16:42:20
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2112 13-Aug-12 17:13 :00
Defense_Unclass_Email_2113 13-Aug-12 18:52:00
Defense_Unclass__Emai|_2114 13-Aug-12 19:27:16
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2115 14-Aug-12 07:22:06
Defense_U 14-Aug-12 07:40:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2117 14-Aug-12 12:01:25
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_2118 14-Aug-12 12:02:00
14-Aug-12 12:07 :17
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2120 14-Aug-12 12:08:00?
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2121 14-Aug-12 12:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2122 14-Aug-12 13:13:36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2123 14-Aug-12 13:15:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2124 14-Aug-12 13:31:51
Defense_U nclass_Email_2125 14-Aug-12 13:44:21
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2126 14-Aug-12 16:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2127 14-Aug-12 16:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2128 14-Aug-12 17:15:08
14-Aug-12 17:29:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_2130 14-Aug-12 19:12:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2131 14-Aug-12 20:28:50
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2132 14-Aug-12 20:54:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__2133 14-Aug-12 21:06:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2134 15-Aug-12 09:26:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2135 15-Aug-12 09:27:05
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_2136 15-Aug-12 09:33:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2137 15-Aug-12 09:40:53
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2138 15-Aug-12 09:43:20
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2139 15-Aug-12 09:44:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2140 15-Aug-12 09:46:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2141 15-Aug-12 09:48:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2142 15-Aug-12 09:50:04
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2143 15-Aug-12 11:41:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2144 15-Aug-12 11:41:18
15-Aug-12 15:28:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2146 15-Aug-12 20:51:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2147 16-Aug-12 08:13:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2148 16-Aug-12 08:13:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2149 16-Aug-12 14:33:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2150 16-Aug-12 15:03:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|_2151 16-Aug-12 15:03:01
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_2152 16-Aug-12 16: 12 :19

47

29664

Defense_Unc!ass_Email_2153 16-Aug-12 16: 14:56
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2154 16-Aug-12 17: 13 :00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2155 16-Aug-12 17:19:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2156 16-Aug-12 17:47:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2157 17-Aug-12 07:44:13
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__2158 17-Aug-12 08:39:35
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|_2159 17-Aug-12 08:40:43
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2160 17-Aug-12 13:53 :36
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2161 17-Aug-12 14:38:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2162 17-Aug-12 16:25:49
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2163 17-Aug-12 16:29:20
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2164 17-Aug-12 16:32:01
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2165 17-Aug-12 16:34:39
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2166 17-Aug-12 18:46:01
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2167 19-Aug-12 06:17:29
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2168 20-Aug-12 08:45 :48
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2169 20-Aug-12 10:03:33
Defense_Unc|ass__Email__2170 20-Aug-12 10:05:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2171 20-Aug-12 16:45:00
Defense_U 21-Aug-12 09:41:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2173 21-Aug-12 10:33 :55
Defense_Unclass_Email_2174 21-Aug-12 10:38:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2175 21-Aug-12 12:56:00
Defense_UncIass_Emai|__2176 21-Aug-12 12:56:00
Defense_UncIass_Email_2177 21-Aug-12 18:31:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2178 21-Aug-12 19:35:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2179 21-Aug-12 19:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_2180 22-Aug-12 07:08:34
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|__2181 22-Aug-12 07:13:00
22-Aug-12 08:15:27
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2183 22-Aug-12 09:59:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2184 22-Aug-12 12:09:05
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2185 22-Aug-12 12:39:53
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2186 22-Aug-12 13:51:30
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2187 22-Aug-12 18:52:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Email_2188 22-Aug-12 19:03:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2189 23-Aug-12 11:54:59
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|_2190 23-Aug-12 12:04:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2191 23-Aug-12 12:40:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2192 23-Aug-12 15:27:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2 193 23-Aug-12 16:33 :51
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2194 23-Aug-12 16:35:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2195 23-Aug-12 16:37:21
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2196 23-Aug-12 16:39:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2197 24-Aug-12 22:57:10
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2198 25-Aug-12 06:32:04

48



29665

Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2199 25-Aug-12 06:33:16
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2200 25-Aug-12 10:58:48
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2201 26-Aug-12 22:05:00
Defense_Unc|ass__Emai|__2202 27-Aug-12 19:25:07
Defense_Unc|ass_EmaiI_2203 27-Aug-12 19:25:11
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__2204 27-Aug-12 19:27 :50
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2205 27-Aug-12 20:00:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2206 29-Aug-12 07:07 :15
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_2207 29-Aug-12 10:47 :57
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2208 29-Aug-12 17:55:55
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2209 29-Aug-12 18:15:30
Defense_U nc|ass__Emai|__2210 29-Aug-12 18:19:14
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2211 29-Aug-12 20:03:39
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2212 29-Aug-12 20:04:02
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2213 29-Aug-12 20:04:31
Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_2214 29-Aug-12 20:06:34
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2215 29-Aug-12 20:18:15
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2216 29-Aug-12 20:18:31
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2217 29-Aug-12 20:18:47
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2218 29-Aug-12 20:54:53
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2219 31-Aug-12 16:14:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_22 20 4-Sep-12 08:13:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2221 4-Sep-12 10:20:50
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_22 22 4-Sep-12 16:45:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2223 4-Sep-12 17:07:57
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2224 4-Sep-12 18:55:05
Defense_U nc|ass_EmaiI_2225 4-Sep-12 21: 16:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_22 26 4-Sep-12 22:20:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_22 27 5-Sep-12 12:54:38
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2228 5-Sep-12 15:38:40
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2229 5-Sep-12 15:40:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2230 5-Sep-12 15:41:33
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2231 6-Sep-12 11:18:24
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2232 6-Sep-12 11:46:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2233 6-Sep-12 13:04:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2234 6-Sep-12 17:58:01
Defense_U nc|ass_E mai|_2 235 6-Sep-12 17:59:32
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2236 7-Sep-12 13:52:39
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2237 7-Sep-12 13:55:43
Defense_U nclass_Email_2238 7-Sep-12 13:57:23
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2239 7-Sep-12 14:01:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2240 10-Sep-12 14:36:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2241 11-Sep-12 10:00:00
Defense_U nclass_Email_2242 11-Sep-12 13:51:00
Defense_U nclass_EmaiI_2243 11-Sep-12 17:38:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2244 11-Sep-12 18:33:00

49

29666

Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2245 11-Sep-12 18:36:00
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2246 11-Sep-12 18:38:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Email_2247 11-Sep-12 21:06:28
Defense_Unclass_Email_2248 12-Sep-12 07:25:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2249 12-Sep-12 07:32:03
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2250 12-Sep-12 16:40:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2251 12-Sep-12 16:48:00
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2252 12-Sep-12 17:10:44
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2253 12-Sep-12 21:58:00
Defense_Unclass_Emai|_2254 13-Sep-12 20:33:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2255 13-Sep-12 20:34:28
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2256 14-Sep-12 20:39:00
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2257 15-Sep-12 10:14:37
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2258 15-Sep-12 10:38:26
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2259 15-Sep-12 11:40:25
Defense_U nc|ass_E mai|_2 260 15-Sep-12 11:46:02
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2 261 15-Sep-12 12:49:07
Defense_U nclass_Emai|_2262 15-Sep-12 13: 18:54
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2263 17-Sep-12 16:40:22
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2264 18-Sep-12 09:45:04
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_226S 18-Sep-12 14:23:06
Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_2266 18-Sep-12 21:21:49
Defense_U nclass_E mai|_2 267 19-Sep-12 18:19:02
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|__2 268 19-Sep-12 18:29:04
Defense_U nc|ass_Email_2 269 20-Sep-12 15:22:25
Defense_U nc|ass_Emai|_2270 20-Sep-12 16:23:46

50

29667

02868210
29668

From: Fein, Asnden CPT USA SJA

sent: Sunday. August 01. 2010 7:54 PM

To:
Cc: ra ey, orey L. COL USA SJA

Subject: US v. Manning

unponanco: I?gh

Gents,

Unfortunately, my email seems to be the hardest For all to get straight. Please note this is
my email address . I was not included on your Friday
afternoon emails with COL Bradley, so if any information was relayed, please Forward. Thank
you.

CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Nashington (Mow)
COMM:
CELL:

NIPR:

SIPR:

Defense_Unclass_EmaiI_00O1

02216968
29669

Baton, Michael L. CPT USF-I SJ A Trial Defense Attorney

Fm":

Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2010 7:55 PM

To: Fein, Ashden cm USA s_

Subject: Out of Office: US v. Manning

I will be traveling on official business from 25 July 2010 until on or about 3 August 2010. During this time, I likely will not

be able to check this e-mail address. However, I will be available via e-mail at ?or at

. tf you have an urgent matter, please contact the Senior Defenses Counsel, CPT Bennett

Gore at?| for further assistance.

Very respectfully,
Mike Eaton

CPT, JA
Trial Defense Counsel

Defense_U nclass_Email_0002

02216967
29670

From: Huriey, Thomas MAJ MIL USA ome
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:48 AM

To: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Subject: (UNCLASSIFIED)

E?gnedlay:

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

CPT Fein

Here's the email that I sent to you and COL Bradley on Friday. Nothing you
don't already Know.

Please call when you can
COL Bradley/CPT Fein
The detailed defense counsel in the subject case are:

CPT Paul Bouchard, SDC, Liberty Field Office (Iraq)
DSN:
Email:

CPT Michael Eaton, TDC, victory Field office (Iraq)
DSN:
Email:

I have been temporarily detailed to this case. I will be your point of
contact until a permanent stateside TDS attorney is detailed by the
appropriate authority. (Likewise, I will be your PAO's point of contact.)
My contact information is below.

I will endeavor to see PFC Manning on Monday afternoon. Please let me know
if there is anything you want me to relay to him.

Thomas F. Hurley
MAJ, JA
Acting Chief, US Army Defense Counsel Assistance Program




assi 1cat1on: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Defense_UncIass_EmaiI__0003

02372814 Previously Submitted in Encl 77
Previously in Encl 1









From: Fain, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 1 1:07 AM

To: .

Cc:

A Chlet, Military Justice

subject: CM 706 Order (PFC Manning)

Attachments: Charge Sheet (ManningB).pdf; RCM 706 Order (ManningB).pdf

I?gh

Sir,

Good morning. Attached is a RCM 706 Board Order For PFC Bradley Manning. Attached is the
order and a copy of the charge sheet. Cced on this email are the defense counsel (CPT
Bouchard, CPT Eaton, and MAJ Hurley). Please advise of any delays and if your office needs
additional time than the allotted suspense, please Forward the request through me for the
convening Authority.

v/r

CPT Fein

Ashden Fein

CPT, JA

Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (HDH)
COW

CELL:

SIPR

Defense_Unc|ass_Email_OO04



02216965
29672

From: Huney, Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

8cm: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:07 AM

To: Manon, Andras M. LTC USA Manning, Robert LTC USA JFHQ-
PAO

Cc: Fein, Ashden CPT USA Bradley, Corey L. COL USA JFHQ-


Subject: RE: Defense Counsel Info (UNCLASSIFIED)

signed By: I

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Gentlemen

Here's all of my contact information. You are authorized to release it.
Please contact me with any questions.

Thanks.

Thomas F. Hurley

MAJ, JA

Acting Chief, US Army Defense Counsel Assistance Program
(work email)



iPhone email

Defense_Unclass_Email_0OO5



02879527

From:
Sean
To:
Subject:

Sir. Thanks. Are you around? I have tried calling a few times. Thanks.

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA

Fein. Ashden CPT USA SJA
Tuesday, August 03. 2010 11:09 AM

Hudey. Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

RE: Defense Counsel Info (UNCLASSIFIED)

Chief, Military Justice
U.S. Army Military District of Washington (VON)

COMM:
CELL:
NIPR:
SIPR:



Defense_U nclass_EmaiI__0006



29673

02868185
29674

From: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA

Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:38 AM

To: Hurtey, Thomas MAJ MIL USA OTJAG

Subject: US v. Manning

Attachments: Delay Request Granted 12 Jul 2010 (Manning).pdf; LTC Memtka Appoint. as Art. 32 IO 6 Jul

2010 (Manning).pdf; Reconsideration of Expert Assis. Request-Approved 23 Jul 2010
(Manning).pdf; Renewed Request for Sanity Board and Request for Medical Expert 18 Jul
2010 (Manning).pdf; Request for Expert Assistance 13 Jul 2010 (Manning).pdf; Request for
Expert Assistance- Denied 13 Jul 2010 (Manning).pdf; Request for Sanity Board 11 Jul 2010
(Manning).pdf; Request Reconsideration of Disapproval for Expert Assistance 16 Jul 2010
(Manning).pdf; Art. 32 Investigation Memo 10 Jul 2010 (Manning).pdf; Defense Art. 32 Delay
Request 12 Jul 2010 (Manning).pdf; Defense Delay Request 11 Jul 2010 (Manning).pdf

Sir. Docs attached.

Ashden Fein
CPT, JA
Chief, Military Justice

U.S. Army Military District of Washington (MDW)

com: (DSN 325)
can?



Defense_Unclass_Email_0007

02216964

29675
From: Hurtey, Thomas MAJ MIL USA OT
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:35 PM
To: Bradley, Corey L. COL USA Marlon, Andras M. LTC USA JFHQ-



Cc: Fein, Ashden CPT USA Sweetland, Elizabeth LTC MIL USA OTJAG
Subject: Media Contact (UNCLASSIFIED)
signed By:

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Sir,

I've already talked to a couple members of the media. (Mom always said I'd
be a star.)

I had no ?on the record? public comment about the trial, but I did explain a
few things about the military justice process military accused's right
to counsel, pre-trial confinement review process, the Article 32 hearing,
etc.) off the record. (I gave them that general information in order to
avoid giving them the ?run around? about non-controversial matters. Just
the sort of statements that you would make at a cocktail party about the
military justice process generally.)

I am happy to refer those general questions to a non?party (like maybe

someone in the AdLaw shop). Do you have someone over there identified to do

that? If not, could you? I fear being misunderstood (and misquoted) and

then CPT Fein would have to respond and then I would have to respond to his

response (and so on).

Please let me know how you want me to proceed.
Thanks.
v/r

Thomas F. Hurley
MAJ, JA



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Defense_U nctass__EmaiI_0OO8



02206524
29676

From: Rose, Luke CPT USD-C SJA Chief, Military Justice

Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2010 1:43 PM
To: Bouchard, Paul R. CPT USD-C DSTB CO TDS Sr Defense Counsel


Cc: Fein, Ashden CPT USA SJA
Subject: US v. Manning (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classi?cation: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOU0



Paul.

Here is some contact infomation from their website.
-Luke

COMMANDING OFFICER -

BRIG SUPERVISOR 1
BRIG 1ST SGT -
OPERATIONS CHIEF
SPECIAL QUARTERS
COMPANY GUNNY
PROGRAMS CHIEF
TRAINING CHIEF
SENIOR COUNSELOR
COUNSELOR #1
COUNSELOR #2
ADMIN #1
ADMIN #2
VALUABLES
CONTROL CENIER

WORKSHOP
MEDICAL
CCU
MESSDECK

BRIG MAILING ADDRESS:

3247 Elrod Avenue

Defense_Unc|ass_Emai|_00O9

29677

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING AND ARRANGING RECORD OF TRIAL
USE OF FORM - Use this form and MCM, 1984,
Appendix 14, will be used by the trial counsel and
the reporter as a guide to the preparation of the
record of trial in general and special court-martial
cases in which a verbatim record is prepared. Air
Force uses this form and departmental
instructions as a guide to the preparation of the
record of trial in general and special court-martial
cases in which a summarized record is authorized.
Army and Navy use DD Form 491 for records of
trial in general and special court-martial cases in
which a summarized record is authorized.
Inapplicable words of the printed text will be
deleted.

8. Matters submitted by the accused pursuant to
Article 60 (MCM, 1984, RCM 1105).

COPIES - See MCM, 1984, RCM 1103(g). The
convening authority may direct the preparation of
additional copies.

12. Advice of staff judge advocate or legal officer,
when prepared pursuant to Article 34 or otherwise.

ARRANGEMENT - When forwarded to the
appropriate Judge Advocate General or for judge
advocate review pursuant to Article 64(a), the
record will be arranged and bound with allied
papers in the sequence indicated below. Trial
counsel is responsible for arranging the record as
indicated, except that items 6, 7, and 15e will be
inserted by the convening or reviewing authority,
as appropriate, and items 10 and 14 will be
inserted by either trial counsel or the convening or
reviewing authority, whichever has custody of
them.

13. Requests by counsel and action of the
convening authority taken thereon (e.g., requests
concerning delay, witnesses and depositions).

1. Front cover and inside front cover (chronology
sheet) of DD Form 490.
2. Judge advocate's review pursuant to Article
64(a), if any.
3. Request of accused for appellate defense
counsel, or waiver/withdrawal of appellate rights,
if applicable.
4. Briefs of counsel submitted after trial, if any
(Article 38(c)).
5. DD Form 494, "Court-Martial Data Sheet."

9. DD Form 458, "Charge Sheet" (unless included
at the point of arraignment in the record).
10. Congressional inquiries and replies, if any.
11. DD Form 457, "Investigating Officer's Report,"
pursuant to Article 32, if such investigation was
conducted, followed by any other papers which
accompanied the charges when referred for trial,
unless included in the record of trial proper.

14. Records of former trials.
15. Record of trial in the following order:
a. Errata sheet, if any.
b. Index sheet with reverse side containing
receipt of accused or defense counsel for copy of
record or certificate in lieu of receipt.
c. Record of proceedings in court, including
Article 39(a) sessions, if any.
d. Authentication sheet, followed by certificate
of correction, if any.
e. Action of convening authority and, if appropriate, action of officer exercising general courtmartial jurisdiction.
f. Exhibits admitted in evidence.

6. Court-martial orders promulgating the result of
trial as to each accused, in 10 copies when the
record is verbatim and in 4 copies when it is
summarized.

g. Exhibits not received in evidence. The page
of the record of trial where each exhibit was
offered and rejected will be noted on the front of
each exhibit.

7. When required, signed recommendation of
staff judge advocate or legal officer, in duplicate,
together with all clemency papers, including
clemency recommendations by court members.

h. Appellate exhibits, such as proposed instructions, written offers of proof or preliminary
evidence (real or documentary), and briefs of
counsel submitted at trial.

DD FORM 490, MAY 2000

Inside of Back Cover

e-Highlighter

Click to send permalink to address bar, or right-click to copy permalink.

Un-highlight all Un-highlight selectionu Highlight selectionh